Implementation of the Composite Performance Index and Rank Order Centroid Weighting Methods in E-Wallet Selection

Susana Dwi Yulianti, Rini Nuraini, Arisantoso Arisantoso, Mursalim Tonggiroh
{"title":"Implementation of the Composite Performance Index and Rank Order Centroid Weighting Methods in E-Wallet Selection","authors":"Susana Dwi Yulianti, Rini Nuraini, Arisantoso Arisantoso, Mursalim Tonggiroh","doi":"10.38101/sisfotek.v13i2.9720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, e-wallets have become a popular alternative for non-cash financial transactions. More and more e-wallet companies and service providers are emerging with various features and benefits. To determine the choice of using an e-wallet, users must know each e-wallet's various features and services; of course, this takes time and makes it difficult for decision-makers. This research aims to implement the Composite Performance Index (CPI) and Rank Order Centroid (ROC) approaches in a decision support system for choosing an e-wallet to produce easy and fast decisions. The ROC method is used to determine the weight value based on the order of importance of the criteria. Meanwhile, the CPI approach has the ability to combine information from various criteria into one index and evaluate differences in criteria to obtain alternative rankings. This research produces a website-based DSS application that recommends the best alternative by displaying alternative rankings. The system built produces valid calculation output; this is proven by the results of calculations by the system and manual calculations showing the same results. For software testing with usability testing, an average value of 86% was obtained. This means that the software developed is feasible to implement and considered easy to use.","PeriodicalId":378682,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL SISFOTEK GLOBAL","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL SISFOTEK GLOBAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38101/sisfotek.v13i2.9720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, e-wallets have become a popular alternative for non-cash financial transactions. More and more e-wallet companies and service providers are emerging with various features and benefits. To determine the choice of using an e-wallet, users must know each e-wallet's various features and services; of course, this takes time and makes it difficult for decision-makers. This research aims to implement the Composite Performance Index (CPI) and Rank Order Centroid (ROC) approaches in a decision support system for choosing an e-wallet to produce easy and fast decisions. The ROC method is used to determine the weight value based on the order of importance of the criteria. Meanwhile, the CPI approach has the ability to combine information from various criteria into one index and evaluate differences in criteria to obtain alternative rankings. This research produces a website-based DSS application that recommends the best alternative by displaying alternative rankings. The system built produces valid calculation output; this is proven by the results of calculations by the system and manual calculations showing the same results. For software testing with usability testing, an average value of 86% was obtained. This means that the software developed is feasible to implement and considered easy to use.
综合性能指标法和阶序质心加权法在电子钱包选择中的实现
如今,电子钱包已经成为非现金金融交易的一种流行选择。越来越多的电子钱包公司和服务提供商出现,具有各种功能和优势。在决定使用电子钱包时,用户必须了解每个电子钱包的各种功能和服务;当然,这需要时间,也给决策者带来了困难。本研究旨在将综合绩效指数(CPI)和秩序质心(ROC)方法应用于电子钱包选择决策支持系统中,以产生简单快速的决策。使用ROC方法根据标准的重要性顺序确定权重值。同时,CPI方法能够将来自不同标准的信息组合成一个指数,并评估标准之间的差异,从而获得可选的排名。这项研究产生了一个基于网站的DSS应用程序,通过显示备选排名来推荐最佳备选方案。所建系统产生有效的计算输出;系统计算结果与人工计算结果一致,证明了这一点。对于带有可用性测试的软件测试,得到的平均值为86%。这意味着所开发的软件实现起来是可行的,并且易于使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信