Victor D. Gazman
{"title":"","authors":"Victor D. Gazman","doi":"10.47852/bonviewglce3202511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the results of the study, the purpose of which was to develop a new criterion for the Environment, Social, Governance (ESG) model and recommendations for its use in the ESG in determining the socioeconomic benefits of wind and solar energy instead of the most toxic generation—coal. The criterion proposed by the author for the ESG model has not been previously considered in the scientific literature. Based on the theoretical assumptions, the author’s methodology for determining the achieved savings is presented in the example of a number of large energy companies RWE, Enel, and Sunseap in Singapore. This article presents the model developed by the author and the calculations themselves and comments related to the proposed model. This article presents the author’s developed model and the calculations and comments themselves. The calculations carried out are based on the actual amount of carbon dioxide emissions charges, taking into account the damage caused, the number of people saved from premature death due to harmful CO2 emissions into the atmosphere, the value of statistical life determined by the WorldBank for Germany, Singapore, and Italy, the costs of treating concomitant diseases, and the social discount rate. This makes it possible to determine the real socioeconomic effect of replacing fossil energy sources with cleaner energy carriers that are not carbon-containing. An argument is presented that refutes the argument about the occurrence of a significant increase in costs in the economy that may arise due to the introduction of a fixed fee for harmful emissions. This allows you to set more accurate benchmarks and indicators in the ESG system and use them in attracting investors, forming ratings, and training specialists. The results of the research presented in this article may be useful for analysts who are engaged in the development and use of ratings for the ESG model, primarily for section E but also for section S. This article highlights the possibilities of accelerating invest","PeriodicalId":489841,"journal":{"name":"Green and Low-Carbon Economy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green and Low-Carbon Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewglce3202511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the results of the study, the purpose of which was to develop a new criterion for the Environment, Social, Governance (ESG) model and recommendations for its use in the ESG in determining the socioeconomic benefits of wind and solar energy instead of the most toxic generation—coal. The criterion proposed by the author for the ESG model has not been previously considered in the scientific literature. Based on the theoretical assumptions, the author’s methodology for determining the achieved savings is presented in the example of a number of large energy companies RWE, Enel, and Sunseap in Singapore. This article presents the model developed by the author and the calculations themselves and comments related to the proposed model. This article presents the author’s developed model and the calculations and comments themselves. The calculations carried out are based on the actual amount of carbon dioxide emissions charges, taking into account the damage caused, the number of people saved from premature death due to harmful CO2 emissions into the atmosphere, the value of statistical life determined by the WorldBank for Germany, Singapore, and Italy, the costs of treating concomitant diseases, and the social discount rate. This makes it possible to determine the real socioeconomic effect of replacing fossil energy sources with cleaner energy carriers that are not carbon-containing. An argument is presented that refutes the argument about the occurrence of a significant increase in costs in the economy that may arise due to the introduction of a fixed fee for harmful emissions. This allows you to set more accurate benchmarks and indicators in the ESG system and use them in attracting investors, forming ratings, and training specialists. The results of the research presented in this article may be useful for analysts who are engaged in the development and use of ratings for the ESG model, primarily for section E but also for section S. This article highlights the possibilities of accelerating invest
本文介绍了这项研究的结果,其目的是为环境、社会、治理(ESG)模型制定一个新的标准,并建议在ESG中使用该标准来确定风能和太阳能替代毒性最大的发电方式——煤炭的社会经济效益。作者为ESG模型提出的标准以前在科学文献中没有被考虑过。基于理论假设,作者以新加坡的RWE、Enel和Sunseap等大型能源公司为例,介绍了确定已实现节约的方法。本文介绍了作者开发的模型和计算本身,并对所提出的模型进行了评论。本文给出了作者开发的模型,并给出了计算结果和评论。所进行的计算是根据二氧化碳排放费的实际数额,考虑到造成的损害、因有害二氧化碳排放到大气中而免于过早死亡的人数、世界银行为德国、新加坡和意大利确定的统计寿命值、治疗伴随疾病的费用以及社会贴现率。这使得确定用不含碳的清洁能源替代化石能源的真正社会经济影响成为可能。本文提出了一个论点,反驳了由于对有害排放物征收固定费用而可能导致经济成本显著增加的论点。这使您可以在ESG系统中设置更准确的基准和指标,并将其用于吸引投资者、形成评级和培训专家。本文提出的研究结果可能对从事ESG模型评级开发和使用的分析师有用,主要用于E部分,但也用于s部分。本文强调了加速投资的可能性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信