Environmental information disclosure: a cross-country analysis from European Union public companies

Małgorzata Janicka, Artur Sajnóg
{"title":"Environmental information disclosure: a cross-country analysis from European Union public companies","authors":"Małgorzata Janicka, Artur Sajnóg","doi":"10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.3.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the contemporary challenges related to climate change and effectively managing raw materials is to reduce resource consumption and the negative environmental impact while simultaneously increasing the economy’s competitiveness. This requires that business entities change priorities and move to a sustainable relationship focused on ecological, economic and social well-being. Due to the transnational and global nature of the climate and the environment, actions in this area should be carried out at a supranational level. In European Union (EU) countries, successive directives are implemented regarding environmental changes and the taxonomy for non-financial reporting. This forces public companies, as large public interest units, to produce adequate quality data reporting in the ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) area, including the environmental (E) indicator and its components. The article’s purpose is to make a comparative assessment of the current situation and to consider the prospects for environmental data disclosure by public companies listed on the regulated markets of the EU, with particular emphasis on energy consumption, water, waste production, and CO2 emissions. The Refinitiv database was used to test the quality of the environmental indicators. Public companies listed on the leading stock markets in the 27 EU Member States were included. The research period covers 2012–2021. We focus on checking how many companies report environmental data in any given year, and those that present them for at least one year, or for three, five, or ten years. The findings support the clear advantage of the quality of environmental data disclosure in the ‘old’ EU Member States (which joined before 2004) compared to the ‘new’ EU Member States. However, reporting on key environmental issues (water and energy consumption, waste production, and carbon dioxide) is very incomplete.","PeriodicalId":34827,"journal":{"name":"Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2023.85.3.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the contemporary challenges related to climate change and effectively managing raw materials is to reduce resource consumption and the negative environmental impact while simultaneously increasing the economy’s competitiveness. This requires that business entities change priorities and move to a sustainable relationship focused on ecological, economic and social well-being. Due to the transnational and global nature of the climate and the environment, actions in this area should be carried out at a supranational level. In European Union (EU) countries, successive directives are implemented regarding environmental changes and the taxonomy for non-financial reporting. This forces public companies, as large public interest units, to produce adequate quality data reporting in the ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) area, including the environmental (E) indicator and its components. The article’s purpose is to make a comparative assessment of the current situation and to consider the prospects for environmental data disclosure by public companies listed on the regulated markets of the EU, with particular emphasis on energy consumption, water, waste production, and CO2 emissions. The Refinitiv database was used to test the quality of the environmental indicators. Public companies listed on the leading stock markets in the 27 EU Member States were included. The research period covers 2012–2021. We focus on checking how many companies report environmental data in any given year, and those that present them for at least one year, or for three, five, or ten years. The findings support the clear advantage of the quality of environmental data disclosure in the ‘old’ EU Member States (which joined before 2004) compared to the ‘new’ EU Member States. However, reporting on key environmental issues (water and energy consumption, waste production, and carbon dioxide) is very incomplete.
环境信息披露:来自欧盟上市公司的跨国分析
与气候变化和有效管理原材料相关的当代挑战之一是减少资源消耗和对环境的负面影响,同时提高经济的竞争力。这要求企业实体改变优先事项,转向注重生态、经济和社会福祉的可持续关系。由于气候和环境的跨国和全球性,这方面的行动应在超国家一级进行。在欧洲联盟(EU)国家,关于环境变化和非财务报告分类法的连续指令得到实施。这迫使上市公司作为大型公共利益单位,在ESG(环境、社会和治理)领域提供足够的高质量数据报告,包括环境(E)指标及其组成部分。本文的目的是对现状进行比较评估,并考虑在欧盟监管市场上市的上市公司环境数据披露的前景,特别强调能源消耗,水,废物生产和二氧化碳排放。采用Refinitiv数据库检验环境指标的质量。在欧盟27个成员国的主要股票市场上市的上市公司也包括在内。研究时间为2012-2021年。我们关注的是每年有多少公司报告环境数据,以及那些至少一年、三年、五年或十年报告环境数据的公司。研究结果支持了“老”欧盟成员国(2004年之前加入欧盟)与“新”欧盟成员国相比,环境数据披露质量的明显优势。然而,对关键环境问题(水和能源消耗、废物产生和二氧化碳)的报道非常不完整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信