Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block in patients undergoing radical mastectomy

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block in patients undergoing radical mastectomy","authors":"","doi":"10.22514/ejgo.2023.083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral nerve block in patients undergoing radical mastectomy. Ninety-six patients who underwent radical mastectomy were equally divided into a study group (administered with a continuous thoracic paravertebral nerve block and general anesthesia) and a control group (given conventional general anesthesia) with a random number table. At T2–T4 (T2: immediate tracheal intubation; T3: at skin incision; T4: at extubation), mean artery pressure (MAP) and hear rate (HR) were significantly lower in the study group (p < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference in blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) between the two groups at different time points. At T2–T4, cortisol (Cor) levels were significantly lower in the study group (p < 0.05). At T0–T2, there was no significant difference in the levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) between the two groups. At T3–T4, the levels of ACTH in the study group were significantly lower (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood pressure between the two groups at any time point. At the moment of discharge from the resuscitation room and 2 hours after surgery, the numerical rating scale (NRS) score in the study group was significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was 10.42%; this was lower than that in the control group (33.33%) (p < 0.05). Finally, the use of fentanyl and propofol, and the frequency of analgesic pump use, were significantly lower in the study group (p < 0.05). Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block can effectively maintain hemodynamic stability, improve the stress response, reduce postoperative pain, reduce the use of anesthetic drugs, and effectively control the incidence of adverse reactions in patients undergoing radical mastectomy.","PeriodicalId":11903,"journal":{"name":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","volume":"241 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/ejgo.2023.083","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided continuous thoracic paravertebral nerve block in patients undergoing radical mastectomy. Ninety-six patients who underwent radical mastectomy were equally divided into a study group (administered with a continuous thoracic paravertebral nerve block and general anesthesia) and a control group (given conventional general anesthesia) with a random number table. At T2–T4 (T2: immediate tracheal intubation; T3: at skin incision; T4: at extubation), mean artery pressure (MAP) and hear rate (HR) were significantly lower in the study group (p < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference in blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) between the two groups at different time points. At T2–T4, cortisol (Cor) levels were significantly lower in the study group (p < 0.05). At T0–T2, there was no significant difference in the levels of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) between the two groups. At T3–T4, the levels of ACTH in the study group were significantly lower (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood pressure between the two groups at any time point. At the moment of discharge from the resuscitation room and 2 hours after surgery, the numerical rating scale (NRS) score in the study group was significantly reduced (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was 10.42%; this was lower than that in the control group (33.33%) (p < 0.05). Finally, the use of fentanyl and propofol, and the frequency of analgesic pump use, were significantly lower in the study group (p < 0.05). Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block can effectively maintain hemodynamic stability, improve the stress response, reduce postoperative pain, reduce the use of anesthetic drugs, and effectively control the incidence of adverse reactions in patients undergoing radical mastectomy.
超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞在乳房根治术中的应用
本研究旨在探讨超声引导下连续胸椎旁神经阻滞在乳房根治术患者中的应用效果。96例接受根治性乳房切除术的患者平均分为研究组(给予连续胸椎旁神经阻滞和全身麻醉)和对照组(给予常规全身麻醉),采用随机数字表。在T2 - T4 (T2:立即气管插管;T3:皮肤切开;T4:拔管),研究组平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)显著降低(p <两组在不同时间点血氧饱和度(SpO2)差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。T2-T4时,研究组皮质醇(Cor)水平显著降低(p <0.05)。T0-T2时,两组促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)水平差异无统计学意义。T3-T4时,研究组ACTH水平显著降低(p <0.05)。两组在任何时间点的血压均无显著差异。在复苏室出院时及术后2 h,研究组的数值评定量表(NRS)评分显著降低(p <0.05)。研究组不良反应发生率为10.42%,低于对照组的33.33% (p <0.05)。最后,研究组芬太尼和异丙酚的使用以及镇痛泵的使用频率均显著低于对照组(p <0.05)。超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞能有效维持血流动力学稳定,改善应激反应,减轻术后疼痛,减少麻醉药物的使用,有效控制乳房根治术患者不良反应的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJGO is dedicated to publishing editorial articles in the Distinguished Expert Series and original research papers, case reports, letters to the Editor, book reviews, and newsletters. The Journal was founded in 1980 the second gynaecologic oncology hyperspecialization Journal in the world. Its aim is the diffusion of scientific, clinical and practical progress, and knowledge in female neoplastic diseases in an interdisciplinary approach among gynaecologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, surgeons, chemotherapists, pathologists, epidemiologists, and so on.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信