Breaking Free from Field Layers: The Interest of Post-excavation Stratigraphies (PES) for Producing Reliable Archaeological Interpretations and Increasing Chronological Resolution

IF 1.8 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Emmanuel Discamps, Marc Thomas, Christelle Dancette, Brad Gravina, Sébastien Plutniak, Aurélien Royer, Alexandre Angelin, François Bachellerie, Cédric Beauval, Jean-Guillaume Bordes, Marianne Deschamps, Mathieu Langlais, Véronique Laroulandie, Jean-Baptiste Mallye, Alexandre Michel, Thomas Perrin, William Rendu
{"title":"Breaking Free from Field Layers: The Interest of Post-excavation Stratigraphies (PES) for Producing Reliable Archaeological Interpretations and Increasing Chronological Resolution","authors":"Emmanuel Discamps, Marc Thomas, Christelle Dancette, Brad Gravina, Sébastien Plutniak, Aurélien Royer, Alexandre Angelin, François Bachellerie, Cédric Beauval, Jean-Guillaume Bordes, Marianne Deschamps, Mathieu Langlais, Véronique Laroulandie, Jean-Baptiste Mallye, Alexandre Michel, Thomas Perrin, William Rendu","doi":"10.1007/s41982-023-00155-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In order to track diachronic changes in archaeological sequences, researchers typically partition time into stratigraphic layers defined during fieldwork, which serve as the framework for ensuing analyses. These analytical units have a significant impact on archaeological inference, defining its resolution, and influencing both the study of cultural assemblages and the reconstruction of past environments. However, field layers are seldom re-evaluated after excavation despite the fact that archaeological deposits are now commonly recognised as often containing material ‘mixed’ together by site formation processes, excavation techniques, or analytical practices. Although the analysis of intra-site spatial data clearly offers a means to overcome these issues, our literature review of 192 journal articles revealed the potential of this data (notably vertical projections of piece-plotted artefacts) to be under-exploited in prehistoric archaeology. Here, we advocate for the development of a more spatially informed framework for interpretation that we refer to as post-excavation stratigraphy or PES. After proposing a definition for PES, we attempt to develop a framework for theoretical considerations underlying their implication, importance, and potential. Three main benefits of PES are highlighted: ensuring assemblage reliability, increased chronological and spatial resolution, and more reliable interpretations based on a multi-stratigraphic approach. We contend that the stratigraphy defined during fieldwork is insufficient and potentially misleading. By providing a different “stratigraphic view” of the same sequence, each specialist can contribute data that, when combined, produces a better understanding of interactions between changes in, for example, technological or cultural traditions, subsistence strategies, or paleoenvironments.","PeriodicalId":73885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of paleolithic archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of paleolithic archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-023-00155-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In order to track diachronic changes in archaeological sequences, researchers typically partition time into stratigraphic layers defined during fieldwork, which serve as the framework for ensuing analyses. These analytical units have a significant impact on archaeological inference, defining its resolution, and influencing both the study of cultural assemblages and the reconstruction of past environments. However, field layers are seldom re-evaluated after excavation despite the fact that archaeological deposits are now commonly recognised as often containing material ‘mixed’ together by site formation processes, excavation techniques, or analytical practices. Although the analysis of intra-site spatial data clearly offers a means to overcome these issues, our literature review of 192 journal articles revealed the potential of this data (notably vertical projections of piece-plotted artefacts) to be under-exploited in prehistoric archaeology. Here, we advocate for the development of a more spatially informed framework for interpretation that we refer to as post-excavation stratigraphy or PES. After proposing a definition for PES, we attempt to develop a framework for theoretical considerations underlying their implication, importance, and potential. Three main benefits of PES are highlighted: ensuring assemblage reliability, increased chronological and spatial resolution, and more reliable interpretations based on a multi-stratigraphic approach. We contend that the stratigraphy defined during fieldwork is insufficient and potentially misleading. By providing a different “stratigraphic view” of the same sequence, each specialist can contribute data that, when combined, produces a better understanding of interactions between changes in, for example, technological or cultural traditions, subsistence strategies, or paleoenvironments.
从野外地层中挣脱出来:挖掘后地层(PES)对产生可靠的考古解释和增加年代分辨率的兴趣
为了追踪考古序列的历时变化,研究人员通常将时间划分为在野外工作中定义的地层层,作为后续分析的框架。这些分析单位对考古推断具有重大影响,定义其分辨率,并影响文化组合的研究和过去环境的重建。然而,尽管考古沉积物现在通常被认为是由现场形成过程、挖掘技术或分析实践“混合”在一起的物质,但在挖掘后很少对现场层进行重新评估。虽然对遗址内部空间数据的分析显然提供了克服这些问题的一种方法,但我们对192篇期刊文章的文献综述显示,这些数据(特别是碎片绘制的人工制品的垂直投影)在史前考古学中尚未得到充分利用。在这里,我们提倡发展一种更具空间信息的解释框架,我们称之为挖掘后地层学或PES。在提出了PES的定义之后,我们试图为其含义、重要性和潜力的理论考虑建立一个框架。PES的三个主要优点是:确保组合的可靠性,提高时间和空间分辨率,以及基于多地层方法的更可靠的解释。我们认为,在野外工作中确定的地层学是不充分的,并且可能具有误导性。通过对同一层序提供不同的“地层学观点”,每个专家都可以提供数据,这些数据结合起来,可以更好地理解技术或文化传统、生存策略或古环境等变化之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信