Fraudulent Financial Reporting Indications In Banking Before And During The COVID-19 Pandemic

None Falsa Dzaky Arifian, None Indira Januarti
{"title":"Fraudulent Financial Reporting Indications In Banking Before And During The COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"None Falsa Dzaky Arifian, None Indira Januarti","doi":"10.24912/ja.v27i3.1701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyses indications of banking fraudulent financial reporting (FFR) before and during COVID-19. FFR indications are seen using the fraud pentagon theory through pressure (liquidity), opportunity (effective monitoring), rationalization (external auditor quality), competence (managerial ability), and arrogance (prominence of the CEO's photograph). This research was conducted on banks in the IDX from 2018 to 2021. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling method, consisting of 76 observations before COVID-19 (2018 to 2019) and 81 observations during COVID-19 (2020 to 2021). The analysis tool uses OLS regression. The results showed that rationalization negatively affects FFR indications before and during COVID-19, while competence had a positive effect only before COVID-19. The pressure, opportunity, and arrogance couldn’t indicate FFR before and during COVID-19. This research has implications for good auditor quality and managerial ability that can assist banks and regulators in building anti-fraud programs for preventing, detecting, and investigating FFR.","PeriodicalId":55796,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Akuntansi","volume":"2018 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Akuntansi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v27i3.1701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study analyses indications of banking fraudulent financial reporting (FFR) before and during COVID-19. FFR indications are seen using the fraud pentagon theory through pressure (liquidity), opportunity (effective monitoring), rationalization (external auditor quality), competence (managerial ability), and arrogance (prominence of the CEO's photograph). This research was conducted on banks in the IDX from 2018 to 2021. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling method, consisting of 76 observations before COVID-19 (2018 to 2019) and 81 observations during COVID-19 (2020 to 2021). The analysis tool uses OLS regression. The results showed that rationalization negatively affects FFR indications before and during COVID-19, while competence had a positive effect only before COVID-19. The pressure, opportunity, and arrogance couldn’t indicate FFR before and during COVID-19. This research has implications for good auditor quality and managerial ability that can assist banks and regulators in building anti-fraud programs for preventing, detecting, and investigating FFR.
2019冠状病毒病大流行之前和期间银行业的财务报告欺诈迹象
本研究分析了COVID-19之前和期间银行欺诈性财务报告(FFR)的迹象。利用欺诈五边形理论,可以通过压力(流动性)、机会(有效监控)、合理化(外部审计师的质量)、能力(管理能力)和傲慢(CEO照片的突出位置)看到FFR的迹象。这项研究是在2018年至2021年期间对IDX的银行进行的。采用目的抽样方法选取样本,包括2018 - 2019年疫情前的76个观测点和2020 - 2021年疫情期间的81个观测点。分析工具使用OLS回归。结果显示,合理化对FFR指征有负向影响,而能力仅对COVID-19前的FFR指征有正向影响。压力、机会和傲慢都不能代表新冠肺炎之前和期间的FFR。本研究对良好的审计师素质和管理能力具有启示意义,可以帮助银行和监管机构建立反欺诈计划,以预防、发现和调查FFR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信