Environmental regulation and de-zombified governance of heavy polluting enterprises: Quasi-natural experiment of the China's New Environmental Protection Law

IF 4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Xiuying Chen, Haiming Lan, Sheng Liu, Jianbin Li
{"title":"Environmental regulation and de-zombified governance of heavy polluting enterprises: Quasi-natural experiment of the China's New Environmental Protection Law","authors":"Xiuying Chen, Haiming Lan, Sheng Liu, Jianbin Li","doi":"10.1177/0958305x231205514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Removing backward production capacity and clearing out zombie enterprises is crucial to realize the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. However, as a command-control environmental regulation policy, whether the New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) can guide heavy-polluting enterprises to achieve green transformation and get rid of the zombified risk remains unknown. Our article applies the difference-in-difference (DID) method to explore the impact of the stricter environmental regulation policies on the de-zombification of heavily polluting enterprises in the context of the implementation of NEPL in China. The results show that the implementation of NEPL significantly reduces the zombified risk of heavy-polluting enterprises. The results were valid by a series of robustness tests of propensity score matching, common trends test, placebos test, conducting double clustered standard errors to industry and province level, eliminating other policy interference, ruling out reverse causation, easing the potential endogeneity problems, and controlling enterprise's internal management level. Furthermore, there is a time lag in NEPL policy, which requires a long-term mechanism. Moreover, the NEPL can promote enterprise de-zombie governance through the mechanism of market competition and market allocation. The effects of the NEPL are heterogeneous due to the nature of enterprise property rights, enterprise scale, industry radiation capacity, regional development level, and internal management capacity. This article provides policy implications for developing countries to promote de-zombified governance of their economic systems and defuse risks of green transition.","PeriodicalId":11652,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231205514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Removing backward production capacity and clearing out zombie enterprises is crucial to realize the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals. However, as a command-control environmental regulation policy, whether the New Environmental Protection Law (NEPL) can guide heavy-polluting enterprises to achieve green transformation and get rid of the zombified risk remains unknown. Our article applies the difference-in-difference (DID) method to explore the impact of the stricter environmental regulation policies on the de-zombification of heavily polluting enterprises in the context of the implementation of NEPL in China. The results show that the implementation of NEPL significantly reduces the zombified risk of heavy-polluting enterprises. The results were valid by a series of robustness tests of propensity score matching, common trends test, placebos test, conducting double clustered standard errors to industry and province level, eliminating other policy interference, ruling out reverse causation, easing the potential endogeneity problems, and controlling enterprise's internal management level. Furthermore, there is a time lag in NEPL policy, which requires a long-term mechanism. Moreover, the NEPL can promote enterprise de-zombie governance through the mechanism of market competition and market allocation. The effects of the NEPL are heterogeneous due to the nature of enterprise property rights, enterprise scale, industry radiation capacity, regional development level, and internal management capacity. This article provides policy implications for developing countries to promote de-zombified governance of their economic systems and defuse risks of green transition.
环境规制与重污染企业去僵尸化治理:中国新环境保护法的准自然实验
淘汰落后产能、清理僵尸企业是实现碳调峰和碳中和目标的关键。然而,新《环境保护法》作为一项命令控制型的环境监管政策,能否引导重污染企业实现绿色转型,摆脱僵尸化风险,仍是一个未知数。本文运用差分法(DID),在中国实施NEPL的背景下,探讨更严格的环境监管政策对重污染企业去僵尸化的影响。结果表明,实施NEPL显著降低了重污染企业的僵尸化风险。通过倾向得分匹配检验、共同趋势检验、安慰剂检验、对行业和省一级进行双聚类标准误差、消除其他政策干扰、排除反向因果关系、缓解潜在内质性问题、控制企业内部管理水平等一系列稳健性检验,结果有效。此外,NEPL政策存在时间滞后,这需要一个长期的机制。此外,NEPL可以通过市场竞争和市场配置机制促进企业去僵尸治理。由于企业产权性质、企业规模性质、产业辐射能力性质、区域发展水平性质、内部管理能力等因素的影响,NEPL的效应具有异质性。本文为发展中国家促进其经济体系的去僵尸化治理和化解绿色转型风险提供了政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy & Environment
Energy & Environment ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: Energy & Environment is an interdisciplinary journal inviting energy policy analysts, natural scientists and engineers, as well as lawyers and economists to contribute to mutual understanding and learning, believing that better communication between experts will enhance the quality of policy, advance social well-being and help to reduce conflict. The journal encourages dialogue between the social sciences as energy demand and supply are observed and analysed with reference to politics of policy-making and implementation. The rapidly evolving social and environmental impacts of energy supply, transport, production and use at all levels require contribution from many disciplines if policy is to be effective. In particular E & E invite contributions from the study of policy delivery, ultimately more important than policy formation. The geopolitics of energy are also important, as are the impacts of environmental regulations and advancing technologies on national and local politics, and even global energy politics. Energy & Environment is a forum for constructive, professional information sharing, as well as debate across disciplines and professions, including the financial sector. Mathematical articles are outside the scope of Energy & Environment. The broader policy implications of submitted research should be addressed and environmental implications, not just emission quantities, be discussed with reference to scientific assumptions. This applies especially to technical papers based on arguments suggested by other disciplines, funding bodies or directly by policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信