[Solid-phase immunoenzyme analysis (ELISA)--a test for diagnosing Q fever (comparison with the complement fixation and immunofluorescence methods)].

Trudy Instituta imeni Pastera Pub Date : 1989-01-01
E Kovacóvá
{"title":"[Solid-phase immunoenzyme analysis (ELISA)--a test for diagnosing Q fever (comparison with the complement fixation and immunofluorescence methods)].","authors":"E Kovacóvá","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purified phase I Coxiella burnetii corpuscles treated chemically in different ways (by potassium periodate, mild acid hydrolysis or trichloroacetic acid) were compared by ELISA for their ability to detect phase II (directed to antigen 2) and phase I (directed to antigen 1) antibodies in sera from human Q fever convalescents. As to the absorbance values, the most sensitive was the antigen obtained by mild acid hydrolysis (0.1 mol/l HCl for 30 min. at 100 degrees C), followed by phase I corpuscular antigen treated trichloroacetic acid. Phase I antigen treated by K10(4) gave lower absorbance values. The performances of the commonly used complement fixation test and the more recently developed indirect immunofluorescence test were compared on 45 human sera. Immunofluorescence revealed specific antibodies in 62.2% of the sera. In the complement fixation test only 2.2% of sera were positive. ELISA proved superior (76.8% positive sera) to the immunofluorescence and complement fixation tests in detection of Q fever.</p>","PeriodicalId":76767,"journal":{"name":"Trudy Instituta imeni Pastera","volume":"66 ","pages":"119-26, 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trudy Instituta imeni Pastera","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purified phase I Coxiella burnetii corpuscles treated chemically in different ways (by potassium periodate, mild acid hydrolysis or trichloroacetic acid) were compared by ELISA for their ability to detect phase II (directed to antigen 2) and phase I (directed to antigen 1) antibodies in sera from human Q fever convalescents. As to the absorbance values, the most sensitive was the antigen obtained by mild acid hydrolysis (0.1 mol/l HCl for 30 min. at 100 degrees C), followed by phase I corpuscular antigen treated trichloroacetic acid. Phase I antigen treated by K10(4) gave lower absorbance values. The performances of the commonly used complement fixation test and the more recently developed indirect immunofluorescence test were compared on 45 human sera. Immunofluorescence revealed specific antibodies in 62.2% of the sera. In the complement fixation test only 2.2% of sera were positive. ELISA proved superior (76.8% positive sera) to the immunofluorescence and complement fixation tests in detection of Q fever.

【固相免疫酶分析(ELISA)——诊断Q热的试验(与补体固定法和免疫荧光法比较)】。
用ELISA法比较不同化学处理方法(高碘酸钾、轻度酸水解或三氯乙酸)纯化的ⅰ期伯纳氏克希菌小体在人Q热康复者血清中检测ⅱ期(针对抗原2)和ⅰ期(针对抗原1)抗体的能力。对于吸光度值,最敏感的是温和酸水解(0.1 mol/l HCl在100℃下水解30分钟)得到的抗原,其次是三氯乙酸处理的I期红细胞抗原。经K10(4)处理的I期抗原吸光度值较低。比较了常用的补体固定试验和最近发展起来的间接免疫荧光试验在45份人血清中的性能。免疫荧光显示62.2%的血清中有特异性抗体。补体固定试验阳性率仅为2.2%。ELISA检测Q热的阳性率为76.8%,优于免疫荧光法和补体固定法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信