A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Skill Training Session on Bandaging Techniques among 1st Semester B.Sc. Nursing Students

Ananda Kudari, Sumangala B R, Sumalatha ., B Yankamma
{"title":"A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Skill Training Session on Bandaging Techniques among 1st Semester B.Sc. Nursing Students","authors":"Ananda Kudari, Sumangala B R, Sumalatha ., B Yankamma","doi":"10.46610/jmsnpr.2023.v05i02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to assess the effectiveness of training sessions on knowledge and skill regarding selected bandaging techniques among 1st semester B.Sc. Nursing students. The pre experimental one group pre test post test design was used and a total of 40 subjects were selected by non probability convenient sampling technique. A structured knowledge questionnaire and observational skill checklist were used to assess the pre test and post test level of knowledge and skill performance. The training session was conducted for three hours. The collected data was analysed and interpreted using descriptive and inferential statistics. In this study, it was found that on the pre test, 97.5% (39) students had an average level of knowledge whereas the remaining 2.5% (1) had a good level of knowledge and on the Post test, 97.5% (39) of the students were scored good and remaining 2.5% (1) were having an average level of knowledge. In the pre test skill performance 87.5% (35) subjects were found to be inadequate whereas the remaining 12.5% (5) had adequate skills in the post test 12.5% (5) of the students were found to be Inadequate and the majority 87.5% (35) were shown adequate skill after the bandaging technique session. The mean score before manipulation was ±8.6 and the standard deviation was ±53.70 whereas after intervention Mean score was ±17.47 and the SD was ± 109.13. The mean difference was ± 8.87. The calculated „t‟ value ± 26.25 which was a greater value compared to the critical value i.e., ± 2.05 which depicts that significance at the 0.05 level. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected and the research hypothesis meanwhile accepted. This outcome indicates that the training session is effective in enhancing the knowledge of nursing students towards bandaging techniques. The skill performance of the mean score before manipulation was ±3.37 and the standard deviation was ±21.09 while after intervention mean score was ±8.57 and the SD was ± 53.43. The mean difference was ± 5.2. The calculated „t‟ value ± 32.34 which was a larger value compared to the table value i.e., ± 2.05 which illustrates that highly significant at the 0.05 level. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected and the research hypothesis was accepted. This outcome indicates that the training session was effective in enhancing the skills of 1st semester B.Sc. Nursing students towards bandaging techniques.","PeriodicalId":475463,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Surgical Nursing Practice and Reserach","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Surgical Nursing Practice and Reserach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46610/jmsnpr.2023.v05i02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to assess the effectiveness of training sessions on knowledge and skill regarding selected bandaging techniques among 1st semester B.Sc. Nursing students. The pre experimental one group pre test post test design was used and a total of 40 subjects were selected by non probability convenient sampling technique. A structured knowledge questionnaire and observational skill checklist were used to assess the pre test and post test level of knowledge and skill performance. The training session was conducted for three hours. The collected data was analysed and interpreted using descriptive and inferential statistics. In this study, it was found that on the pre test, 97.5% (39) students had an average level of knowledge whereas the remaining 2.5% (1) had a good level of knowledge and on the Post test, 97.5% (39) of the students were scored good and remaining 2.5% (1) were having an average level of knowledge. In the pre test skill performance 87.5% (35) subjects were found to be inadequate whereas the remaining 12.5% (5) had adequate skills in the post test 12.5% (5) of the students were found to be Inadequate and the majority 87.5% (35) were shown adequate skill after the bandaging technique session. The mean score before manipulation was ±8.6 and the standard deviation was ±53.70 whereas after intervention Mean score was ±17.47 and the SD was ± 109.13. The mean difference was ± 8.87. The calculated „t‟ value ± 26.25 which was a greater value compared to the critical value i.e., ± 2.05 which depicts that significance at the 0.05 level. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected and the research hypothesis meanwhile accepted. This outcome indicates that the training session is effective in enhancing the knowledge of nursing students towards bandaging techniques. The skill performance of the mean score before manipulation was ±3.37 and the standard deviation was ±21.09 while after intervention mean score was ±8.57 and the SD was ± 53.43. The mean difference was ± 5.2. The calculated „t‟ value ± 32.34 which was a larger value compared to the table value i.e., ± 2.05 which illustrates that highly significant at the 0.05 level. Therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected and the research hypothesis was accepted. This outcome indicates that the training session was effective in enhancing the skills of 1st semester B.Sc. Nursing students towards bandaging techniques.
护理学学士第一学期包扎技术技能训练课效果评价研究
本研究旨在评估护生第一学期所选包扎技术之知识与技能训练之效果。采用预实验一组前测后测设计,采用非概率方便抽样法抽取40名受试者。采用结构化知识问卷和观察性技能检查表对测试前和测试后的知识和技能表现水平进行评估。训练课进行了三个小时。收集到的数据使用描述性和推断性统计进行分析和解释。本研究发现,在前测中,97.5%(39人)的学生知识水平一般,其余2.5%(1人)的学生知识水平较好;在后测中,97.5%(39人)的学生知识水平较好,其余2.5%(1人)的学生知识水平一般。在测试前的技能表现中,87.5%(35)的学生被发现技能不足,而其余12.5%(5)的学生在测试后的技能表现中被发现技能不足,12.5%(5)的学生在包扎技术课程后被发现技能不足,大多数87.5%(35)的学生在包扎技术课程后表现出足够的技能。干预前平均得分为±8.6,标准差为±53.70;干预后平均得分为±17.47,标准差为±109.13。平均差值为±8.87。计算的“t”值±26.25,比临界值±2.05更大,在0.05水平上具有显著性。因此,零假设被拒绝,同时研究假设被接受。这一结果表明,培训课程有效地提高了护理学生对绑扎技术的认识。干预前的平均得分为±3.37,标准差为±21.09;干预后的平均得分为±8.57,标准差为±53.43。平均差值为±5.2。计算“t”值±32.34,比表中值±2.05更大,说明在0.05水平上具有高度显著性。因此,拒绝零假设,接受研究假设。结果表明,本课程能有效提高第一学期护理学士学生的包扎技术水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书