Deep Learning Benchmark for First Break Detection from Hardrock Seismic Reflection Data

IF 3 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Geophysics Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1190/geo2022-0741.1
Pierre-Luc St-Charles, Bruno Rousseau, Joumana Ghosn, Gilles Bellefleur, Ernst Schetselaar
{"title":"Deep Learning Benchmark for First Break Detection from Hardrock Seismic Reflection Data","authors":"Pierre-Luc St-Charles, Bruno Rousseau, Joumana Ghosn, Gilles Bellefleur, Ernst Schetselaar","doi":"10.1190/geo2022-0741.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep learning techniques are used to tackle a variety of tasks related to seismic data processing and interpretation. While many works have shown the benefits of deep learning, assessing the generalization capabilities of proposed methods to data acquired in different conditions and geological environments remains challenging. This is especially true for applications in hardrock environments where seismic surveys are still relatively rare. The primary factors that impede the adoption of machine learning in geosciences include the lack of publicly available and labeled datasets, and the use of inadequate evaluation methodologies. Since machine learning models are prone to overfit and underperform when the data used to train them is site-specific, the applicability of these models on new survey data that could be considered “out-of-distribution” is rarely addressed. This is unfortunate, as evaluating predictive models in out-of-distribution settings can provide a good insight into their usefulness in real-world use cases. To tackle these issues, we propose a simple benchmarking methodology for first break picking to evaluate the transferability of deep learning models that are trained across different environments and acquisition conditions. For this, we consider a reflection seismic survey dataset acquired at five distinct hardrock mining sites combined with annotations for first break picking. We train and evaluate a baseline deep learning solution based on a U-Net for future comparisons, and discuss potential improvements to this approach.","PeriodicalId":55102,"journal":{"name":"Geophysics","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0741.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning techniques are used to tackle a variety of tasks related to seismic data processing and interpretation. While many works have shown the benefits of deep learning, assessing the generalization capabilities of proposed methods to data acquired in different conditions and geological environments remains challenging. This is especially true for applications in hardrock environments where seismic surveys are still relatively rare. The primary factors that impede the adoption of machine learning in geosciences include the lack of publicly available and labeled datasets, and the use of inadequate evaluation methodologies. Since machine learning models are prone to overfit and underperform when the data used to train them is site-specific, the applicability of these models on new survey data that could be considered “out-of-distribution” is rarely addressed. This is unfortunate, as evaluating predictive models in out-of-distribution settings can provide a good insight into their usefulness in real-world use cases. To tackle these issues, we propose a simple benchmarking methodology for first break picking to evaluate the transferability of deep learning models that are trained across different environments and acquisition conditions. For this, we consider a reflection seismic survey dataset acquired at five distinct hardrock mining sites combined with annotations for first break picking. We train and evaluate a baseline deep learning solution based on a U-Net for future comparisons, and discuss potential improvements to this approach.
基于硬岩地震反射数据的首次裂缝检测的深度学习基准
深度学习技术被用于解决与地震数据处理和解释相关的各种任务。虽然许多研究都表明了深度学习的好处,但评估所提出的方法对不同条件和地质环境下获得的数据的泛化能力仍然具有挑战性。对于地震勘探相对较少的硬岩环境,这一点尤其适用。阻碍在地球科学中采用机器学习的主要因素包括缺乏公开可用和标记的数据集,以及使用不适当的评估方法。由于当用于训练机器学习模型的数据是特定于站点的时,机器学习模型容易过度拟合和表现不佳,因此这些模型在可能被认为是“分布外”的新调查数据上的适用性很少得到解决。这是不幸的,因为在分布外环境中评估预测模型可以很好地了解它们在实际用例中的有用性。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一个简单的基准测试方法,用于首次中断选择,以评估在不同环境和获取条件下训练的深度学习模型的可转移性。为此,我们考虑了在五个不同的硬岩矿区获得的反射地震调查数据集,并结合了首次断裂选择的注释。我们训练和评估了一个基于U-Net的基线深度学习解决方案,以便将来进行比较,并讨论了该方法的潜在改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geophysics
Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysics, published by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists since 1936, is an archival journal encompassing all aspects of research, exploration, and education in applied geophysics. Geophysics articles, generally more than 275 per year in six issues, cover the entire spectrum of geophysical methods, including seismology, potential fields, electromagnetics, and borehole measurements. Geophysics, a bimonthly, provides theoretical and mathematical tools needed to reproduce depicted work, encouraging further development and research. Geophysics papers, drawn from industry and academia, undergo a rigorous peer-review process to validate the described methods and conclusions and ensure the highest editorial and production quality. Geophysics editors strongly encourage the use of real data, including actual case histories, to highlight current technology and tutorials to stimulate ideas. Some issues feature a section of solicited papers on a particular subject of current interest. Recent special sections focused on seismic anisotropy, subsalt exploration and development, and microseismic monitoring. The PDF format of each Geophysics paper is the official version of record.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信