The Last Decade in Review: Tracing the Evolution of Safety Assurance Cases through a Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis

Sivakumar, Mithila, Belle, Alvine Boaye, Shan, Jinjun, Adesina, Opeyemi, Wang, Song, Chechik, Marsha, Fokaefs, Marios, Shahandashti, Kimya Khakzad, Odu, Oluwafemi
{"title":"The Last Decade in Review: Tracing the Evolution of Safety Assurance\n Cases through a Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Sivakumar, Mithila, Belle, Alvine Boaye, Shan, Jinjun, Adesina, Opeyemi, Wang, Song, Chechik, Marsha, Fokaefs, Marios, Shahandashti, Kimya Khakzad, Odu, Oluwafemi","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.07495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety assurance is of paramount importance across various domains, including automotive, aerospace, and nuclear energy, where the reliability and acceptability of mission-critical systems are imperative. This assurance is effectively realized through the utilization of Safety Assurance Cases. The use of safety assurance cases allows for verifying the correctness of the created systems capabilities, preventing system failure. The latter may result in loss of life, severe injuries, large-scale environmental damage, property destruction, and major economic loss. Still, the emergence of complex technologies such as cyber-physical systems (CPSs), characterized by their heterogeneity, autonomy, machine learning capabilities, and the uncertainty of their operational environments poses significant challenges for safety assurance activities. Several papers have tried to propose solutions to tackle these challenges, but to the best of our knowledge, no secondary study investigates the trends, patterns, and relationships characterizing the safety case scientific literature. This makes it difficult to have a holistic view of the safety case landscape and to identify the most promising future research directions. In this paper, we, therefore, rely on state-of-the-art bibliometric tools(e.g., VosViewer) to conduct a bibliometric analysis that allows us to generate valuable insights, identify key authors and venues, and gain a birds eye view of the current state of research in the safety assurance area. By revealing knowledge gaps and highlighting potential avenues for future research, our analysis provides an essential foundation for researchers, corporate safety analysts, and regulators seeking to embrace or enhance safety practices that align with their specific needs and objectives.","PeriodicalId":496270,"journal":{"name":"arXiv (Cornell University)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv (Cornell University)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2311.07495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety assurance is of paramount importance across various domains, including automotive, aerospace, and nuclear energy, where the reliability and acceptability of mission-critical systems are imperative. This assurance is effectively realized through the utilization of Safety Assurance Cases. The use of safety assurance cases allows for verifying the correctness of the created systems capabilities, preventing system failure. The latter may result in loss of life, severe injuries, large-scale environmental damage, property destruction, and major economic loss. Still, the emergence of complex technologies such as cyber-physical systems (CPSs), characterized by their heterogeneity, autonomy, machine learning capabilities, and the uncertainty of their operational environments poses significant challenges for safety assurance activities. Several papers have tried to propose solutions to tackle these challenges, but to the best of our knowledge, no secondary study investigates the trends, patterns, and relationships characterizing the safety case scientific literature. This makes it difficult to have a holistic view of the safety case landscape and to identify the most promising future research directions. In this paper, we, therefore, rely on state-of-the-art bibliometric tools(e.g., VosViewer) to conduct a bibliometric analysis that allows us to generate valuable insights, identify key authors and venues, and gain a birds eye view of the current state of research in the safety assurance area. By revealing knowledge gaps and highlighting potential avenues for future research, our analysis provides an essential foundation for researchers, corporate safety analysts, and regulators seeking to embrace or enhance safety practices that align with their specific needs and objectives.
回顾过去十年:通过综合文献计量分析追踪安全保障案例的演变
安全保证在各个领域都是至关重要的,包括汽车、航空航天和核能,在这些领域,关键任务系统的可靠性和可接受性是必不可少的。通过安全保障案例的运用,有效地实现了安全保障。安全保证案例的使用允许验证所创建的系统功能的正确性,防止系统故障。后者可能造成生命损失、严重伤害、大规模环境破坏、财产破坏和重大经济损失。尽管如此,网络物理系统(cps)等复杂技术的出现,以其异质性、自主性、机器学习能力和操作环境的不确定性为特征,给安全保障活动带来了重大挑战。一些论文试图提出解决这些挑战的解决方案,但据我们所知,没有二次研究调查安全案例科学文献的趋势、模式和关系。这使得很难对安全案例景观有一个整体的看法,并确定最有希望的未来研究方向。因此,在本文中,我们依赖于最先进的文献计量工具(例如。(VosViewer)进行文献计量分析,使我们能够产生有价值的见解,确定关键作者和地点,并获得安全保障领域研究现状的鸟瞰图。通过揭示知识差距和强调未来研究的潜在途径,我们的分析为研究人员、企业安全分析师和监管机构寻求接受或加强符合其特定需求和目标的安全实践提供了重要的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信