Pierre-Luc St-Charles, Bruno Rousseau, Joumana Ghosn, Gilles Bellefleur, Ernst Schetselaar
{"title":"Deep Learning Benchmark for First Break Detection from Hardrock Seismic Reflection Data","authors":"Pierre-Luc St-Charles, Bruno Rousseau, Joumana Ghosn, Gilles Bellefleur, Ernst Schetselaar","doi":"10.1190/geo2022-0741.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep learning techniques are used to tackle a variety of tasks related to seismic data processing and interpretation. While many works have shown the benefits of deep learning, assessing the generalization capabilities of proposed methods to data acquired in different conditions and geological environments remains challenging. This is especially true for applications in hardrock environments where seismic surveys are still relatively rare. The primary factors that impede the adoption of machine learning in geosciences include the lack of publicly available and labeled datasets, and the use of inadequate evaluation methodologies. Since machine learning models are prone to overfit and underperform when the data used to train them is site-specific, the applicability of these models on new survey data that could be considered “out-of-distribution” is rarely addressed. This is unfortunate, as evaluating predictive models in out-of-distribution settings can provide a good insight into their usefulness in real-world use cases. To tackle these issues, we propose a simple benchmarking methodology for first break picking to evaluate the transferability of deep learning models that are trained across different environments and acquisition conditions. For this, we consider a reflection seismic survey dataset acquired at five distinct hardrock mining sites combined with annotations for first break picking. We train and evaluate a baseline deep learning solution based on a U-Net for future comparisons, and discuss potential improvements to this approach.","PeriodicalId":55102,"journal":{"name":"Geophysics","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2022-0741.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deep learning techniques are used to tackle a variety of tasks related to seismic data processing and interpretation. While many works have shown the benefits of deep learning, assessing the generalization capabilities of proposed methods to data acquired in different conditions and geological environments remains challenging. This is especially true for applications in hardrock environments where seismic surveys are still relatively rare. The primary factors that impede the adoption of machine learning in geosciences include the lack of publicly available and labeled datasets, and the use of inadequate evaluation methodologies. Since machine learning models are prone to overfit and underperform when the data used to train them is site-specific, the applicability of these models on new survey data that could be considered “out-of-distribution” is rarely addressed. This is unfortunate, as evaluating predictive models in out-of-distribution settings can provide a good insight into their usefulness in real-world use cases. To tackle these issues, we propose a simple benchmarking methodology for first break picking to evaluate the transferability of deep learning models that are trained across different environments and acquisition conditions. For this, we consider a reflection seismic survey dataset acquired at five distinct hardrock mining sites combined with annotations for first break picking. We train and evaluate a baseline deep learning solution based on a U-Net for future comparisons, and discuss potential improvements to this approach.
期刊介绍:
Geophysics, published by the Society of Exploration Geophysicists since 1936, is an archival journal encompassing all aspects of research, exploration, and education in applied geophysics.
Geophysics articles, generally more than 275 per year in six issues, cover the entire spectrum of geophysical methods, including seismology, potential fields, electromagnetics, and borehole measurements. Geophysics, a bimonthly, provides theoretical and mathematical tools needed to reproduce depicted work, encouraging further development and research.
Geophysics papers, drawn from industry and academia, undergo a rigorous peer-review process to validate the described methods and conclusions and ensure the highest editorial and production quality. Geophysics editors strongly encourage the use of real data, including actual case histories, to highlight current technology and tutorials to stimulate ideas. Some issues feature a section of solicited papers on a particular subject of current interest. Recent special sections focused on seismic anisotropy, subsalt exploration and development, and microseismic monitoring.
The PDF format of each Geophysics paper is the official version of record.