A learning journey into contemporary bioregionalism

IF 4.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Samuel Wearne, Ella Hubbard, Krisztina Jónás, Maria Wilke
{"title":"A learning journey into contemporary bioregionalism","authors":"Samuel Wearne, Ella Hubbard, Krisztina Jónás, Maria Wilke","doi":"10.1002/pan3.10548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Bioregioning is a new wave of bioregional discourse that appears to be attracting interest among sustainability researchers and practitioners. Through interviews with contemporary leaders and a reflexive research process, we explored bioregioning experiences across seven countries. Our paper outlines the motivations, practices and narratives that we encountered and positions these observations against prior expressions of bioregional thought and broader themes in sustainability research. We found that in bioregioning, the concept of a bioregion remains important and seems to attract people to the discourse in three ways: It inspires visions of the future that encompass more‐than‐human thriving, it creates a conceptual container that enables a strategic narrative for change that connects places to larger scales, and it justifies the importance of everyday people exercising their right to ‘do’ something. The combination of these motivators shows bioregioning's relationship with earlier expressions of bioregional thought: Like early bioregional thinkers, regional scales carry cognitive and strategic appeal, and like critical bioregionalism, power and justice are foregrounded to ensure the process of change is ethical. We suggest that in the shift to bioregioning, the bioregion serves as a boundary device, justifying (for some) a focus on regional scale action which has made bioregional discourse unique, and for others, rationalising participatory or emotional priorities. This lets bioregioning enact a dialogic approach to change and enables practitioners to consider questions of scale in open dialogue with emotive place‐based dynamics, bringing nature re‐connection and social–ecological systems research into consideration and overlap with the practice of bioregioning. We observed parallels between our research process and the central features in bioregioning; both respond to ambitions and calls within sustainability to enact relational values and surface contextualised knowledge while also valuing generalisations and abstraction. Our study, we suggest, provides one example of how research into human–nature relationships in Western sustainability might be pursued in line with these ambitions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.","PeriodicalId":52850,"journal":{"name":"People and Nature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"People and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10548","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Bioregioning is a new wave of bioregional discourse that appears to be attracting interest among sustainability researchers and practitioners. Through interviews with contemporary leaders and a reflexive research process, we explored bioregioning experiences across seven countries. Our paper outlines the motivations, practices and narratives that we encountered and positions these observations against prior expressions of bioregional thought and broader themes in sustainability research. We found that in bioregioning, the concept of a bioregion remains important and seems to attract people to the discourse in three ways: It inspires visions of the future that encompass more‐than‐human thriving, it creates a conceptual container that enables a strategic narrative for change that connects places to larger scales, and it justifies the importance of everyday people exercising their right to ‘do’ something. The combination of these motivators shows bioregioning's relationship with earlier expressions of bioregional thought: Like early bioregional thinkers, regional scales carry cognitive and strategic appeal, and like critical bioregionalism, power and justice are foregrounded to ensure the process of change is ethical. We suggest that in the shift to bioregioning, the bioregion serves as a boundary device, justifying (for some) a focus on regional scale action which has made bioregional discourse unique, and for others, rationalising participatory or emotional priorities. This lets bioregioning enact a dialogic approach to change and enables practitioners to consider questions of scale in open dialogue with emotive place‐based dynamics, bringing nature re‐connection and social–ecological systems research into consideration and overlap with the practice of bioregioning. We observed parallels between our research process and the central features in bioregioning; both respond to ambitions and calls within sustainability to enact relational values and surface contextualised knowledge while also valuing generalisations and abstraction. Our study, we suggest, provides one example of how research into human–nature relationships in Western sustainability might be pursued in line with these ambitions. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
当代生物地域性的学习之旅
摘要生物区域划分是生物区域话语的新浪潮,引起了可持续性研究人员和实践者的兴趣。通过对当代领导人的采访和反思性研究过程,我们探索了七个国家的生物区划经验。我们的论文概述了我们遇到的动机、实践和叙述,并将这些观察结果与之前的生物区域思想表达和可持续性研究中更广泛的主题进行了对比。我们发现,在生物区域划分中,生物区域的概念仍然很重要,似乎以三种方式吸引人们参与讨论:它激发了对未来的愿景,不仅包括人类的繁荣,它创造了一个概念性的容器,使变革的战略叙事能够将地方与更大的尺度联系起来,它证明了日常人们行使“做”某事的权利的重要性。这些激励因素的结合显示了生物区域划分与早期生物区域思想表达的关系:与早期生物区域思想家一样,区域尺度具有认知和战略吸引力;与批判生物区域主义一样,权力和正义被强调,以确保变化过程是合乎伦理的。我们建议,在向生物区域划分的转变中,生物区域作为一种边界装置,证明(对某些人来说)关注区域规模行动是合理的,这使得生物区域话语变得独特,而对其他人来说,使参与或情感优先事项合理化。这使得生物区域划分制定了一种对话的方法来改变,使从业者能够在开放的对话中考虑规模问题,以情感为基础的动态,将自然再连接和社会生态系统研究纳入考虑范围,并与生物区域划分的实践相重叠。我们观察到我们的研究过程和生物区域划分的核心特征之间的相似之处;两者都响应可持续性的雄心和呼吁,制定关系价值和表面情境化知识,同时也重视概括和抽象。我们认为,我们的研究提供了一个例子,说明如何在西方可持续发展中进行人与自然关系的研究,以符合这些雄心壮志。在《华尔街日报》博客上阅读免费的《简明语言摘要》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
People and Nature
People and Nature Multiple-
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
103
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信