{"title":"Evaluation of caregiver burdens of caregivers to individuals with chronic heart failure","authors":"Yasemin DOĞAN, Hümeyra ASLANER","doi":"10.16899/jcm.1345944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In this study we aimed to determine the burden of caregiving and the factors affecting the burden of caregiving among caregivers of patients with chronic heart failure (HF).
 Methods: In this prospective study, the Zarit Care Burden Scale (ZCBS) was applied face-to-face to caregivers of 178 heart failure patients. On the scale scoring, 0-20 points indicate \"no care burden\", 21-40 points indicate \"light care burden\", 41-60 points indicate \"moderate care burden\" and 61-88 points indicate \"heavy care burden\".
 Results: The burden of caregivers over 65 years of age with HF was higher (p","PeriodicalId":15449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contemporary medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contemporary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1345944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: In this study we aimed to determine the burden of caregiving and the factors affecting the burden of caregiving among caregivers of patients with chronic heart failure (HF).
Methods: In this prospective study, the Zarit Care Burden Scale (ZCBS) was applied face-to-face to caregivers of 178 heart failure patients. On the scale scoring, 0-20 points indicate "no care burden", 21-40 points indicate "light care burden", 41-60 points indicate "moderate care burden" and 61-88 points indicate "heavy care burden".
Results: The burden of caregivers over 65 years of age with HF was higher (p