Американо-британські відносини (1997–2009 рр.)

О. І. Войтович
{"title":"Американо-британські відносини (1997–2009 рр.)","authors":"О. І. Войтович","doi":"10.31558/2519-2949.2023.3.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review of the «special relationship» between the United States and Great Britain in the period 1997–2009 through higher bilateral relations and joint activities in solving international problems in Europe and the Persian Gulf region. As result relations have proven their effectiveness, and countries became interdependent. The purpose of article is to research the activities of the Anglo-American Union in modern international forms. At the same time, the author solved the following tasks: to give an assessment of the «special relations» of the two countries through the prism of overcoming crisis phenomena, relying on the analysis of memoir literature as a source of research. The methods of research are comparative-historical and systematic, which provide an opportunity to objectively cover the subject of scientific research. Bilateral opinions during the second administration of President B. Clinton and Prime Minister T. Blair were quite productive. The two leaders demonstrated complete mutual understanding, a commonality of philosophical and political views, which they called the «third way», but differences in overcoming internal political, socio-economic and foreign political problems. It was one of the strongest tandems in bilateral relations in the years after the end of the Second World War. It proved its effectiveness in resolving the Kosovo problem, successfully completing its mission in Northern Ireland. No less intense and effective were the exchanges between President J.V. Bush and T. Blair despite their certain differences in political and philosophical views. Tragic Horseshoes On September 11, 2001, two leaders who fought international terrorism in Afghanistan met with the United States. Their activity against the regime of S. Hussein, who was called in the production of weapons of mass destruction, is not key, but its evaluations are contradictory. However, the Iraqi leader's non-constructive approach to solving this issue, which has long challenged the countries of the region, is worthy of harsh criticism. Memoir literature was the main source of the study of the «special» American-British relations and gave an opportunity to consider a certain variety of points of view on question that was investigated.","PeriodicalId":477981,"journal":{"name":"Політичне життя","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Політичне життя","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31558/2519-2949.2023.3.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Review of the «special relationship» between the United States and Great Britain in the period 1997–2009 through higher bilateral relations and joint activities in solving international problems in Europe and the Persian Gulf region. As result relations have proven their effectiveness, and countries became interdependent. The purpose of article is to research the activities of the Anglo-American Union in modern international forms. At the same time, the author solved the following tasks: to give an assessment of the «special relations» of the two countries through the prism of overcoming crisis phenomena, relying on the analysis of memoir literature as a source of research. The methods of research are comparative-historical and systematic, which provide an opportunity to objectively cover the subject of scientific research. Bilateral opinions during the second administration of President B. Clinton and Prime Minister T. Blair were quite productive. The two leaders demonstrated complete mutual understanding, a commonality of philosophical and political views, which they called the «third way», but differences in overcoming internal political, socio-economic and foreign political problems. It was one of the strongest tandems in bilateral relations in the years after the end of the Second World War. It proved its effectiveness in resolving the Kosovo problem, successfully completing its mission in Northern Ireland. No less intense and effective were the exchanges between President J.V. Bush and T. Blair despite their certain differences in political and philosophical views. Tragic Horseshoes On September 11, 2001, two leaders who fought international terrorism in Afghanistan met with the United States. Their activity against the regime of S. Hussein, who was called in the production of weapons of mass destruction, is not key, but its evaluations are contradictory. However, the Iraqi leader's non-constructive approach to solving this issue, which has long challenged the countries of the region, is worthy of harsh criticism. Memoir literature was the main source of the study of the «special» American-British relations and gave an opportunity to consider a certain variety of points of view on question that was investigated.
美英关系(1997-2009 年)
通过双边关系和在解决欧洲和波斯湾地区国际问题上的联合活动,回顾1997-2009年期间美英之间的“特殊关系”。结果证明,关系是有效的,各国相互依存。本文的目的是研究英美联盟在现代国际形式下的活动。同时,作者解决了以下任务:通过克服危机现象的棱镜,依靠回忆录文学的分析作为研究来源,对两国的“特殊关系”进行评估。研究方法是比较历史的和系统的,这为客观地涵盖科学研究的主题提供了机会。在克林顿总统和布莱尔首相的第二任期,双边意见颇有成效。两位领导人表现出完全的相互理解,哲学和政治观点的共同点,他们称之为“第三条道路”,但在克服国内政治,社会经济和外国政治问题方面存在分歧。这是第二次世界大战结束后双边关系中最强劲的组合之一。它在解决科索沃问题方面证明了它的有效性,成功地完成了在北爱尔兰的任务。尽管J.V.布什总统和T.布莱尔总统在政治和哲学观点上存在一定的差异,但他们之间的交流同样激烈而有效。2001年9月11日,两位在阿富汗打击国际恐怖主义的领导人会见了美国。他们反对制造大规模杀伤性武器的萨达姆政权的活动不是关键,但他们的评价是相互矛盾的。然而,伊拉克领导人解决这一长期困扰该地区各国的问题的非建设性做法值得严厉批评。回忆录文学是研究“特殊”美英关系的主要来源,并提供了一个机会来考虑对所调查问题的各种观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信