[Some properties of hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials].

T Tokushima, K Nagayama, T Tawaragi, H Hashimoto
{"title":"[Some properties of hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials].","authors":"T Tokushima,&nbsp;K Nagayama,&nbsp;T Tawaragi,&nbsp;H Hashimoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Addition-type silicone impression materials have the characteristic of low wetting by water; therefore, they are sometimes inconvenient in clinical use. However, hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials are said to be improved in this characteristic. In this study, the physical properties of two kinds of hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials, namely, Hydrophilic EXAFLEX and EXPRESS, were investigated and compared with the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. Compression set, strain in compression, consistency, and contact angles of the salivary droplet on the these impression materials were measured in accordance with ADAS no. 19. The following results were obtained: 1. Each compression set of HEM, HEL, EPM, EPL, EPE (hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials), having superior property in compression recovering, was less than 0.1%, they were equivalent to one-seventh of that of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. 2. Strain in compression of HEM, HEL, EPM, EPF was bigger than that of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. 3. Consistency of HEM, HEL, EPM, EPL, EPF was smaller in fluidity than that of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. Among all impression materials in this study, only with HEM and HEL could a difference in consistency between wet films and dry films be recognized. 4. Contact angles of all hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials were smaller than those of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. They were equivalent to two-thirds of that of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials, and improvement in wetting property of these hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77571,"journal":{"name":"Meikai Daigaku shigaku zasshi = The Journal of Meikai University School of Dentistry","volume":"18 2","pages":"205-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meikai Daigaku shigaku zasshi = The Journal of Meikai University School of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Addition-type silicone impression materials have the characteristic of low wetting by water; therefore, they are sometimes inconvenient in clinical use. However, hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials are said to be improved in this characteristic. In this study, the physical properties of two kinds of hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials, namely, Hydrophilic EXAFLEX and EXPRESS, were investigated and compared with the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. Compression set, strain in compression, consistency, and contact angles of the salivary droplet on the these impression materials were measured in accordance with ADAS no. 19. The following results were obtained: 1. Each compression set of HEM, HEL, EPM, EPL, EPE (hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials), having superior property in compression recovering, was less than 0.1%, they were equivalent to one-seventh of that of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. 2. Strain in compression of HEM, HEL, EPM, EPF was bigger than that of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. 3. Consistency of HEM, HEL, EPM, EPL, EPF was smaller in fluidity than that of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. Among all impression materials in this study, only with HEM and HEL could a difference in consistency between wet films and dry films be recognized. 4. Contact angles of all hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials were smaller than those of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials. They were equivalent to two-thirds of that of the traditional addition-type silicone impression materials, and improvement in wetting property of these hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials was observed.

[亲水加成型硅酮压印材料的一些性能]。
加入型硅酮压印材料具有低受水润湿性的特点;因此,它们在临床使用中有时不方便。然而,亲水加成型硅酮压印材料据说在这一特性上有所改善。本研究考察了亲水性EXAFLEX和EXPRESS两种亲水性加成型硅酮压印材料的物理性能,并与传统加成型硅酮压印材料进行了比较。根据ADAS no. 1的规定,测量了唾液滴在这些压印材料上的压缩集、压缩应变、稠度和接触角。19. 得到了以下结果:1。HEM、HEL、EPM、EPL、EPE(亲水性加成型硅酮压印材料)的每组压缩回收率均小于0.1%,相当于传统加成型硅酮压印材料的七分之一。2. HEM、HEL、EPM、EPF的压缩应变大于传统的添加型硅酮压印材料。3.HEM、HEL、EPM、EPL、EPF在流动性上的一致性小于传统的加入型硅酮压印材料。在本研究的所有印模材料中,只有HEM和HEL才能识别湿膜和干膜的稠度差异。4. 所有亲水加成型硅酮压印材料的接触角均小于传统加成型硅酮压印材料。其润湿性能相当于传统加成型硅酮压印材料的三分之二,并观察到这些亲水加成型硅酮压印材料的润湿性能有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信