Contributions of flexor hallucis longus and brevis muscles to isometric toe flexor force production

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
K. Michael Rowley, Toshiyuki Kurihara, David Ortiz-Weissberg, Kornelia Kulig
{"title":"Contributions of flexor hallucis longus and brevis muscles to isometric toe flexor force production","authors":"K. Michael Rowley, Toshiyuki Kurihara, David Ortiz-Weissberg, Kornelia Kulig","doi":"10.37190/abb-02222-2023-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Morphological differences between the two primary great toe flexors – flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and flexor hallucis brevis (FHB) – likely drive differences in how these muscles contribute to functional toe flexion torque production. The aim of the study was to investigate FHL and FHB activation in two isometric toe flexion tasks – one called a “toe-pushing” task with the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints extended and the interphalangeal (IP) joints in neutral and another called a “toe-gripping” task with the MTP joints in neutral and flexed IP joints. Methods Twenty participants’ FHL and FHB muscles were instrumented with intramuscular electromyography electrodes. Muscle activation was normalized to a maximum voluntary contraction and compared between the two isometric toe flexor force production tasks. Results Overall, participants utilized these two toe flexors completely differently in the two tasks. In the toe-gripping task, the FHL was activated to a much greater extent than the FHB. In fact, 18 our of 20 participants activated FHL at more than seventy percent maximum voluntary contraction and half of participants activated FHB at less than ten percent. In contrast, muscle activation during the toe-pushing task appeared more reliant on the FHB for most participants. Conclusions Different contributions from the FHL and FHB to toe flexor force production in these two tasks are potentially driven by differences in muscle functional length among other factors. These findings help to inform the selection of rehabilitation and training exercises meant to preferentially target intrinsic or extrinsic foot musculature.","PeriodicalId":6897,"journal":{"name":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/abb-02222-2023-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Morphological differences between the two primary great toe flexors – flexor hallucis longus (FHL) and flexor hallucis brevis (FHB) – likely drive differences in how these muscles contribute to functional toe flexion torque production. The aim of the study was to investigate FHL and FHB activation in two isometric toe flexion tasks – one called a “toe-pushing” task with the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints extended and the interphalangeal (IP) joints in neutral and another called a “toe-gripping” task with the MTP joints in neutral and flexed IP joints. Methods Twenty participants’ FHL and FHB muscles were instrumented with intramuscular electromyography electrodes. Muscle activation was normalized to a maximum voluntary contraction and compared between the two isometric toe flexor force production tasks. Results Overall, participants utilized these two toe flexors completely differently in the two tasks. In the toe-gripping task, the FHL was activated to a much greater extent than the FHB. In fact, 18 our of 20 participants activated FHL at more than seventy percent maximum voluntary contraction and half of participants activated FHB at less than ten percent. In contrast, muscle activation during the toe-pushing task appeared more reliant on the FHB for most participants. Conclusions Different contributions from the FHL and FHB to toe flexor force production in these two tasks are potentially driven by differences in muscle functional length among other factors. These findings help to inform the selection of rehabilitation and training exercises meant to preferentially target intrinsic or extrinsic foot musculature.
长屈肌和短屈肌对等长趾屈肌力产生的贡献
目的:两种主要的大脚趾屈肌-幻觉长屈肌(FHL)和幻觉短屈肌(FHB)之间的形态差异可能导致这些肌肉在如何促进功能性脚趾屈曲扭矩产生方面的差异。该研究的目的是研究FHL和FHB在两种等距趾屈曲任务中的激活情况——一种是“推脚趾”任务,其中跖趾(MTP)关节伸展,指间(IP)关节处于中立状态;另一种是“抓脚趾”任务,其中跖趾(MTP)关节处于中立状态,指间关节处于屈曲状态。方法分别对20例被试的FHL和FHB肌肉进行肌内肌电测量。肌肉激活归一化到最大的自愿收缩,并比较了两个等长趾屈肌力生产任务。结果总体而言,参与者在两个任务中使用这两个脚趾屈肌完全不同。在抓脚趾任务中,FHL比FHB被激活的程度要大得多。事实上,20名参与者中有18人在超过70%的最大自愿收缩时激活FHL,一半的参与者在小于10%的最大自愿收缩时激活FHL。相反,对大多数参与者来说,推脚趾任务中的肌肉激活似乎更依赖于FHB。结论FHL和FHB对这两种任务中脚趾屈肌力量产生的不同贡献可能是由肌肉功能长度和其他因素的差异驱动的。这些发现有助于告知康复和训练运动的选择,意味着优先针对内在或外在的足部肌肉组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics
Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics BIOPHYSICS-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics is a platform allowing presentation of investigations results, exchange of ideas and experiences among researchers with technical and medical background. Papers published in Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: Tissue Biomechanics, Orthopedic Biomechanics, Biomaterials, Sport Biomechanics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信