Research on the Realization Mechanism and Evaluation System of High-Quality Undergraduate Education in Private Universities Based on Deep Learning

IF 0.9 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Jun Wang
{"title":"Research on the Realization Mechanism and Evaluation System of High-Quality Undergraduate Education in Private Universities Based on Deep Learning","authors":"Jun Wang","doi":"10.17993/3ctic.2023.122.97-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the new development stage, it is especially important to improve the education quality of private undergraduate universities. As a result, it is a new hot issue for the construction of a mechanism and assessment system for the quality improvement of private undergraduate education. In this paper, after analyzing and researching the quality of undergraduate education in present-day universities, the mechanism of deep learning is applied to the establishment of the assessment system. Finally, 1082 samples collected from the data center platform of a private university are analyzed as the research object. From the results, the final size of the combined weights of the seven evaluation items constituting the assessment system differed basically little. They were 12.81%, 15.78%, 15.28%, 14.38%, 12.83%, 12.81%, 15.01%, and 13.27%, respectively. In the comparison of this paper's method with FAHP+TOPSIS combined evaluation, euclidean map method, and genetic algorithm assignment, the difference between the seven weight values of the euclidean map method is larger, 5.56%. The evaluation times of the four methods were 41 s, 38 s, 47 s, and 118 s. Compared with the other three methods, the genetic algorithm assignment took the most time.","PeriodicalId":40869,"journal":{"name":"3C Tic","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3C Tic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17993/3ctic.2023.122.97-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the new development stage, it is especially important to improve the education quality of private undergraduate universities. As a result, it is a new hot issue for the construction of a mechanism and assessment system for the quality improvement of private undergraduate education. In this paper, after analyzing and researching the quality of undergraduate education in present-day universities, the mechanism of deep learning is applied to the establishment of the assessment system. Finally, 1082 samples collected from the data center platform of a private university are analyzed as the research object. From the results, the final size of the combined weights of the seven evaluation items constituting the assessment system differed basically little. They were 12.81%, 15.78%, 15.28%, 14.38%, 12.83%, 12.81%, 15.01%, and 13.27%, respectively. In the comparison of this paper's method with FAHP+TOPSIS combined evaluation, euclidean map method, and genetic algorithm assignment, the difference between the seven weight values of the euclidean map method is larger, 5.56%. The evaluation times of the four methods were 41 s, 38 s, 47 s, and 118 s. Compared with the other three methods, the genetic algorithm assignment took the most time.
基于深度学习的民办高校本科优质教育实现机制与评价体系研究
在新的发展阶段,提高民办本科院校的教育质量显得尤为重要。因此,构建民办本科教育质量提升的机制和评估体系成为一个新的热点问题。本文通过对当前高校本科教育质量的分析和研究,将深度学习的机制应用于本科教育质量评价体系的构建。最后以某民办高校数据中心平台采集的1082个样本作为研究对象进行分析。从结果看,构成评价体系的7个评价项目的综合权重最终大小相差基本不大。分别为12.81%、15.78%、15.28%、14.38%、12.83%、12.81%、15.01%、13.27%。将本文方法与FAHP+TOPSIS联合评价法、欧几里得图法、遗传算法分配法进行比较,欧几里得图法的7个权重值相差较大,为5.56%。4种方法的评价时间分别为41 s、38 s、47 s和118 s。与其他三种方法相比,遗传算法分配时间最长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
3C Tic
3C Tic COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信