[Etiological study of relationship between impacted permanent teeth and malocclusion].

Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai shi Pub Date : 1989-12-01
K Nagahara, S Yuasa, A Yamada, K Ito, O Watanabe, T Iizuka, M Sakai, H Utida
{"title":"[Etiological study of relationship between impacted permanent teeth and malocclusion].","authors":"K Nagahara,&nbsp;S Yuasa,&nbsp;A Yamada,&nbsp;K Ito,&nbsp;O Watanabe,&nbsp;T Iizuka,&nbsp;M Sakai,&nbsp;H Utida","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This investigation was undertaken to determine the causes of impacted permanent teeth and whether they have any influence on dentition, occlusion and skeletal patterns. The materials used were dental X-rays, occlusal dental X-rays, panoramic radiograms and cephalograms and dental casts of 194 cases (51 males and 143 females) which revealed impacted permanent teeth among 3979 cases (1215 males and 2764 females) from 1964 to 1985 in the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University. The results obtained were as follows: 1. The incidence of impacted permanent teeth in these samples was 4.9% of the entire number of orthodontic patients. There was no significant difference between sexes. 2. The incidence according to the number of impacted permanent teeth was as follows: one impacted tooth, 74.8%; two impacted teeth; 21.1%, three impacted teeth; 3.6%, four impacted teeth; 0.5%. The incidence of two symmetrically impacted teeth was 61.5%. 3. As to the type of impacted teeth, the frequency of maxillary central incisors was the largest (33.7%), followed by 3 (25.0%), 5 (22.2%), 5 (11.9%), 2 (4.4%), 3 (1.2%), 4 (0.8%), 4 (0.4%), and 7 (0.4%). But no impacted teeth were found in the regions of 1, 2, 6, 6, 7 and 7. 4. As to impacted teeth and the type of malocclusion, the spaced arch in the anterior region had impacted teeth most frequently followed by crowding, open bite and lateral cross bite. Malocclusions with the smallest incidence were cross bite and upper protrusion. The spaced arch had a higher incidence of impacted teeth than bimaxillary protrusion. In the posterior region (impacted molar teeth), the lateral cross bite, spaced arch, and upper protrusion had impacted molars most frequently, crowding was second and cross bite had the least. 5. In the direction of long axis, the impacted tooth with a horizontal direction was found most frequently (35.2%), followed in the order of frequency by inverse direction (32.7%), labial or mesial tipping (22.0%), lingual or distal tipping (5.7%), and right-angled (4.4%). Moreover, the inverse maxillary central incisor and mesially tipped maxillary canine were found most frequently. The frequency of maxillary central incisors with crooked roots was 64.7%, which was higher than that of maxillary canines (19.0%). 6. Lack of space is the most frequently found cause of impacted teeth, and in the anterior region this was the main cause of canine impacted teeth. Eruption impediment by supernumerary teeth and trauma were found to be characteristic causes of anterior impacted teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":75458,"journal":{"name":"Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai shi","volume":"27 4","pages":"913-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai shi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This investigation was undertaken to determine the causes of impacted permanent teeth and whether they have any influence on dentition, occlusion and skeletal patterns. The materials used were dental X-rays, occlusal dental X-rays, panoramic radiograms and cephalograms and dental casts of 194 cases (51 males and 143 females) which revealed impacted permanent teeth among 3979 cases (1215 males and 2764 females) from 1964 to 1985 in the Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University. The results obtained were as follows: 1. The incidence of impacted permanent teeth in these samples was 4.9% of the entire number of orthodontic patients. There was no significant difference between sexes. 2. The incidence according to the number of impacted permanent teeth was as follows: one impacted tooth, 74.8%; two impacted teeth; 21.1%, three impacted teeth; 3.6%, four impacted teeth; 0.5%. The incidence of two symmetrically impacted teeth was 61.5%. 3. As to the type of impacted teeth, the frequency of maxillary central incisors was the largest (33.7%), followed by 3 (25.0%), 5 (22.2%), 5 (11.9%), 2 (4.4%), 3 (1.2%), 4 (0.8%), 4 (0.4%), and 7 (0.4%). But no impacted teeth were found in the regions of 1, 2, 6, 6, 7 and 7. 4. As to impacted teeth and the type of malocclusion, the spaced arch in the anterior region had impacted teeth most frequently followed by crowding, open bite and lateral cross bite. Malocclusions with the smallest incidence were cross bite and upper protrusion. The spaced arch had a higher incidence of impacted teeth than bimaxillary protrusion. In the posterior region (impacted molar teeth), the lateral cross bite, spaced arch, and upper protrusion had impacted molars most frequently, crowding was second and cross bite had the least. 5. In the direction of long axis, the impacted tooth with a horizontal direction was found most frequently (35.2%), followed in the order of frequency by inverse direction (32.7%), labial or mesial tipping (22.0%), lingual or distal tipping (5.7%), and right-angled (4.4%). Moreover, the inverse maxillary central incisor and mesially tipped maxillary canine were found most frequently. The frequency of maxillary central incisors with crooked roots was 64.7%, which was higher than that of maxillary canines (19.0%). 6. Lack of space is the most frequently found cause of impacted teeth, and in the anterior region this was the main cause of canine impacted teeth. Eruption impediment by supernumerary teeth and trauma were found to be characteristic causes of anterior impacted teeth.

阻生恒牙与错牙合关系的病因学研究
进行这项调查是为了确定影响恒牙的原因,以及它们是否对牙列、咬合和骨骼模式有任何影响。资料来源为爱知学院口腔医学院正畸科1964 ~ 1985年共3979例(男1215例,女2764例)的口腔x线片、牙合x线片、全景式x线片、头颅x线片及牙模,共194例(男51例,女143例)。实验结果如下:1。这些样本中阻生恒牙的发生率为全部正畸患者的4.9%。性别间无显著差异。2. 按阻生恒牙个数的发生率:1颗阻生恒牙占74.8%;两颗阻生牙;21.1%, 3颗阻生牙;3.6%, 4颗阻生牙;0.5%。双牙对称阻生发生率为61.5%。3.在阻生牙类型中,上颌中切牙最多(33.7%),其次为3(25.0%)、5(22.2%)、5(11.9%)、2(4.4%)、3(1.2%)、4(0.8%)、4(0.4%)、7(0.4%)。1、2、6、6、7、7区未见阻生牙。4. 从阻生牙和错牙合类型来看,前牙区间隔弓最常发生阻生牙,其次是拥挤型、开型和侧交叉型。错牙合发生率最低的是交叉咬合和上牙突。间隙弓的阻生牙发生率高于双颌前突。后牙区(阻生磨牙)中,侧交叉咬合、间隔弓和上突磨牙发生阻生磨牙最多,其次为拥挤,十字咬合最少。5. 在长轴方向上,水平方向的阻生牙最多(35.2%),其次是反方向(32.7%),其次是唇部或中端倾斜(22.0%),其次是舌部或远端倾斜(5.7%),最后是直角方向倾斜(4.4%)。上颌中切牙和上颌中尖尖犬齿最常见。上颌中切牙牙根弯曲的发生率为64.7%,高于上颌犬齿(19.0%)。6. 缺乏空间是最常见的阻生牙的原因,并在前区,这是主要原因,犬阻生牙。前阻生牙的主要原因是外生牙和外伤所致的出牙障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信