Some issues of the administrative and jurisdiction activities of the territorial centers of recruitment and social support in Ukraine

Oleksiy Ostapenko, Oksana Baik
{"title":"Some issues of the administrative and jurisdiction activities of the territorial centers of recruitment and social support in Ukraine","authors":"Oleksiy Ostapenko, Oksana Baik","doi":"10.23939/law2023.38.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the administrative and jurisdictional powers of territorial recruitment and social support centers regarding military accounting under martial law. The terminology and peculiarities of its use in the consideration of administrative offenses, the responsibility for which is provided for by Articles 210, 210-1, 211 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses, are considered. In particular, it was noted that citizens’ compliance with the rules of military accounting involves a number of restrictions of a coercive nature and in most cases contains informational content, as well as the obligation to comply with the order of a military body or official authorized to do so. For a more thorough analysis of the administrative-jurisdictional activity of territorial recruitment and social training centers, attention is paid to the administrative-legal consolidation by the legislator of the terms that characterize the legal status of a person during military service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations. The terms «draft», «call», «assembly point», which have a legal meaning in the qualification of administrative offenses for violating the rules of military accounting, are also analyzed. The urgency of considering the administrative jurisdiction of the territorial centers of recruitment and social support regarding compliance with the order and rules of military record keeping in Ukraine was emphasized. It is noted that the content of Articles 210, 210-1, 211 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses does not provide for the implementation and specifics of violations of the rules of military accounting. It was concluded that the administrative-jurisdictional activity of the territorial recruitment and social support centers regarding the violation of military accounting rules is carried out in accordance with the current legislation of Ukraine and other normative legal acts regulating military service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations. At the same time, the following remain controversial provisions on: 1) description of the unlawful behavior of the subjects set forth in Articles 210, 210-1, 211 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; 2) interpretation of the terms characterizing military service and having legal significance for the qualification of this type of offense.","PeriodicalId":490087,"journal":{"name":"Вісник Національного університету \"Львівська політехніка\"","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вісник Національного університету \"Львівська політехніка\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.38.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the administrative and jurisdictional powers of territorial recruitment and social support centers regarding military accounting under martial law. The terminology and peculiarities of its use in the consideration of administrative offenses, the responsibility for which is provided for by Articles 210, 210-1, 211 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses, are considered. In particular, it was noted that citizens’ compliance with the rules of military accounting involves a number of restrictions of a coercive nature and in most cases contains informational content, as well as the obligation to comply with the order of a military body or official authorized to do so. For a more thorough analysis of the administrative-jurisdictional activity of territorial recruitment and social training centers, attention is paid to the administrative-legal consolidation by the legislator of the terms that characterize the legal status of a person during military service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations. The terms «draft», «call», «assembly point», which have a legal meaning in the qualification of administrative offenses for violating the rules of military accounting, are also analyzed. The urgency of considering the administrative jurisdiction of the territorial centers of recruitment and social support regarding compliance with the order and rules of military record keeping in Ukraine was emphasized. It is noted that the content of Articles 210, 210-1, 211 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses does not provide for the implementation and specifics of violations of the rules of military accounting. It was concluded that the administrative-jurisdictional activity of the territorial recruitment and social support centers regarding the violation of military accounting rules is carried out in accordance with the current legislation of Ukraine and other normative legal acts regulating military service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations. At the same time, the following remain controversial provisions on: 1) description of the unlawful behavior of the subjects set forth in Articles 210, 210-1, 211 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses; 2) interpretation of the terms characterizing military service and having legal significance for the qualification of this type of offense.
乌克兰领土征聘和社会支助中心的行政和管辖活动的一些问题
本文分析了戒严令下地方征兵和社会支援中心在军事会计方面的管理权和管辖权。审议了在审议《乌克兰行政犯罪法》第210条、第210-1条和第211条规定的责任的行政违法行为时使用该法的术语和特点。特别是,有人指出,公民遵守军事会计规则涉及一些具有强制性质的限制,在大多数情况下包括资料内容,以及遵守军事机构或获授权官员的命令的义务。为了对领土征兵和社会培训中心的行政管辖活动进行更彻底的分析,注意到立法者在行政法律上巩固了在乌克兰武装部队和其他军事编队服兵役期间具有法律地位特征的条件。分析了在违反军事会计制度的行政违法认定条件中具有法律意义的“征兵”、“征召”、“集结点”等词语。强调迫切需要审议领土征聘和社会支助中心在遵守乌克兰军事记录的秩序和规则方面的行政管辖权。应当指出,《乌克兰行政违法法》第210条、第210-1条和第211条的内容没有规定违反军事会计规则的执行和具体情况。结论是,领土征聘和社会支助中心关于违反军事会计规则的行政管辖活动是根据乌克兰现行立法和其他规范乌克兰武装部队和其他军事编制服兵役的规范性法律行为进行的。与此同时,以下条款仍然存在争议:1)对《乌克兰行政犯罪法》第210条、第210-1条和第211条所列主体的非法行为的描述;(2)对兵役特征和具有法律意义的术语的解释,以确定这类犯罪的资格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信