A Comparison of Curettage Only and Curettage with Electrocautery After Partial Matrixectomy for Ingrowing Toenail

Ali ŞİŞMAN, Rıdvan ÖNER, Özgür AVCİ, Serdar Kamil ÇEPNİ
{"title":"A Comparison of Curettage Only and Curettage with Electrocautery After Partial Matrixectomy for Ingrowing Toenail","authors":"Ali ŞİŞMAN, Rıdvan ÖNER, Özgür AVCİ, Serdar Kamil ÇEPNİ","doi":"10.16899/jcm.1324094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Ingrowing toenail is a very common disease which causes workforce losses. Although different techniques have been described in surgical treatment, one of the most frequently preferred methods is partial matrixectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the two techniques of curettage only and curettage together with electrocautery(C&E) used in addition to partial matrixectomy in ingrowing toenail surgery. 
 Methods: Patients who were operated for ingrown nails between 2018 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Two groups were formed of 43 patients applied with curettage only and 35 patients applied with C&E. The groups were compared in respect of operating time, postoperative complications and clinical results. 
 Results: No significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of age, gender, affected side, classification, follow-up time, surgical duration and recovery time. Recurrence rate was higher in the curettage group (p=0.020) It occurred in 9 (20.9%) cases in the curettage group, while it occurred in 1 (2.9%) case in the C&E group. In the curettage group, the duration of erythema was observed to be significantly longer (p","PeriodicalId":15449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1324094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Ingrowing toenail is a very common disease which causes workforce losses. Although different techniques have been described in surgical treatment, one of the most frequently preferred methods is partial matrixectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the two techniques of curettage only and curettage together with electrocautery(C&E) used in addition to partial matrixectomy in ingrowing toenail surgery. Methods: Patients who were operated for ingrown nails between 2018 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Two groups were formed of 43 patients applied with curettage only and 35 patients applied with C&E. The groups were compared in respect of operating time, postoperative complications and clinical results. Results: No significant difference was determined between the groups in respect of age, gender, affected side, classification, follow-up time, surgical duration and recovery time. Recurrence rate was higher in the curettage group (p=0.020) It occurred in 9 (20.9%) cases in the curettage group, while it occurred in 1 (2.9%) case in the C&E group. In the curettage group, the duration of erythema was observed to be significantly longer (p
生长趾甲部分基质切除后单纯刮除与电灼刮除的比较
目的:长脚趾甲是一种非常常见的导致劳动力流失的疾病。尽管在手术治疗中描述了不同的技术,但最常用的首选方法之一是部分基质切除术。本研究的目的是比较单纯刮除和电灼刮除部分基质切除术外在生长趾甲手术中的两种技术。& # x0D;方法:回顾性分析2018 ~ 2022年手术治疗的甲内生长患者。两组分别为单纯刮痧组43例和C&E组35例。比较两组手术时间、术后并发症及临床效果。& # x0D;结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、患侧、分型、随访时间、手术时间、恢复时间等方面无明显差异。刮痧组复发率较高(p=0.020),刮痧组9例(20.9%),C&E组1例(2.9%)。刮痧组红斑持续时间明显延长(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信