Evaluation of STEM students' critical thinking in terms of cognitive style through problem-based distance learning

Q2 Social Sciences
None Lubna, None Suhirman, Saiful Prayogi
{"title":"Evaluation of STEM students' critical thinking in terms of cognitive style through problem-based distance learning","authors":"None Lubna, None Suhirman, Saiful Prayogi","doi":"10.20448/jeelr.v10i3.4972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advent of digital technology has brought about a transformation in the field of education, from traditional face-to-face learning to distance learning. Despite this shift, it is important to prioritize the development of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) students' critical thinking (CT) abilities as an essential skill for success in the 21st century. The objective of this study is to assess the critical thinking (CT) skills of students in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) by considering their cognitive styles, namely field-independent and field-dependent, through the implementation of Problem-Based Distance Learning (PBDL). The research follows an evaluative and experimental approach based on the Kirkpatrick four-level model, which was conducted at one of the universities providing STEM education in eastern Indonesia. To evaluate different components of learning, cognitive style, and critical thinking (CT), a wide range of tools with tested psychometric features (validity and reliability) were used. A comprehensive examination using both descriptive and statistical analyses was undertaken to evaluate the outcomes. The results of this study indicate that Problem-Based Distance Learning (PBDL) is a successful approach in enhancing the Critical Thinking (CT) skills of STEM students, irrespective of their cognitive types. The paper provides a detailed discussion of the thorough examination of input, process, output, and outcome factors. This study is very valuable and will contribute to a lot of literature, especially related to the development of distance pedagogy in STEM learning.","PeriodicalId":36689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and e-Learning Research","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and e-Learning Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i3.4972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advent of digital technology has brought about a transformation in the field of education, from traditional face-to-face learning to distance learning. Despite this shift, it is important to prioritize the development of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) students' critical thinking (CT) abilities as an essential skill for success in the 21st century. The objective of this study is to assess the critical thinking (CT) skills of students in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) by considering their cognitive styles, namely field-independent and field-dependent, through the implementation of Problem-Based Distance Learning (PBDL). The research follows an evaluative and experimental approach based on the Kirkpatrick four-level model, which was conducted at one of the universities providing STEM education in eastern Indonesia. To evaluate different components of learning, cognitive style, and critical thinking (CT), a wide range of tools with tested psychometric features (validity and reliability) were used. A comprehensive examination using both descriptive and statistical analyses was undertaken to evaluate the outcomes. The results of this study indicate that Problem-Based Distance Learning (PBDL) is a successful approach in enhancing the Critical Thinking (CT) skills of STEM students, irrespective of their cognitive types. The paper provides a detailed discussion of the thorough examination of input, process, output, and outcome factors. This study is very valuable and will contribute to a lot of literature, especially related to the development of distance pedagogy in STEM learning.
基于问题的远程学习对STEM学生批判性思维认知风格的评价
数字技术的出现带来了教育领域的变革,从传统的面对面学习到远程学习。尽管发生了这种转变,但重要的是要优先发展STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)学生的批判性思维(CT)能力,作为21世纪成功的基本技能。本研究的目的是通过实施基于问题的远程学习(PBDL),通过考虑学生的认知风格,即领域独立和领域依赖,来评估科学、技术、工程和数学领域(STEM)学生的批判性思维(CT)技能。该研究采用了基于Kirkpatrick四级模型的评估和实验方法,该模型是在印度尼西亚东部一所提供STEM教育的大学进行的。为了评估学习、认知风格和批判性思维(CT)的不同组成部分,使用了一系列具有测试心理特征(效度和信度)的工具。采用描述性和统计分析的综合检查来评估结果。本研究的结果表明,基于问题的远程学习(PBDL)是提高STEM学生批判性思维(CT)技能的一种成功方法,无论他们的认知类型如何。本文详细讨论了投入、过程、产出和结果因素的全面检查。这项研究非常有价值,将有助于大量的文献,特别是与STEM学习远程教学的发展有关的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信