Kant on punishment and poverty

IF 0.8 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1111/sjp.12536

Nicholas Hadsell

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract I offer a Kantian argument for the idea that the state lacks the authority to punish neglected, impoverished citizens when they commit crimes to cope with that neglect. Given Kant's own commitments to the value of external freedom and the state's obligation to ensure it, there is no reason a Kantian state can claim authority to punish an impoverished citizen while also failing in significant ways to protect her external freedom.

查看原文本刊更多论文

康德关于惩罚和贫穷的观点

我提出了一个康德式的观点，即当被忽视的贫困公民为了应对这种忽视而犯罪时，国家缺乏惩罚他们的权力。考虑到康德自己对外部自由价值的承诺和国家确保自由的义务，康德式的国家没有理由声称有权惩罚一个贫困的公民，同时又不能以重大方式保护她的外部自由。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Southern Journal of Philosophy has long provided a forum for the expression of philosophical ideas and welcome articles written from all philosophical perspectives, including both the analytic and continental traditions, as well as the history of philosophy. This commitment to philosophical pluralism is reflected in the long list of notable figures whose work has appeared in the journal, including Hans-Georg Gadamer, Hubert Dreyfus, George Santayana, Wilfrid Sellars, and Richard Sorabji.