‘Slaves’ Without Coercion? Work-Related Classification Patterns Among Romanian Migrant Workers

Christian Sperneac-Wolfer, Andrei Botorog, Ferdinand Sutterlüty
{"title":"‘Slaves’ Without Coercion? Work-Related Classification Patterns Among Romanian Migrant Workers","authors":"Christian Sperneac-Wolfer, Andrei Botorog, Ferdinand Sutterlüty","doi":"10.33788/sr.21.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tens of thousands of Romanian migrants work in the German construction sector. Their work is often characterized by unpaid wages, long workdays and by the withholding of sick or holiday payments. The risky and exploitative nature of the conditions under which Romanian migrants work on German construction sites is reflected in their negative evaluation of their engagements as “slave labor” by Romanian workers. Starting from such a clearly negative evaluation, the paper asks how Romanian construction workers in Germany classify their work and what role such classifications have within the context of labor exploitation. Based on qualitative interviews with and participant observation among Romanian construction site workers in Germany and in Romania, the article reconstructs four work classifications. Work may be interpreted as the fulfillment of obligations or as necessary for economic revenue; hard work itself can be a symbolic contribution to one’s own sense of identity or it can have the meaning of being part of everyday normalcy. Each of the work classifications offers a different reason to make hard work plausible in the eyes of the workers and employers actively turn such interpretations into a mechanism of vulnerability. Without direct physical coercion, these ideas motivate workers to take on work that they themselves criticize as ‘slave labor.’ The paper concludes by arguing that the recognition of such classifications and their social effects are crucial for an understanding of labor exploitation.","PeriodicalId":34074,"journal":{"name":"Sociologie Romaneasca","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologie Romaneasca","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33788/sr.21.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tens of thousands of Romanian migrants work in the German construction sector. Their work is often characterized by unpaid wages, long workdays and by the withholding of sick or holiday payments. The risky and exploitative nature of the conditions under which Romanian migrants work on German construction sites is reflected in their negative evaluation of their engagements as “slave labor” by Romanian workers. Starting from such a clearly negative evaluation, the paper asks how Romanian construction workers in Germany classify their work and what role such classifications have within the context of labor exploitation. Based on qualitative interviews with and participant observation among Romanian construction site workers in Germany and in Romania, the article reconstructs four work classifications. Work may be interpreted as the fulfillment of obligations or as necessary for economic revenue; hard work itself can be a symbolic contribution to one’s own sense of identity or it can have the meaning of being part of everyday normalcy. Each of the work classifications offers a different reason to make hard work plausible in the eyes of the workers and employers actively turn such interpretations into a mechanism of vulnerability. Without direct physical coercion, these ideas motivate workers to take on work that they themselves criticize as ‘slave labor.’ The paper concludes by arguing that the recognition of such classifications and their social effects are crucial for an understanding of labor exploitation.
没有强迫的“奴隶”?罗马尼亚移徙工人的工作分类模式
成千上万的罗马尼亚移民在德国建筑业工作。她们的工作特点往往是不付工资,长时间工作,不支付病假或假期工资。罗马尼亚移民在德国建筑工地工作的危险和剥削性质反映在他们对罗马尼亚工人的“奴隶劳动”的负面评价上。从这样一个明显的负面评价出发,本文询问德国的罗马尼亚建筑工人如何对他们的工作进行分类,以及这种分类在劳动剥削背景下的作用。基于对德国和罗马尼亚罗马尼亚建筑工地工人的定性访谈和参与观察,本文重构了四种工作分类。工作可以解释为履行义务或获得经济收入所必需的;努力工作本身可以是一种对个人身份认同感的象征性贡献,也可以是日常正常生活的一部分。每一种工作分类都提供了不同的理由,使努力工作在工人眼中变得合理,而雇主则积极地将这种解释转化为一种脆弱性机制。在没有直接身体强迫的情况下,这些想法激励工人从事他们自己批评为“奴隶劳动”的工作。论文的结论是,认识到这种分类及其社会影响对于理解劳动剥削至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信