Comparison of sensory fusion recovery in different types programming of liquid crystal glasses

Igor E. Aznauryan, Alexander A. Shpak, Victoria O. Balasanyan, Satenik G. Agagulyan
{"title":"Comparison of sensory fusion recovery in different types programming of liquid crystal glasses","authors":"Igor E. Aznauryan, Alexander A. Shpak, Victoria O. Balasanyan, Satenik G. Agagulyan","doi":"10.15275/1902121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to compare the effectiveness of new method of sensory fusion recovery in patients with personalized adjustment of the frequency of alternation of liquid crystal glasses (LCG) compared with the empirical selection of the frequency of alternation. Material and methods. The study included 39 patients with concomitant convergent strabismus with orthotropy and no sensory fusion after surgical treatment of strabismus, who were prescribed LCG. The glasses were programmed empirically at 2 Hz in 21 patients (empiric group), in 18 patients — using the developed formula for calculating the frequency of alternation of LCG (calculated group). The compared groups did not differ in gender, age, visual acuity, and other characteristics. Results. Recovery of sensory fusion occurred more often with LCG in calculated group (16 patients, 88.9%) than in empiric group (9 patients, 42.9%), the difference is highly reliable (p=0.001). Conclusions. Anew method for personalized selection of the frequency of alternating LCG using video oculography is more efficient than empirical programming for sensory fusion restoration in children after surgery for concomitant convergent strabismus.","PeriodicalId":30092,"journal":{"name":"Saratovskii nauchnomeditsinskii zhurnal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saratovskii nauchnomeditsinskii zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15275/1902121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to compare the effectiveness of new method of sensory fusion recovery in patients with personalized adjustment of the frequency of alternation of liquid crystal glasses (LCG) compared with the empirical selection of the frequency of alternation. Material and methods. The study included 39 patients with concomitant convergent strabismus with orthotropy and no sensory fusion after surgical treatment of strabismus, who were prescribed LCG. The glasses were programmed empirically at 2 Hz in 21 patients (empiric group), in 18 patients — using the developed formula for calculating the frequency of alternation of LCG (calculated group). The compared groups did not differ in gender, age, visual acuity, and other characteristics. Results. Recovery of sensory fusion occurred more often with LCG in calculated group (16 patients, 88.9%) than in empiric group (9 patients, 42.9%), the difference is highly reliable (p=0.001). Conclusions. Anew method for personalized selection of the frequency of alternating LCG using video oculography is more efficient than empirical programming for sensory fusion restoration in children after surgery for concomitant convergent strabismus.
液晶玻璃不同类型编程后感觉融合恢复的比较
目的:比较个性化调整液晶玻璃(LCG)交替频率与经验选择交替频率的患者感觉融合恢复新方法的效果。材料和方法。本研究纳入39例斜视手术治疗后无感觉融合伴发性会聚性斜视患者,给予LCG治疗。在21名患者(经验组)和18名患者中,使用开发的公式计算LCG交替频率(计算组),经验地将眼镜编程为2hz。比较组在性别、年龄、视力和其他特征上没有差异。结果。计算组(16例,88.9%)与经验组(9例,42.9%)相比,LCG术后感觉融合恢复较多,差异具有高度可靠性(p=0.001)。结论。在儿童共同性会聚性斜视手术后的感觉融合恢复中,视频视觉术个性化选择交替LCG频率的新方法比经验规划更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信