{"title":"Fake news simulated performance: gazing and performing to reinforce negative destination stereotypes","authors":"Abbie-Gayle Johnson","doi":"10.1080/14616688.2023.2280172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractDestinations with populations of African descent have continuously experienced negative stereotypes portrayed in traditional Western print media. These narratives have expanded to fake news circulating among individuals online, which calls for new techniques in combatting this issue. As there is limited evidence related to fake news in destinations, this research examines how fake news has emerged as a means of reinforcing negative stereotypes for destinations by examining three cases. It proposes a geographical perspective for understanding the production of fake news in tourism as simulated performances incorporating the setting of the frontstage, gazers and changing identities. These aspects drive the visibility, legitimacy and resistance to fake news, which can affect economic gains and conflicting discourses regarding these destinations. This research moves away from conceptualising fake news as solely narratives, as has been done previously. As a result, it draws attention to the spatiality of the phenomenon, which can provide practitioners with insights for developing and implementing destination image repair strategies. Practitioners should incorporate gazers into their strategies for combatting stereotypes. They also need to carry out continuous and real-time repair alongside bunking strategies prior to and during performances. Debunking strategies should provide contextual data in order to be effective. Alongside the empirical contributions, the research enhances the theoretical underpinning of fake news, social media and generally technologies in tourism through the application of concepts within media and black geographies research. These research areas remain understudied in tourism but can serve as pathways to guide further analyses on race in online contexts.Keywords: Black geographiesdestination imagefake newsgazemedia geographiesperformancesocial media Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAbbie-Gayle JohnsonAbbie-Gayle Johnson is an assistant professor at the School of Hotel and Tourism Management at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Her research interests include destination marketing, smart tourism and the sharing economy.","PeriodicalId":48115,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Geographies","volume":"123 41","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Geographies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2023.2280172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractDestinations with populations of African descent have continuously experienced negative stereotypes portrayed in traditional Western print media. These narratives have expanded to fake news circulating among individuals online, which calls for new techniques in combatting this issue. As there is limited evidence related to fake news in destinations, this research examines how fake news has emerged as a means of reinforcing negative stereotypes for destinations by examining three cases. It proposes a geographical perspective for understanding the production of fake news in tourism as simulated performances incorporating the setting of the frontstage, gazers and changing identities. These aspects drive the visibility, legitimacy and resistance to fake news, which can affect economic gains and conflicting discourses regarding these destinations. This research moves away from conceptualising fake news as solely narratives, as has been done previously. As a result, it draws attention to the spatiality of the phenomenon, which can provide practitioners with insights for developing and implementing destination image repair strategies. Practitioners should incorporate gazers into their strategies for combatting stereotypes. They also need to carry out continuous and real-time repair alongside bunking strategies prior to and during performances. Debunking strategies should provide contextual data in order to be effective. Alongside the empirical contributions, the research enhances the theoretical underpinning of fake news, social media and generally technologies in tourism through the application of concepts within media and black geographies research. These research areas remain understudied in tourism but can serve as pathways to guide further analyses on race in online contexts.Keywords: Black geographiesdestination imagefake newsgazemedia geographiesperformancesocial media Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsAbbie-Gayle JohnsonAbbie-Gayle Johnson is an assistant professor at the School of Hotel and Tourism Management at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Her research interests include destination marketing, smart tourism and the sharing economy.
期刊介绍:
Tourism Geographies is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on exploring tourism and its related areas of recreation and leisure studies from a geographic perspective. It brings together academic and applied research as well as regional traditions from across the globe. The journal welcomes multidisciplinary approaches from fields such as geography, anthropology, landscape architecture, urban and regional planning, and environmental science and management. Tourism Geographies publishes various types of content including research articles, review articles, commentaries, literature reviews, and news related to affiliated organizations. All research articles and commentaries in the journal undergo a rigorous peer review process, including editor screening and double-anonymized evaluation conducted by two to three anonymous referees.