Family Physicians’ Roles in Long-Term Care Homes and Other Congregate Residential Care Settings during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study

Q2 Health Professions
Maria Mathews, Jennifer Xiao, Lindsay Hedden, Julia Lukewich, Emily Gard Marshall, Richard Buote, Leslie Meredith, Lauren Moritz, Dana Ryan, Sarah Spencer, Shabnam Asghari, Paul S. Gill, Jamie Wickett, Eric Wong
{"title":"Family Physicians’ Roles in Long-Term Care Homes and Other Congregate Residential Care Settings during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Maria Mathews, Jennifer Xiao, Lindsay Hedden, Julia Lukewich, Emily Gard Marshall, Richard Buote, Leslie Meredith, Lauren Moritz, Dana Ryan, Sarah Spencer, Shabnam Asghari, Paul S. Gill, Jamie Wickett, Eric Wong","doi":"10.31389/jltc.229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionally affected long-term care (LTC) homes and other community-based congregate residential care settings. Although family physicians (FPs) play important roles in the care of residents in LTC homes, provincial pandemic plans make few references to their specific roles in LTC. Objective: To examine the experiences of FPs providing care in LTC homes and other congregate care settings in Canada during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021). Methods: As part of a multiple case study, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with FPs across four Canadian regions. Interviews were transcribed, and a thematic analysis approach was employed. Findings: Twenty-one of the 68 FPs interviewed discussed providing care in congregate residential settings, including LTC. We identified three major themes: 1) the roles of FPs in community-based congregate residential care settings during a pandemic, 2) modification of the delivery of routine care, and 3) special workforce considerations in pandemic response for community-based congregate residential care settings. Limitations: We interviewed FPs in four Canadian jurisdictions between October 2020 and June 2021; findings may not be generalisable to later pandemic stages or to other provinces. Our recruitment strategy did not specifically target FPs who worked in different types of congregate residential care facilities; further research is needed to examine these settings in greater depth. Implications: FPs have a unique understanding of the populations they serve and are well suited to plan and implement community-adaptive procedures. Future pandemic plans should implement LTC-related FP roles during the pre-pandemic stage of a pandemic response.","PeriodicalId":73807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionally affected long-term care (LTC) homes and other community-based congregate residential care settings. Although family physicians (FPs) play important roles in the care of residents in LTC homes, provincial pandemic plans make few references to their specific roles in LTC. Objective: To examine the experiences of FPs providing care in LTC homes and other congregate care settings in Canada during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021). Methods: As part of a multiple case study, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with FPs across four Canadian regions. Interviews were transcribed, and a thematic analysis approach was employed. Findings: Twenty-one of the 68 FPs interviewed discussed providing care in congregate residential settings, including LTC. We identified three major themes: 1) the roles of FPs in community-based congregate residential care settings during a pandemic, 2) modification of the delivery of routine care, and 3) special workforce considerations in pandemic response for community-based congregate residential care settings. Limitations: We interviewed FPs in four Canadian jurisdictions between October 2020 and June 2021; findings may not be generalisable to later pandemic stages or to other provinces. Our recruitment strategy did not specifically target FPs who worked in different types of congregate residential care facilities; further research is needed to examine these settings in greater depth. Implications: FPs have a unique understanding of the populations they serve and are well suited to plan and implement community-adaptive procedures. Future pandemic plans should implement LTC-related FP roles during the pre-pandemic stage of a pandemic response.
在COVID-19大流行期间,家庭医生在长期护理院和其他集中住宿护理机构中的作用:一项定性研究
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行对长期护理之家和其他社区聚集性寄宿护理机构的影响尤为严重。尽管家庭医生在LTC住院者的护理中发挥着重要作用,但省级大流行计划很少提及他们在LTC中的具体作用。目的:研究2019冠状病毒病大流行第一年(2020–2021)在加拿大LTC家庭和其他聚集性护理机构提供护理的FPs的经验。方法:作为多案例研究的一部分,我们对加拿大四个地区的FPs进行了半结构化定性访谈。访谈记录下来,并采用专题分析方法。调查结果:68名接受采访的家庭护理人员中有21人讨论了在包括LTC在内的集中居住环境中提供护理。我们确定了三个主要主题:1)大流行期间社区综合寄宿护理机构中FPs的作用,2)常规护理提供的修改,以及3)社区综合寄宿护理机构应对大流行时对劳动力的特殊考虑。限制:我们在2020年10月至2021年6月期间在四个加拿大司法管辖区采访了FPs;调查结果可能无法推广到大流行后期或其他省份。我们的招聘策略并没有专门针对在不同类型的综合住宿护理机构工作的FPs;需要进一步的研究来更深入地检查这些设置。启示:FPs对他们所服务的人群有独特的理解,非常适合计划和实施社区适应程序。未来的大流行计划应在大流行应对的大流行前阶段实施与长期合作有关的计划生育角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信