Evaluation of patients with low back pain due to facet joint arthrosis: The relationship between pain beliefs and pain, function, and quality of life

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
Begum Okudan, Derya Çelik, Orkun Koban
{"title":"Evaluation of patients with low back pain due to facet joint arthrosis: The relationship between pain beliefs and pain, function, and quality of life","authors":"Begum Okudan, Derya Çelik, Orkun Koban","doi":"10.3233/ppr-220694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the clinical and functional status of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) due to facet joint arthrosis (FJA) and to examine the relationship, if any, between pain beliefs and clinical and functional status. METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study involved patients who had been diagnosed with CLBP due to mild to moderate FJA. The participants were evaluated using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS rest and activity), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Short-Form Quality of Life Index 12 version 2 (SF-12v2; PCS and MCS) and the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: This study involved 58 patients (28 females and 30 males) with a mean age of 52.12±4.64 years. The reported pain intensity was 1.93±1.52 at rest and 5.10±1.10 during activity, while the ODI was 24.59±6.61. The MCS was higher than the PCS, with mean scores of 43.52±5.86 and 38.97±5.01, respectively. The participants had higher scores for organic pain beliefs (3.81±0.51) than for psychological pain beliefs (3.35±0.69). A weak positive correlation was found between psychological pain beliefs and functional status (r = 0.336; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLBP due to FJA experienced mild pain at rest, moderate pain during activity, and moderate functional disability. Participants with stronger psychological pain beliefs exhibited a higher level of functional disability. Addressing pain beliefs may help to improve functional outcomes.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the clinical and functional status of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) due to facet joint arthrosis (FJA) and to examine the relationship, if any, between pain beliefs and clinical and functional status. METHODS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study involved patients who had been diagnosed with CLBP due to mild to moderate FJA. The participants were evaluated using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS rest and activity), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Short-Form Quality of Life Index 12 version 2 (SF-12v2; PCS and MCS) and the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: This study involved 58 patients (28 females and 30 males) with a mean age of 52.12±4.64 years. The reported pain intensity was 1.93±1.52 at rest and 5.10±1.10 during activity, while the ODI was 24.59±6.61. The MCS was higher than the PCS, with mean scores of 43.52±5.86 and 38.97±5.01, respectively. The participants had higher scores for organic pain beliefs (3.81±0.51) than for psychological pain beliefs (3.35±0.69). A weak positive correlation was found between psychological pain beliefs and functional status (r = 0.336; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CLBP due to FJA experienced mild pain at rest, moderate pain during activity, and moderate functional disability. Participants with stronger psychological pain beliefs exhibited a higher level of functional disability. Addressing pain beliefs may help to improve functional outcomes.
小关节关节病所致腰痛患者的评估:疼痛信念与疼痛、功能和生活质量的关系
目的:本研究旨在确定小关节(facet joint arthrosis, FJA)所致慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者的临床和功能状态,并探讨疼痛信念与临床和功能状态之间的关系。方法:这项描述性横断面研究纳入了因轻度至中度FJA而被诊断为CLBP的患者。采用数字疼痛评定量表(NPRS休息和活动)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、短表生活质量指数12版本2 (SF-12v2;疼痛信念问卷(PBQ)。采用SPSS进行统计分析。结果:共纳入58例患者,其中女性28例,男性30例,平均年龄52.12±4.64岁。休息时疼痛强度为1.93±1.52,活动时疼痛强度为5.10±1.10,ODI为24.59±6.61。MCS评分高于PCS,分别为43.52±5.86分和38.97±5.01分。被试的有机疼痛信念得分(3.81±0.51)高于心理疼痛信念得分(3.35±0.69)。心理疼痛信念与功能状态呈弱正相关(r = 0.336;P = 0.010)。结论:FJA导致的CLBP患者在休息时出现轻度疼痛,活动时出现中度疼痛,并伴有中度功能障碍。心理疼痛信念较强的参与者表现出更高程度的功能残疾。解决疼痛信念可能有助于改善功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信