Silvopastoral systems benefit invertebrate biodiversity on tropical livestock farms in Caquetá, Colombia

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Lois Kinneen, María Paula Escobar, Luis Miguel Hernandez, Jill Thompson, Yardany Ramos-Pastrana, Eric Córdoba-Suarez, Miguel Romero-Sanchez, Andrew Barnes, Marcela Quintero, Michael P. D. Garratt
{"title":"Silvopastoral systems benefit invertebrate biodiversity on tropical livestock farms in Caquetá, Colombia","authors":"Lois Kinneen,&nbsp;María Paula Escobar,&nbsp;Luis Miguel Hernandez,&nbsp;Jill Thompson,&nbsp;Yardany Ramos-Pastrana,&nbsp;Eric Córdoba-Suarez,&nbsp;Miguel Romero-Sanchez,&nbsp;Andrew Barnes,&nbsp;Marcela Quintero,&nbsp;Michael P. D. Garratt","doi":"10.1111/afe.12594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <div>\n <ol>\n \n <li>In the Colombian Amazon, there has been long-term and sustained loss of primary forest threatening biodiversity and climate change mitigation. Silvopastoral practices that integrate trees into livestock production could help address both local economic and wider environmental challenges.</li>\n \n <li>We aimed to assess the effects of silvopastoral practices on invertebrate communities on smallholder farms in Caquetá, Colombia. Using sweep nets and malaise trapping, invertebrate communities were compared between traditional pasture, silvopasture and forest edge habitats.</li>\n \n <li>Invertebrate communities collected using sweep nets were contrasting among habitat types, communities were significantly different between traditional pasture and forest edge habitats and diversity and evenness were greatest in forest edges compared to traditional pastures. It appears that silvopasture areas, by supporting similar invertebrate assemblages to both traditional pasture and forest edges, may be acting as an intermediate habitat.</li>\n \n <li>When individual invertebrate orders were compared, Lepidoptera and Coleoptera were found in greater abundance in the forest edge habitats, while Hemiptera were more abundant in traditional pasture. Hemipterans are often pests of forage plants in pasture systems and these differences in abundance may have implications for ecosystem services and disservices.</li>\n \n <li>Silvopastoral approaches cannot replace the unique biodiversity supported by native forests but could deliver benefits for invertebrate conservation and ecosystem services if integrated into landscapes.</li>\n </ol>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7454,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Entomology","volume":"26 1","pages":"126-134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/afe.12594","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/afe.12594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  1. In the Colombian Amazon, there has been long-term and sustained loss of primary forest threatening biodiversity and climate change mitigation. Silvopastoral practices that integrate trees into livestock production could help address both local economic and wider environmental challenges.
  2. We aimed to assess the effects of silvopastoral practices on invertebrate communities on smallholder farms in Caquetá, Colombia. Using sweep nets and malaise trapping, invertebrate communities were compared between traditional pasture, silvopasture and forest edge habitats.
  3. Invertebrate communities collected using sweep nets were contrasting among habitat types, communities were significantly different between traditional pasture and forest edge habitats and diversity and evenness were greatest in forest edges compared to traditional pastures. It appears that silvopasture areas, by supporting similar invertebrate assemblages to both traditional pasture and forest edges, may be acting as an intermediate habitat.
  4. When individual invertebrate orders were compared, Lepidoptera and Coleoptera were found in greater abundance in the forest edge habitats, while Hemiptera were more abundant in traditional pasture. Hemipterans are often pests of forage plants in pasture systems and these differences in abundance may have implications for ecosystem services and disservices.
  5. Silvopastoral approaches cannot replace the unique biodiversity supported by native forests but could deliver benefits for invertebrate conservation and ecosystem services if integrated into landscapes.

Abstract Image

林牧系统有利于哥伦比亚卡克塔热带畜牧场的无脊椎动物生物多样性
在哥伦比亚亚马逊地区,原始森林长期持续减少,威胁着生物多样性和气候变化的减缓。将树木纳入畜牧业生产的造林放牧法有助于应对当地经济和更广泛的环境挑战。 我们旨在评估造林放牧实践对哥伦比亚卡克塔小农农场无脊椎动物群落的影响。我们使用扫网和诱捕法对传统牧场、造林牧场和森林边缘栖息地的无脊椎动物群落进行了比较。 使用扫网收集到的无脊椎动物群落在不同生境类型之间形成了鲜明对比,传统牧场和森林边缘生境之间的群落差异显著,森林边缘的多样性和均匀度与传统牧场相比最高。由此看来,造林牧场地区与传统牧场和森林边缘栖息地的无脊椎动物群落相似,可能是一种中间栖息地。 在比较各个无脊椎动物门类时发现,森林边缘栖息地的鳞翅目和鞘翅目无脊椎动物数量更多,而传统牧场的半翅目无脊椎动物数量更多。半翅目昆虫通常是牧场系统中饲料植物的害虫,这些丰度上的差异可能会对生态系统服务和非服务产生影响。 造林放牧方法不能取代原始森林所支持的独特生物多样性,但如果与景观相结合,则可为无脊椎动物保护和生态系统服务带来益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural and Forest Entomology
Agricultural and Forest Entomology 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Entomology provides a multi-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers can present their work on all aspects of agricultural and forest entomology to other researchers, policy makers and professionals. The Journal welcomes primary research papers, reviews and short communications on entomological research relevant to the control of insect and other arthropod pests. We invite high quality original research papers on the biology, population dynamics, impact and management of pests of the full range of forest, agricultural and horticultural crops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信