Rethinking Driving Assessment: A Hypothesis-Driven Proposal for Cognitive Evaluation

Jose Luis Tapia, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
{"title":"Rethinking Driving Assessment: A Hypothesis-Driven Proposal for Cognitive Evaluation","authors":"Jose Luis Tapia, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia","doi":"10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2304187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Driving is a critical aspect of personal mobility and autonomy, but ensuring road safety requires a comprehensive evaluation of driving abilities beyond self-reported behaviors and practical skills. This article emphasizes the importance of cognitive assessment in determining fitness to drive and explores the potential benefits of using digital tools for such evaluations to enhance road safety. Implementing these digital tools does come with challenges, such as unfamiliarity with digital cognitive reviews for some and the requirement of adaptability to evaluate cognitive skills across various age demographics. Additionally, the absence of standardization in driving assessments across different regions can result in inconsistencies in judging who is fit to drive. Despite these hurdles, integrating digital cognitive evaluations and training into conducting assessments and educational initiatives can more effectively comprehend and address mental aspects of driving, thereby potentially reducing crash risk and promoting road safety. This hypothesis-driven approach proposes that a thorough assessment of an individual's readiness to drive, focusing on vital cognitive domains associated with safe driving, can contribute to safer roads and yield substantial social, economic, and personal benefits. We encourage future research and educators to consider these insights when developing driving education programs and assessments of driving fitness.","PeriodicalId":74334,"journal":{"name":"OBM neurobiology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OBM neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2304187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driving is a critical aspect of personal mobility and autonomy, but ensuring road safety requires a comprehensive evaluation of driving abilities beyond self-reported behaviors and practical skills. This article emphasizes the importance of cognitive assessment in determining fitness to drive and explores the potential benefits of using digital tools for such evaluations to enhance road safety. Implementing these digital tools does come with challenges, such as unfamiliarity with digital cognitive reviews for some and the requirement of adaptability to evaluate cognitive skills across various age demographics. Additionally, the absence of standardization in driving assessments across different regions can result in inconsistencies in judging who is fit to drive. Despite these hurdles, integrating digital cognitive evaluations and training into conducting assessments and educational initiatives can more effectively comprehend and address mental aspects of driving, thereby potentially reducing crash risk and promoting road safety. This hypothesis-driven approach proposes that a thorough assessment of an individual's readiness to drive, focusing on vital cognitive domains associated with safe driving, can contribute to safer roads and yield substantial social, economic, and personal benefits. We encourage future research and educators to consider these insights when developing driving education programs and assessments of driving fitness.
重新思考驱动评估:认知评估的假设驱动建议
驾驶是个人机动性和自主性的一个关键方面,但确保道路安全需要对驾驶能力进行全面评估,而不仅仅是自我报告的行为和实践技能。本文强调了认知评估在确定驾驶适应性方面的重要性,并探讨了使用数字工具进行此类评估以提高道路安全的潜在好处。实施这些数字工具确实面临挑战,例如一些人不熟悉数字认知评估,以及评估不同年龄人口统计数据的认知技能的适应性要求。此外,不同地区的驾驶评估缺乏标准化,可能导致判断谁适合驾驶的不一致。尽管存在这些障碍,但将数字认知评估和培训整合到评估和教育计划中,可以更有效地理解和解决驾驶的心理问题,从而有可能降低碰撞风险并促进道路安全。这种假设驱动的方法提出,对一个人的驾驶准备进行彻底的评估,关注与安全驾驶相关的重要认知领域,可以有助于更安全的道路,并产生巨大的社会、经济和个人利益。我们鼓励未来的研究和教育工作者在制定驾驶教育计划和评估驾驶健康时考虑这些见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信