{"title":"PENGARUH METODE BRAINSTORMING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS PESERTA DIDIK PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATERI SISTEM PENCERNAAN MANUSIA","authors":"Mona Desti Ersa, Elvira Destiansari, Syarifah Syarifah, Tiara Dwi Anjani","doi":"10.19109/bioilmi.v9i1.16780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional learning method are educators results in the learning process becoming boring and hindering the students' way of thinking in comprehending a material. This study aims to obtain data and the influence of the use of brainstorming learning methods on the critical thinking skills of class VIII students on the material of the human digestive system. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 40 Palembang. The research design used was nonequivalent control group with quasi-experimental design. The research sample used was class VIII.3 as an experimental class totaling 32 students and class VIII.4 as a control class totaling 32 students. Data collection was taken using interview techniques, tests of critical thinking questions, and documentation. The results of the data analysis show that the brainstorming method has an influence on students' critical thinking skills. This can be seen from the t-test results that show that the value of tcount> ttable (3,447>2,042) or the significance value is less than 0.05 (0.001<0.05) then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. The average results of the experimental class data analysis reached 73.59; while the control class reached 63,69 meaning that the critical thinking ability of the experimental class students was higher than the control class's critical thinking ability. The method of brainstorming influences the critical thinking skills.
","PeriodicalId":492965,"journal":{"name":"Bioilmi : jurnal pendidikan","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioilmi : jurnal pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19109/bioilmi.v9i1.16780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The conventional learning method are educators results in the learning process becoming boring and hindering the students' way of thinking in comprehending a material. This study aims to obtain data and the influence of the use of brainstorming learning methods on the critical thinking skills of class VIII students on the material of the human digestive system. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 40 Palembang. The research design used was nonequivalent control group with quasi-experimental design. The research sample used was class VIII.3 as an experimental class totaling 32 students and class VIII.4 as a control class totaling 32 students. Data collection was taken using interview techniques, tests of critical thinking questions, and documentation. The results of the data analysis show that the brainstorming method has an influence on students' critical thinking skills. This can be seen from the t-test results that show that the value of tcount> ttable (3,447>2,042) or the significance value is less than 0.05 (0.001<0.05) then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. The average results of the experimental class data analysis reached 73.59; while the control class reached 63,69 meaning that the critical thinking ability of the experimental class students was higher than the control class's critical thinking ability. The method of brainstorming influences the critical thinking skills.
传统的学习方法导致学习过程变得枯燥,阻碍了学生理解材料的思维方式。本研究旨在获取数据,以及使用头脑风暴学习方法对八年级学生批判性思维能力对人体消化系统材料的影响。这项研究是在SMP Negeri 40巨港进行的。研究设计采用准实验设计的非等效对照组。研究样本采用VIII.3班作为实验班共32名学生,VIII.4班作为对照班共32名学生。数据收集采用访谈技术、批判性思维问题测试和文档。数据分析的结果表明,头脑风暴法对学生的批判性思维能力有影响。这可以从t检验结果中看出,tcount>表(3,447>2,042)或显著性值小于0.05 (0.001<0.05),则拒绝H0,接受H1。实验班数据分析平均成绩达到73.59分;控制班学生的批判性思维能力达到63,69,说明实验班学生的批判性思维能力高于控制班学生。头脑风暴的方法影响批判性思维技能。