Microbial Load of Hand Sanitizer Dispensers—A University Hospital Study

Christos Stefanis, Elpida Giorgi, Elisavet Stavropoulou, Chrysoula (Chrysa) Voidarou, Maria Skoufou, Aikaterini Nelli, Athina Tzora, Christina Tsigalou, Eugenia Bezirtzoglou
{"title":"Microbial Load of Hand Sanitizer Dispensers—A University Hospital Study","authors":"Christos Stefanis, Elpida Giorgi, Elisavet Stavropoulou, Chrysoula (Chrysa) Voidarou, Maria Skoufou, Aikaterini Nelli, Athina Tzora, Christina Tsigalou, Eugenia Bezirtzoglou","doi":"10.3390/hygiene3040034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hospital-acquired infections are a significant concern in healthcare settings, leading to patient safety risks, increased morbidity and mortality, and financial burdens. Hand hygiene is crucial in preventing the spread of bacteria in hospitals and communities. Manual hand sanitizer dispensers can harbor presumptive pathogenic bacteria and act as fomites for bacterial transmission. This study aimed to assess the microbial contamination of manual hand sanitizer dispensers in a hospital setting and to study their antibiotic resistance profiles. Samples were collected using sterile cotton swabs and then inoculated into brain heart infusion broth. Subsequent subcultures were performed on both blood and MacConkey agar. The isolates were then identified using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) to the species level. Sampling was conducted in various wards and in the hospital and the University areas on dispenser levers and nozzle areas. The results showed that all samples yielded one or more bacterial species. Bacterial isolates identified belonged to species commonly found on the skin microflora and some Gram-negative enteric bacilli. Higher colonization was observed on the dispenser lever. Among Gram+ microorganisms, most bacterial species were shown to be sensitive to β-lactams, with the exception of Staphylococcus spp., resistant to AMP (Ampicillin) and Penicillin. However, no Methicillin resistant isolates were detected. Gram− microorganisms such as Pseudomonas luteola were shown to be sensitive to all tested antibiotics, while Pantoea agglomerans was shown to be resistant to AMC (amoxicillin–clavulanic acid). Rifampicin tested only against Bacilli showed resistance. Based on the findings, it is recommended to implement systematic cleaning and proper maintenance of manual dispenser areas or to use automated dispensers to reduce hand contact and minimize microbial contamination. Monitoring the presence of microorganisms in hand sanitizing gels and dispensers is an essential infection control strategy.","PeriodicalId":92037,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"60 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene3040034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospital-acquired infections are a significant concern in healthcare settings, leading to patient safety risks, increased morbidity and mortality, and financial burdens. Hand hygiene is crucial in preventing the spread of bacteria in hospitals and communities. Manual hand sanitizer dispensers can harbor presumptive pathogenic bacteria and act as fomites for bacterial transmission. This study aimed to assess the microbial contamination of manual hand sanitizer dispensers in a hospital setting and to study their antibiotic resistance profiles. Samples were collected using sterile cotton swabs and then inoculated into brain heart infusion broth. Subsequent subcultures were performed on both blood and MacConkey agar. The isolates were then identified using the Bruker MALDI Biotyper (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany) to the species level. Sampling was conducted in various wards and in the hospital and the University areas on dispenser levers and nozzle areas. The results showed that all samples yielded one or more bacterial species. Bacterial isolates identified belonged to species commonly found on the skin microflora and some Gram-negative enteric bacilli. Higher colonization was observed on the dispenser lever. Among Gram+ microorganisms, most bacterial species were shown to be sensitive to β-lactams, with the exception of Staphylococcus spp., resistant to AMP (Ampicillin) and Penicillin. However, no Methicillin resistant isolates were detected. Gram− microorganisms such as Pseudomonas luteola were shown to be sensitive to all tested antibiotics, while Pantoea agglomerans was shown to be resistant to AMC (amoxicillin–clavulanic acid). Rifampicin tested only against Bacilli showed resistance. Based on the findings, it is recommended to implement systematic cleaning and proper maintenance of manual dispenser areas or to use automated dispensers to reduce hand contact and minimize microbial contamination. Monitoring the presence of microorganisms in hand sanitizing gels and dispensers is an essential infection control strategy.
洗手液分配器的微生物负荷——一项大学医院研究
医院获得性感染是医疗保健环境中的一个重大问题,导致患者安全风险、发病率和死亡率增加以及经济负担。手部卫生对于防止细菌在医院和社区传播至关重要。手动洗手液分配器可能藏有假定的致病菌,并作为细菌传播的污染物。本研究旨在评估医院手动洗手液分配器的微生物污染,并研究其抗生素耐药性概况。用无菌棉签采集标本,接种于脑心灌注液中。随后在血液和麦康基琼脂上进行传代培养。然后使用Bruker MALDI生物类型器(Bruker Daltonik,不来梅,德国)对分离株进行物种水平的鉴定。在各个病房、医院和大学地区对分配器杠杆和喷嘴区域进行了抽样。结果表明,所有样品都产生了一种或多种细菌。分离出的细菌属于皮肤微生物群中常见的种类和一些革兰氏阴性肠杆菌。在分配器杠杆上观察到较高的定植。在革兰氏+微生物中,除葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus spp.)对氨苄西林(AMP)和青霉素耐药外,大多数细菌对β-内酰胺敏感。但未检出耐甲氧西林菌株。革兰氏微生物,如黄苔假单胞菌,对所有测试的抗生素都敏感,而Pantoea agglomerans对AMC(阿莫西林-克拉维酸)具有耐药性。利福平仅对芽孢杆菌耐药。根据研究结果,建议对手动分配器区域进行系统的清洁和适当的维护,或使用自动分配器以减少手接触并最大限度地减少微生物污染。监测洗手液和洗手液中微生物的存在是一项重要的感染控制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信