Which inflammatory marker might be the best indicator for sacroiliitis?

IF 0.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Melike Elif Kalfaoglu, Zeliha Cosgun
{"title":"Which inflammatory marker might be the best indicator for sacroiliitis?","authors":"Melike Elif Kalfaoglu, Zeliha Cosgun","doi":"10.1002/prm2.12118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aimed to investigate the potential of inflammatory markers, including platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio (LMR), and C‐reactive protein‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (CLR), in identifying sacroiliitis. Present retrospective study was conducted at the Abant Izzet Baysal University Hospital, including patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis between August 2020 and March 2023. Control subjects with normal sacroiliac joints were also included. Sacroiliitis patients were further categorized into active and chronic sacroiliitis groups. Demographic data and laboratory characteristics, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), and various blood parameters, were recorded. Inflammatory markers were calculated, including PLR, NLR, LMR, and CLR. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the study groups and evaluate the diagnostic performance of these markers. A total of 226 subjects, including 132 sacroiliitis patients and 94 control subjects, were included in the study. Serum CRP levels were significantly higher in sacroiliitis patients compared to the control group. NLR, PLR, and CLR values were elevated in sacroiliitis patients, while LMR was decreased. There were significant correlations between these markers and established inflammatory markers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance for NLR, PLR, LMR and CLR in detecting sacroiliitis. Inflammatory markers, specifically NLR, PLR, LMR and CLR, showed significant differences between sacroiliitis patients and the control group. In addition PLR is useful in distinguishing active and chronic sacroiliitis. These markers, in conjunction with established inflammatory markers, may serve as supportive diagnostic tools for sacroiliitis.","PeriodicalId":40071,"journal":{"name":"Precision Medical Sciences","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prm2.12118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to investigate the potential of inflammatory markers, including platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio (LMR), and C‐reactive protein‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (CLR), in identifying sacroiliitis. Present retrospective study was conducted at the Abant Izzet Baysal University Hospital, including patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis between August 2020 and March 2023. Control subjects with normal sacroiliac joints were also included. Sacroiliitis patients were further categorized into active and chronic sacroiliitis groups. Demographic data and laboratory characteristics, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C‐reactive protein (CRP), and various blood parameters, were recorded. Inflammatory markers were calculated, including PLR, NLR, LMR, and CLR. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the study groups and evaluate the diagnostic performance of these markers. A total of 226 subjects, including 132 sacroiliitis patients and 94 control subjects, were included in the study. Serum CRP levels were significantly higher in sacroiliitis patients compared to the control group. NLR, PLR, and CLR values were elevated in sacroiliitis patients, while LMR was decreased. There were significant correlations between these markers and established inflammatory markers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance for NLR, PLR, LMR and CLR in detecting sacroiliitis. Inflammatory markers, specifically NLR, PLR, LMR and CLR, showed significant differences between sacroiliitis patients and the control group. In addition PLR is useful in distinguishing active and chronic sacroiliitis. These markers, in conjunction with established inflammatory markers, may serve as supportive diagnostic tools for sacroiliitis.
哪个炎症标志物可能是骶髂炎的最佳指标?
摘要本研究旨在探讨炎症标志物,包括血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)和C反应蛋白与淋巴细胞比值(CLR)在识别骶髂炎中的潜力。本回顾性研究在Abant Izzet Baysal大学医院进行,包括2020年8月至2023年3月期间诊断为骶髂炎的患者。骶髂关节正常的对照组也包括在内。骶髂炎患者进一步分为活动性和慢性骶髂炎组。记录人口统计数据和实验室特征,如红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)和各种血液参数。计算炎症标志物,包括PLR、NLR、LMR和CLR。进行统计学分析比较各研究组,并评价这些标志物的诊断性能。本研究共纳入226例受试者,其中骶髂炎患者132例,对照组94例。骶髂炎患者血清CRP水平明显高于对照组。骶髂炎患者NLR、PLR和CLR值升高,而LMR降低。这些标志物与已建立的炎症标志物之间存在显著相关性。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示NLR、PLR、LMR和CLR在诊断骶髂炎方面表现中等。炎性指标,特别是NLR、PLR、LMR和CLR在骶髂炎患者与对照组之间存在显著差异。此外,PLR可用于区分活动性和慢性骶髂炎。这些标志物,结合已建立的炎症标志物,可作为骶髂炎的支持性诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Precision Medical Sciences
Precision Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信