Çocuk Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Trakeostomi Uygulamaları, Tek Merkez Deneyimi

Merve HAVAN, Ali TUNÇ, Murat ERSOY, Mahmut ASLAN, Arman APİ
{"title":"Çocuk Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde Trakeostomi Uygulamaları, Tek Merkez Deneyimi","authors":"Merve HAVAN, Ali TUNÇ, Murat ERSOY, Mahmut ASLAN, Arman APİ","doi":"10.16899/jcm.1355300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims: Tracheostomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). While it used to be an emergency treatment method in patients with laryngeal obstruction, it is now mostly used in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation under elective conditions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patients who underwent tracheostomy in our PICU, indications, and complications.
 Methods: This retrospective study was conducted from February 2018 through April 2022. Data was collected from the patient’s records and analyzed.
 Results: Forty-three patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 5±4.99 (0-17 years) and 30 patients (69.8%) were male. During the four-year study period, the tracheostomy rate was 2.4% and the decannulation rate was 7%. All of the patients were discharged home with the home ventilator. The most common indication for tracheostomy was prolonged mechanical ventilation (88.3%). The median time of mechanical ventilation before tracheostomy was 111.6±57.22 (range 0-240) days. No surgical complications were observed during the PICU follow-up. All patients were discharged from PICU with a home-type mechanical ventilator. The median number of outpatient controls after discharge was 7.28±1.89 (range 3-10), and the median number of annual cannula replacements was 3.62±0.76 (range 1-5). 14 patients died after discharge from the PICU. None of the patients died due to tracheostomy complications. The median time of death was 30±13.97 (range 11-56) days after discharge from the PICU. When the surviving and deceased patients were compared according to age, mechanical ventilation time, and length of stay in the PICU, no significant difference was found (p=0.291, p=0.115, and p=0.291, respectively).
 Conclusions: In our study, long mechanical ventilation time was the most common indication for tracheostomy, and our result is consistent with the literature. Although the timing of tracheostomy was long, no significant correlation was observed with mortality.","PeriodicalId":15449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1355300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aims: Tracheostomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). While it used to be an emergency treatment method in patients with laryngeal obstruction, it is now mostly used in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation under elective conditions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate patients who underwent tracheostomy in our PICU, indications, and complications. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted from February 2018 through April 2022. Data was collected from the patient’s records and analyzed. Results: Forty-three patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 5±4.99 (0-17 years) and 30 patients (69.8%) were male. During the four-year study period, the tracheostomy rate was 2.4% and the decannulation rate was 7%. All of the patients were discharged home with the home ventilator. The most common indication for tracheostomy was prolonged mechanical ventilation (88.3%). The median time of mechanical ventilation before tracheostomy was 111.6±57.22 (range 0-240) days. No surgical complications were observed during the PICU follow-up. All patients were discharged from PICU with a home-type mechanical ventilator. The median number of outpatient controls after discharge was 7.28±1.89 (range 3-10), and the median number of annual cannula replacements was 3.62±0.76 (range 1-5). 14 patients died after discharge from the PICU. None of the patients died due to tracheostomy complications. The median time of death was 30±13.97 (range 11-56) days after discharge from the PICU. When the surviving and deceased patients were compared according to age, mechanical ventilation time, and length of stay in the PICU, no significant difference was found (p=0.291, p=0.115, and p=0.291, respectively). Conclusions: In our study, long mechanical ventilation time was the most common indication for tracheostomy, and our result is consistent with the literature. Although the timing of tracheostomy was long, no significant correlation was observed with mortality.
儿科重症监护室的气管切开术实践,单中心经验
背景/目的:气管切开术是儿科重症监护病房(PICU)最常用的外科手术之一。虽然它曾经是喉梗阻患者的一种紧急治疗方法,但现在主要用于选择性条件下延长机械通气的患者。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估在PICU接受气管切开术的患者,适应症和并发症。方法:回顾性研究于2018年2月至2022年4月进行。从患者记录中收集数据并进行分析。 结果:43例患者纳入研究。患者中位年龄为5±4.99岁(0 ~ 17岁),男性30例(69.8%)。在四年的研究期间,气管切开术率为2.4%,脱管率为7%。所有患者出院时均使用家用呼吸机。气管切开术最常见的指征是延长机械通气(88.3%)。气管切开术前机械通气的中位时间为111.6±57.22(0 ~ 240)天。PICU随访期间未见手术并发症。所有患者均使用家用机械呼吸机从PICU出院。出院后门诊对照的中位数为7.28±1.89(范围3-10),每年更换套管的中位数为3.62±0.76(范围1-5)。出院后死亡14例。无一例患者死于气管切开术并发症。出院后中位死亡时间为30±13.97(范围11-56)天。幸存与死亡患者年龄、机械通气时间、PICU住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(p=0.291、p=0.115、p=0.291)。 结论:在我们的研究中,机械通气时间过长是气管切开术最常见的指征,我们的结果与文献一致。虽然气管切开术时间较长,但与死亡率无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信