Assessing Frequency and Appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Deprescription in Patients Requiring Endoscopic Therapy for Esophageal Strictures

Kevin L Kecskemeti, Mark Borgaonkar, Jerry McGrath
{"title":"Assessing Frequency and Appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitor Deprescription in Patients Requiring Endoscopic Therapy for Esophageal Strictures","authors":"Kevin L Kecskemeti, Mark Borgaonkar, Jerry McGrath","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective There have been concerns about the widespread usage of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), leading to recommendations to deprescribe PPIs in certain patients. This study aims to determine if PPI deprescription in patients with symptomatic esophageal strictures was consistent with published guidelines and to compare the rate of PPI deprescription between two-time points. Methods All patients from two gastroenterology practices who received endoscopic dilation to treat symptomatic strictures between the years of 2015–2017 and 2019–2021 were identified using physician billing codes. We defined inappropriate PPI deprescription as: a patient who was deprescribed their PPI with a past medical history of esophageal stricture, Barrett’s esophagus, grade C/D esophagitis, or who had experienced symptom recurrence after PPI deprescription. Furthermore, we analyzed the rate of PPI deprescription between two time periods 2015–2017 (group 1) and 2019–2021 (group 2). Results Two hundred twenty-three esophageal dilations were analyzed. Twenty-six patients in the sample were deprescribed their PPI, with the majority (57 percent) meeting the criteria for inappropriate PPI deprescription. There was a trend towards more inappropriate deprescription in the second time period. (71 percent vs. 33 percent; P = 0.06). Patients in group 2 had a higher rate of PPI deprescription (23.9 percent) than group 1 (6.0 percent; P < 0.001). Conclusions PPI deprescription in patients treated for symptomatic esophageal strictures appears to be more common in the second time period. Most patients were defined as inappropriate deprescription. Physicians must apply guidelines carefully when considering deprescribing PPIs.","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective There have been concerns about the widespread usage of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), leading to recommendations to deprescribe PPIs in certain patients. This study aims to determine if PPI deprescription in patients with symptomatic esophageal strictures was consistent with published guidelines and to compare the rate of PPI deprescription between two-time points. Methods All patients from two gastroenterology practices who received endoscopic dilation to treat symptomatic strictures between the years of 2015–2017 and 2019–2021 were identified using physician billing codes. We defined inappropriate PPI deprescription as: a patient who was deprescribed their PPI with a past medical history of esophageal stricture, Barrett’s esophagus, grade C/D esophagitis, or who had experienced symptom recurrence after PPI deprescription. Furthermore, we analyzed the rate of PPI deprescription between two time periods 2015–2017 (group 1) and 2019–2021 (group 2). Results Two hundred twenty-three esophageal dilations were analyzed. Twenty-six patients in the sample were deprescribed their PPI, with the majority (57 percent) meeting the criteria for inappropriate PPI deprescription. There was a trend towards more inappropriate deprescription in the second time period. (71 percent vs. 33 percent; P = 0.06). Patients in group 2 had a higher rate of PPI deprescription (23.9 percent) than group 1 (6.0 percent; P < 0.001). Conclusions PPI deprescription in patients treated for symptomatic esophageal strictures appears to be more common in the second time period. Most patients were defined as inappropriate deprescription. Physicians must apply guidelines carefully when considering deprescribing PPIs.
评估内镜治疗食管狭窄患者质子泵抑制剂停用的频率和适当性
【摘要】目的质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)的广泛使用引起了人们的关注,因此建议在某些患者中停用PPIs。本研究旨在确定症状性食管狭窄患者的PPI停用是否与已发表的指南一致,并比较两个时间点之间PPI停用的比率。方法对2015-2017年至2019-2021年期间接受内镜扩张治疗症状性狭窄的两家胃肠病学诊所的所有患者使用医师账单代码进行识别。我们将不适当的PPI停药定义为:在开PPI时有食管狭窄、Barrett食管、C/D级食管炎病史的患者,或在停药后出现症状复发的患者。此外,我们分析了2015-2017年(第一组)和2019-2021年(第二组)两个时间段PPI去处方率。结果分析了223例食管扩张。样本中的26例患者停用了他们的PPI,其中大多数(57%)符合不适当的PPI停用标准。在第二个时期,有一种更不适当的去处方的趋势。(71%对33%;P = 0.06)。2组患者PPI去处方率(23.9%)高于1组(6.0%;P, lt;0.001)。结论在有症状的食管狭窄患者中,第二阶段PPI停用更为常见。大多数患者被定义为不适当的去处方。医生在考虑开PPIs处方时必须仔细应用指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信