BEHAVIOURAL SEASONAL ANOMALIES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE – VERIFICATION OF THE JANUARY EFFECT ON THE WSE IN WARSAW

Tomasz Pawlonka, Paweł Sypniewski
{"title":"BEHAVIOURAL SEASONAL ANOMALIES ON THE STOCK EXCHANGE – VERIFICATION OF THE JANUARY EFFECT ON THE WSE IN WARSAW","authors":"Tomasz Pawlonka, Paweł Sypniewski","doi":"10.22630/pefim.2023.29.78.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practice and empirical observations prove that achieving above-average returns on the stock market is possible. It is possible to achieve both higher and lower returns than those resulting from the fundamental value of the companies being valued. This condition is affected by anomalies that make the market ineffective. Numerous studies in behavioural finance show that the causes of market inefficiency are to be found in the incomplete rationality of investors. Numerous deviations of investor behaviour from the homo economicus model result from their cognitive and motivational limitations. Sometimes the mistakes of an individual investor are systematic – such systematic and massive errors take the form of heuristics that can influence the magnitude of market anomalies, including the occurrence of calendar effects. One of the best-known calendar anomalies is the January Effect. The January Effect is characterised by an increase in stock prices in January, andthe occurrence of the January Effect is expressed by the fact that the returns in January are the highest of the entire year. The research conducted on the Warsaw Stock Exchange confirmed the presence of the January Effect in small- and medium-sized companies. During the research, the presence of other calendar effects (related to the months of June and October) was also diagnosed.","PeriodicalId":34405,"journal":{"name":"Polityki Europejskie Finanse i Marketing","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polityki Europejskie Finanse i Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22630/pefim.2023.29.78.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practice and empirical observations prove that achieving above-average returns on the stock market is possible. It is possible to achieve both higher and lower returns than those resulting from the fundamental value of the companies being valued. This condition is affected by anomalies that make the market ineffective. Numerous studies in behavioural finance show that the causes of market inefficiency are to be found in the incomplete rationality of investors. Numerous deviations of investor behaviour from the homo economicus model result from their cognitive and motivational limitations. Sometimes the mistakes of an individual investor are systematic – such systematic and massive errors take the form of heuristics that can influence the magnitude of market anomalies, including the occurrence of calendar effects. One of the best-known calendar anomalies is the January Effect. The January Effect is characterised by an increase in stock prices in January, andthe occurrence of the January Effect is expressed by the fact that the returns in January are the highest of the entire year. The research conducted on the Warsaw Stock Exchange confirmed the presence of the January Effect in small- and medium-sized companies. During the research, the presence of other calendar effects (related to the months of June and October) was also diagnosed.
证券交易所的季节性行为异常——1月对华沙股市影响的验证
实践和实证观察证明,实现股票市场高于平均水平的回报是可能的。与被估值公司的基本价值相比,获得更高或更低的回报是可能的。这种情况受到使市场无效的异常现象的影响。行为金融学的大量研究表明,市场无效的原因在于投资者的不完全理性。投资者行为与经济人模型的许多偏差源于他们的认知和动机限制。有时,个人投资者的错误是系统性的——这种系统性和大规模的错误以启发式的形式出现,可以影响市场异常的程度,包括日历效应的发生。最著名的日历异常现象之一是“一月效应”。1月效应的特征是1月份股票价格的上涨,1月效应的发生表现为1月份的回报率是全年最高的。在华沙证券交易所进行的研究证实了“1月效应”在中小企业中的存在。在研究期间,其他日历效应(与6月和10月有关)的存在也被诊断出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信