The Ongoing Necessity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for cT1–2N0 Breast Cancer Patients

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Care Pub Date : 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1159/000532081
Wenjun Jia, Xiao Chen, Xinyu Wang, Jianzhong Zhang, Tong Tang, Jianing Shi
{"title":"The Ongoing Necessity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for cT1–2N0 Breast Cancer Patients","authors":"Wenjun Jia, Xiao Chen, Xinyu Wang, Jianzhong Zhang, Tong Tang, Jianing Shi","doi":"10.1159/000532081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b><i>Background:</i></b> Recent clinical trials attempt to determine whether it is appropriate to omit axillary lymph node surgery in patients with cT1–2N0 breast cancer. The study aimed to investigate the true extent of axillary node disease in patients with clinically negative nodes and explore the differences between negative axillary ultrasound (AUS-cN0) and suspicious axillary ultrasound with negative fine-needle aspiration (FNA-cN0). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Pathologically identified T1–2 invasive breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes were retrospectively analyzed at our center between January 2019 and December 2022. Patients who received any systematic treatment before surgery were excluded from this study. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 538 patients were enrolled in this study. 134 (24.9%) patients had pathologically positive nodes, and 404 (75.1%) patients had negative nodes. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size, T stage, Ki67 level, and vascular invasion (VI) were strongly associated with pathological axillary lymph node positivity. In multivariate analysis, VI was the only independent risk factor for node positivity in patients with cT1–2N0 disease (OR: 3.723, confidence interval [CI]: 2.380–5.824, <i>p</i> &amp;lt; 0.001). Otherwise, pathological node positivity was not significantly different between AUS-cN0 and FNA-cN0 groups (23.4% vs. 28.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.193). However, the rate of high nodal burden (≥3 positive nodes) was significantly higher in FNA-cN0 group. Further investigation revealed that FNA-cN0 and VI were independently associated with a high nodal burden (OR: 2.650, CI: 1.081–6.496, <i>p</i> = 0.033; OR: 3.521, CI: 1.249–9.931, <i>p</i> = 0.017, respectively). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> cT1–2 breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes may have pathologically positive lymph nodes and even a high nodal burden. False negatives in AUS and AUS-guided FNA should not be ignored, and sentinel lymph node biopsy remains an ongoing necessity for cT1–2N0 breast cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000532081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent clinical trials attempt to determine whether it is appropriate to omit axillary lymph node surgery in patients with cT1–2N0 breast cancer. The study aimed to investigate the true extent of axillary node disease in patients with clinically negative nodes and explore the differences between negative axillary ultrasound (AUS-cN0) and suspicious axillary ultrasound with negative fine-needle aspiration (FNA-cN0). Methods: Pathologically identified T1–2 invasive breast cancer patients with clinically negative nodes were retrospectively analyzed at our center between January 2019 and December 2022. Patients who received any systematic treatment before surgery were excluded from this study. Results: A total of 538 patients were enrolled in this study. 134 (24.9%) patients had pathologically positive nodes, and 404 (75.1%) patients had negative nodes. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size, T stage, Ki67 level, and vascular invasion (VI) were strongly associated with pathological axillary lymph node positivity. In multivariate analysis, VI was the only independent risk factor for node positivity in patients with cT1–2N0 disease (OR: 3.723, confidence interval [CI]: 2.380–5.824, p &lt; 0.001). Otherwise, pathological node positivity was not significantly different between AUS-cN0 and FNA-cN0 groups (23.4% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.193). However, the rate of high nodal burden (≥3 positive nodes) was significantly higher in FNA-cN0 group. Further investigation revealed that FNA-cN0 and VI were independently associated with a high nodal burden (OR: 2.650, CI: 1.081–6.496, p = 0.033; OR: 3.521, CI: 1.249–9.931, p = 0.017, respectively). Conclusions: cT1–2 breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes may have pathologically positive lymph nodes and even a high nodal burden. False negatives in AUS and AUS-guided FNA should not be ignored, and sentinel lymph node biopsy remains an ongoing necessity for cT1–2N0 breast cancer patients.
cT1-2N0乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检的持续必要性
& lt; b> & lt; i>背景:& lt; / i> & lt; / b>最近的临床试验试图确定cT1-2N0乳腺癌患者是否适合省略腋窝淋巴结手术。本研究旨在探讨临床淋巴结阴性患者腋窝淋巴结病变的真实程度,探讨腋窝超声阴性(AUS-cN0)与可疑腋窝超声伴细针穿刺阴性(FNA-cN0)的差异。& lt; b> & lt; i>方法:& lt; / i> & lt; / b>回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年12月在我中心病理确诊的T1-2例临床阴性淋巴结浸润性乳腺癌患者。术前接受过系统治疗的患者被排除在本研究之外。& lt; b> & lt; i>结果:& lt; / i> & lt; / b>共有538名患者参加了这项研究。病理阳性134例(24.9%),病理阴性404例(75.1%)。单因素分析显示,肿瘤大小、T分期、Ki67水平和血管浸润(VI)与病理性腋窝淋巴结阳性密切相关。在多因素分析中,VI是cT1-2N0患者淋巴结阳性的唯一独立危险因素(OR: 3.723,置信区间[CI]: 2.380-5.824, <i>p</i>, lt;0.001)。此外,AUS-cN0组与FNA-cN0组病理淋巴结阳性差异无统计学意义(23.4% vs 28.8%, <i>p</i>= 0.193)。但FNA-cN0组高淋巴结负担率(≥3个阳性淋巴结)明显高于对照组。进一步研究发现FNA-cN0和VI与高淋巴结负担独立相关(OR: 2.650, CI: 1.081-6.496, <i>p</i>= 0.033;OR: 3.521, CI: 1.249-9.931, <i>p</i>= 0.017)。& lt; b> & lt; i>结论:& lt; / i> & lt; / b>临床阴性腋窝淋巴结的cT1-2乳腺癌患者可能有病理阳性淋巴结,甚至有高淋巴结负担。AUS和AUS引导下的FNA假阴性不应被忽视,对于cT1-2N0乳腺癌患者,前哨淋巴结活检仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信