Compression-distraction devices in the treatment of congenital disorders in children. Case series

S. V. Chuykin, O. Z. Topolnitsky, N. A. Davletshin, Kh. Kh. Ayubov, O. S. Chuykin, N. V. Makusheva, A. G. Bilak
{"title":"Compression-distraction devices in the treatment of congenital disorders in children. Case series","authors":"S. V. Chuykin, O. Z. Topolnitsky, N. A. Davletshin, Kh. Kh. Ayubov, O. S. Chuykin, N. V. Makusheva, A. G. Bilak","doi":"10.33925/1683-3031-2023-620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. In many cases, Pierre Robin sequence and congenital micrognathia lead to respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, and aspiration of food due to swallowing problems. Compression-distraction osteogenesis method allowed for the effective achievement of a stable clinical result with the minimum losses for the child's body. Purpose. The study aimed to conduct a retrospective analysis of various types of compression-distraction devices based on the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of the Republican Children's Clinical Hospital. Material and Methods. Since 2010, 36 children aged three months to 13 years have been operated, 20 boys and 16 girls. Four children were operated using an multi-vector external compression-distraction device. Two children with Pierre Robin sequence had surgery with a Conmet intraoral compression-distraction device, 27 children – with a KLS Martin bone-borne compression-distraction device, of which 15 had Pierre Robin sequence, and 12 had congenital lower micrognathia. Seven children had tracheostomy, which had been placed due to permanent sleep apnea. Results . Three (8.33%) children were operated using external compression-distraction devices. From three months to one year. A patient with Pierre Robin sequence, tracheostomy, and cannula. A tracheostomy was installed at the age of 15 days due to persistent apnea. At three months of age, bilateral osteotomy of the mandible with the installation of an external compression-distraction device was performed. Compression was for three days; then, they began distraction of one mm/day for 15 days. Five months later, the child began to breathe freely through the natural respiratory tract; under mask anesthesia, the compression-distraction device was removed. Four children (11.11%) aged 8 to 12 months were operated using multi-vector external compression-distraction device. A patient aged one year with Pierre Robin sequence, tracheostomy, and cannula. The external compression-distraction device was installed at the age of eight months. The distraction period was 12 days. The consolidation period was three months. The treatment result was independent breathing through the natural respiratory tract. The tracheostomy cannula was removed. Twenty-nine children 2 (5.56%) were operated using intraoral bone-borne compressiondistraction devices. A child aged 14 months, diagnosed with Pierre Robin sequence, complained of periodic sleep apnea with signs of acrocyanosis. Moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea was detected. A bilateral osteotomy of the mandible was performed, and a bone-borne compression-distraction device was installed. Compression was for three days, then the distraction of 0.5 mm twice a day – for 14 days. Distraction was performed at 14 mm. After five months, the bone-borne CDD was removed, and polysomnography was repeated. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was <5. Respiratory function was fully restored. Conclusion . Thus, 24 children showed successful results with the use of compression-distraction device (an orthognathic occlusion was formed, glossoptosis was eliminated, natural breathing and feeding were restored); 11 children did not have a satisfactory result (due to distraction interruption, it was not possible to achieve a physiological bite, there was postoperative wound suppuration with wound dehiscence). There was one negative result due to trauma: the child fell on his chin at home during the consolidation period, and the compression-distraction device broke, which resulted in disocclusion.","PeriodicalId":496491,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologiâ detskogo vozrasta i profilaktika","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologiâ detskogo vozrasta i profilaktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2023-620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. In many cases, Pierre Robin sequence and congenital micrognathia lead to respiratory failure, obstructive sleep apnea, and aspiration of food due to swallowing problems. Compression-distraction osteogenesis method allowed for the effective achievement of a stable clinical result with the minimum losses for the child's body. Purpose. The study aimed to conduct a retrospective analysis of various types of compression-distraction devices based on the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of the Republican Children's Clinical Hospital. Material and Methods. Since 2010, 36 children aged three months to 13 years have been operated, 20 boys and 16 girls. Four children were operated using an multi-vector external compression-distraction device. Two children with Pierre Robin sequence had surgery with a Conmet intraoral compression-distraction device, 27 children – with a KLS Martin bone-borne compression-distraction device, of which 15 had Pierre Robin sequence, and 12 had congenital lower micrognathia. Seven children had tracheostomy, which had been placed due to permanent sleep apnea. Results . Three (8.33%) children were operated using external compression-distraction devices. From three months to one year. A patient with Pierre Robin sequence, tracheostomy, and cannula. A tracheostomy was installed at the age of 15 days due to persistent apnea. At three months of age, bilateral osteotomy of the mandible with the installation of an external compression-distraction device was performed. Compression was for three days; then, they began distraction of one mm/day for 15 days. Five months later, the child began to breathe freely through the natural respiratory tract; under mask anesthesia, the compression-distraction device was removed. Four children (11.11%) aged 8 to 12 months were operated using multi-vector external compression-distraction device. A patient aged one year with Pierre Robin sequence, tracheostomy, and cannula. The external compression-distraction device was installed at the age of eight months. The distraction period was 12 days. The consolidation period was three months. The treatment result was independent breathing through the natural respiratory tract. The tracheostomy cannula was removed. Twenty-nine children 2 (5.56%) were operated using intraoral bone-borne compressiondistraction devices. A child aged 14 months, diagnosed with Pierre Robin sequence, complained of periodic sleep apnea with signs of acrocyanosis. Moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea was detected. A bilateral osteotomy of the mandible was performed, and a bone-borne compression-distraction device was installed. Compression was for three days, then the distraction of 0.5 mm twice a day – for 14 days. Distraction was performed at 14 mm. After five months, the bone-borne CDD was removed, and polysomnography was repeated. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was <5. Respiratory function was fully restored. Conclusion . Thus, 24 children showed successful results with the use of compression-distraction device (an orthognathic occlusion was formed, glossoptosis was eliminated, natural breathing and feeding were restored); 11 children did not have a satisfactory result (due to distraction interruption, it was not possible to achieve a physiological bite, there was postoperative wound suppuration with wound dehiscence). There was one negative result due to trauma: the child fell on his chin at home during the consolidation period, and the compression-distraction device broke, which resulted in disocclusion.
压缩-牵引装置在儿童先天性疾病治疗中的应用。案例系列
的相关性。在许多情况下,皮埃尔罗宾序列和先天性小颌畸形导致呼吸衰竭,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停,以及吞咽问题导致的食物误吸。压缩-牵张成骨方法可以有效地实现稳定的临床结果,并使儿童的身体损失最小。目的。本研究的目的是对共和儿童临床医院颌面外科的各种类型的压迫-牵引装置进行回顾性分析。材料和方法。自2010年以来,已有36名3个月至13岁的儿童接受了手术,其中20名男孩和16名女孩。4例患儿采用多矢量外压牵引装置进行手术。2例Pierre Robin序列患儿采用Conmet口内压缩-牵张装置,27例患儿采用KLS Martin骨载压缩-牵张装置,其中15例采用Pierre Robin序列,12例为先天性下小颌。7名儿童因永久性睡眠呼吸暂停而接受了气管切开术。结果。3例(8.33%)患儿采用外压牵引装置。从三个月到一年不等。皮埃尔·罗宾手术,气管切开术,插管。由于持续呼吸暂停,在15天时进行了气管切开术。在3个月大的时候,我们进行了双侧下颌骨截骨术,并安装了外压牵引装置。压缩是三天;然后,他们开始每天1毫米的分散注意力,持续15天。5个月后,孩子开始通过自然呼吸道自由呼吸;在面罩麻醉下,取下压迫-牵引装置。4例(11.11%)8 ~ 12月龄患儿采用多矢量外压牵引装置进行手术。1岁患者采用Pierre Robin序列,气管切开术,插管。在8个月大时安装外压牵引装置。分散期为12天。整固期为三个月。治疗结果为经自然呼吸道自主呼吸。取出气管切开术套管。29例(5.56%)患儿采用口内骨载压迫牵张器进行手术。一个14个月大的孩子,诊断为皮埃尔·罗宾序列,主诉周期性睡眠呼吸暂停伴有肢绀症状。发现中度至重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。进行双侧下颌骨截骨术,并安装骨载压缩-牵引装置。压缩3天,然后牵张0.5 mm,每天2次,连续14天。牵张在14mm处进行。5个月后,取出骨源性CDD,重复进行多导睡眠图检查。呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)为5。呼吸功能完全恢复。结论。因此,24例患儿使用挤压-牵张装置取得成功(形成正颌咬合,消除舌下垂,恢复自然呼吸和进食);11例患儿效果不理想(由于牵张中断,无法实现生理咬合,术后出现创面化脓伴创面裂开)。有一个由于外伤导致的阴性结果:孩子在巩固期间在家里摔倒在下巴上,压迫-牵引装置破裂,导致脱臼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信