An Analysis of Learning Styles on Renewable Energy Material in Independent Curriculum for Differentiation Learning

Rolipa Rolipa, Ketang Wiyono, Sudirman Sudirman, Apit Fathurohman, Leni Marliana
{"title":"An Analysis of Learning Styles on Renewable Energy Material in Independent Curriculum for Differentiation Learning","authors":"Rolipa Rolipa, Ketang Wiyono, Sudirman Sudirman, Apit Fathurohman, Leni Marliana","doi":"10.20527/jipf.v7i2.9250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of student learning styles on renewable energy material in the independent curriculum for differentiation. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The method used was a learning style survey in the form of a questionnaire developed by Chislett and Chapman, which was conducted on 30 students in class X.4 of SMA Negeri 3 Banyuasin III. The results of the learning style survey were then analyzed and grouped by researchers according to the characteristics of learning styles, namely 50% visual learning style, 30% audio learning style, and 20% kinesthetic learning style. These results indicate that the tendency of students' learning styles varies in one class. Furthermore, a pretest and posttest assessment of renewable energy material was held for students. As for the results of the analysis of pretest, posttest, and gain learning outcomes, the average obtained by visual students was 19.3, audio 22.6, and kinesthetic 23.3 for posttest visual learning styles (77.0, audio 78.3, and kinesthetic 81.0), and visual gain was 57.7, audio 55.7, and kinesthetic 57.6. N-gain was analyzed to see the increase in learning outcomes, which obtained results for an average visual learning style of 0.71, audio 0.72, and kinesthetic 0.75. From this analysis, it can be concluded that differentiated learning with the learning style of renewable energy material can increase the number of students learning in the high category.","PeriodicalId":31460,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika AlBiruni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v7i2.9250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of student learning styles on renewable energy material in the independent curriculum for differentiation. This research is a qualitative descriptive study. The method used was a learning style survey in the form of a questionnaire developed by Chislett and Chapman, which was conducted on 30 students in class X.4 of SMA Negeri 3 Banyuasin III. The results of the learning style survey were then analyzed and grouped by researchers according to the characteristics of learning styles, namely 50% visual learning style, 30% audio learning style, and 20% kinesthetic learning style. These results indicate that the tendency of students' learning styles varies in one class. Furthermore, a pretest and posttest assessment of renewable energy material was held for students. As for the results of the analysis of pretest, posttest, and gain learning outcomes, the average obtained by visual students was 19.3, audio 22.6, and kinesthetic 23.3 for posttest visual learning styles (77.0, audio 78.3, and kinesthetic 81.0), and visual gain was 57.7, audio 55.7, and kinesthetic 57.6. N-gain was analyzed to see the increase in learning outcomes, which obtained results for an average visual learning style of 0.71, audio 0.72, and kinesthetic 0.75. From this analysis, it can be concluded that differentiated learning with the learning style of renewable energy material can increase the number of students learning in the high category.
差异化学习自主课程中可再生能源材料学习风格分析
本研究旨在分析学生学习风格在独立课程中对可再生能源材料的差异性的有效性。本研究为定性描述性研究。使用的方法是Chislett和Chapman开发的以问卷形式进行的学习风格调查,对SMA Negeri 3 Banyuasin III X.4班的30名学生进行了调查。研究人员根据学习风格的特点,即50%的视觉学习风格、30%的音频学习风格和20%的动觉学习风格,对学习风格调查的结果进行分析和分组。这些结果表明,学生的学习风格倾向在一个班级中是不同的。此外,对学生进行了可再生能源材料的前测和后测评估。前测、后测、增益学习结果分析结果显示,视觉学生的后测视觉学习风格(77.0,音频78.3,动觉81.0)平均得分为19.3,音频22.6,动觉23.3,视觉增益为57.7,音频55.7,动觉57.6。通过分析n增益来观察学习结果的增加,视觉学习风格的平均得分为0.71,音频学习风格的平均得分为0.72,动觉学习风格的平均得分为0.75。通过分析可以得出,采用可再生能源材料的学习方式进行差异化学习可以增加高类别学生的学习人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信