Problems of Parliamentary Oversight on Secret Activities of Institutes of National Security Assurance System of Georgia

Levan Alapishvili
{"title":"Problems of Parliamentary Oversight on Secret Activities of Institutes of National Security Assurance System of Georgia","authors":"Levan Alapishvili","doi":"10.60131/jlaw.1.2023.7070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Democratic governance is based on the accountability of the government to the parliament. Oversight of the government activities by the representative body that has absolute legitimation of population ensures democratic environment for decision-making and efficient accountability of the Government. An effective system of accountability of the government to the parliament ensures the accountability of the government to its population. Parliamentary oversight of the government's activities is a constitutional obligation to ensure accountability to the source of power, i.e. citizens.
 Significant part of activities and decisions of government is related to secret activities and documents. Legislative regulation of state secrets and delegation of authority or authorization to the Government is an exclusive competence of Parliament under the Constitution of Georgia.
 The Parliament, the members of which do not have access to state secrecy cannot ensure the parliamentary oversight of secret activity of the Government or if decision-making regarding the issue of allowing access of Members of Parliament to the state secrecy is delegated to the government. Unlimited delegation of the right to regulate the access of MPs to the state secrecy comes into conflict with the Constitution, because it means the violation of accountability to the Parliament and separation of power which deprives the Parliament of the possibility to exercise oversight on the Government’s work. 
 This work provides an analysis of the regulatory environment for state secrecy of Georgia and the delegation of authority of legal regulation of state secret management. 
 By presenting a comparative analysis of Georgian and foreign practice of parliamentary oversight regarding state secret activities, we are putting forward for discussion the issues related to the regulation of accessibility to state secrecy by members of Parliament and the suggestions regarding the solution of actual issues of parliamentary oversight of government’s secret activities.","PeriodicalId":32648,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Law","volume":"363 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60131/jlaw.1.2023.7070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Democratic governance is based on the accountability of the government to the parliament. Oversight of the government activities by the representative body that has absolute legitimation of population ensures democratic environment for decision-making and efficient accountability of the Government. An effective system of accountability of the government to the parliament ensures the accountability of the government to its population. Parliamentary oversight of the government's activities is a constitutional obligation to ensure accountability to the source of power, i.e. citizens. Significant part of activities and decisions of government is related to secret activities and documents. Legislative regulation of state secrets and delegation of authority or authorization to the Government is an exclusive competence of Parliament under the Constitution of Georgia. The Parliament, the members of which do not have access to state secrecy cannot ensure the parliamentary oversight of secret activity of the Government or if decision-making regarding the issue of allowing access of Members of Parliament to the state secrecy is delegated to the government. Unlimited delegation of the right to regulate the access of MPs to the state secrecy comes into conflict with the Constitution, because it means the violation of accountability to the Parliament and separation of power which deprives the Parliament of the possibility to exercise oversight on the Government’s work. This work provides an analysis of the regulatory environment for state secrecy of Georgia and the delegation of authority of legal regulation of state secret management. By presenting a comparative analysis of Georgian and foreign practice of parliamentary oversight regarding state secret activities, we are putting forward for discussion the issues related to the regulation of accessibility to state secrecy by members of Parliament and the suggestions regarding the solution of actual issues of parliamentary oversight of government’s secret activities.
格鲁吉亚国家安全保障体系机构秘密活动的议会监督问题
民主治理的基础是政府对议会负责。具有绝对合法性的人民代表机构对政府活动的监督确保了决策的民主环境和政府的有效问责制。一个有效的政府对议会负责的制度确保了政府对人民负责。议会对政府活动的监督是一项宪法义务,以确保对权力来源(即公民)负责。政府的活动和决策有很大一部分与秘密活动和文件有关。根据《格鲁吉亚宪法》,对国家机密进行立法管理和向政府授权是议会的专有权限。议会成员无法接触到国家机密,因此不能确保议会对政府的秘密活动进行监督,也不能确保有关允许议会成员接触国家机密问题的决策被委托给政府。无限制地授权国会议员获取国家机密的权利是与宪法相冲突的,因为这意味着违反了对议会的问责和三权分立,剥夺了议会对政府工作进行监督的可能性。& # x0D;本研究分析了格鲁吉亚国家保密的监管环境以及国家秘密管理法律监管的权力下放。& # x0D;本文通过对格鲁吉亚与国外议会对国家秘密活动的监督实践进行比较分析,提出议会议员获取国家秘密的监管相关问题,并就议会监督政府秘密活动的实际问题提出解决建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信