Enforcement of Competition Law on Digital Platforms – Responsive Modelling for Digitization Challenges under the EU Law

Tamta Margvelashvili
{"title":"Enforcement of Competition Law on Digital Platforms – Responsive Modelling for Digitization Challenges under the EU Law","authors":"Tamta Margvelashvili","doi":"10.60131/jlaw.1.2023.7063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The law of the European Union (hereinafter the “EU\") is a complex legal system that builds supranational law on the basis of comparative studies.[1] For the EU the harmonization of law is one of the instruments that ensures the proper functioning of the EU internal market and achieves the idea of perfecting European integration, which has long gone beyond its current geographical boundaries to include the \"Third World\".[2] Accordingly, the harmonization of competition law is not only an endeavor for EU member states to develop a unified system to ensure effective competition, but it is also a basic tool for countries on the path to EU membership.
 This particular paper is focused on these important issues. It by directing its attention on the root of harmonization of EU competition law enforcement, presents the possibilities of competition enforcement mechanisms legal transfer for digital platforms from one jurisdiction to another based on a comparative method. Therefore, the first research object of the article is the normative and case law trends of the European Union, that ensure the enforcement of fair competition for digital platforms in the continuous process of digitization. On the other hand, the focus is shifted towards the prospects of harmonization of competition law enforcement tools for digital platforms in Georgia.
 
 [1] Vranken M., Fundamentals of European civil law. Blackstone Press, London, 1997, 14.
 [2] The term is used to refer to a country that is not a member of the European Union. Citizens do not enjoy free movement within the EU according to Article 2(5) of EU Regulation 2016/399 (Schengen Code).","PeriodicalId":32648,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Law","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2023.7063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The law of the European Union (hereinafter the “EU") is a complex legal system that builds supranational law on the basis of comparative studies.[1] For the EU the harmonization of law is one of the instruments that ensures the proper functioning of the EU internal market and achieves the idea of perfecting European integration, which has long gone beyond its current geographical boundaries to include the "Third World".[2] Accordingly, the harmonization of competition law is not only an endeavor for EU member states to develop a unified system to ensure effective competition, but it is also a basic tool for countries on the path to EU membership. This particular paper is focused on these important issues. It by directing its attention on the root of harmonization of EU competition law enforcement, presents the possibilities of competition enforcement mechanisms legal transfer for digital platforms from one jurisdiction to another based on a comparative method. Therefore, the first research object of the article is the normative and case law trends of the European Union, that ensure the enforcement of fair competition for digital platforms in the continuous process of digitization. On the other hand, the focus is shifted towards the prospects of harmonization of competition law enforcement tools for digital platforms in Georgia. [1] Vranken M., Fundamentals of European civil law. Blackstone Press, London, 1997, 14. [2] The term is used to refer to a country that is not a member of the European Union. Citizens do not enjoy free movement within the EU according to Article 2(5) of EU Regulation 2016/399 (Schengen Code).
数字平台竞争法的执行——欧盟法律下数字化挑战的响应式建模
欧盟法(以下简称“EU”)是一个在比较研究的基础上构建超国家法的复杂法律体系。[1]对于欧盟而言,法律的协调是确保欧盟内部市场正常运作和实现完善欧洲一体化理念的工具之一,而欧洲一体化早已超越了目前的地理边界,包括了“第三世界”。[2]因此,竞争法的协调不仅是欧盟成员国为确保有效竞争而制定统一制度的努力,也是各国加入欧盟的基本工具。 这篇特别的论文集中在这些重要的问题上。它通过将注意力集中在欧盟竞争执法协调的根源上,提出了基于比较方法的数字平台竞争执法机制从一个司法管辖区转移到另一个司法管辖区的可能性。因此,本文的第一个研究对象是欧盟的规范和判例法趋势,这些趋势确保了数字平台在持续的数字化过程中公平竞争的执行。另一方面,重点转移到格鲁吉亚数字平台竞争执法工具的协调前景。 & # x0D;[1]刘建军。欧洲大陆民法基础。黑石出版社,伦敦,1997,14. [2]这个词用来指非欧盟成员国的国家。根据欧盟法规2016/399(申根法典)第2(5)条,公民不享有欧盟内部的自由流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信