VALIDITAS ELEKTRONIK KONTRAK SYARIAH PADA FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY PT. DANA SYARIAH INDONESIA SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI AUTENTIK

Riska Wijayanti, Dewi Manda Angraini
{"title":"VALIDITAS ELEKTRONIK KONTRAK SYARIAH PADA FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY PT. DANA SYARIAH INDONESIA SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI AUTENTIK","authors":"Riska Wijayanti, Dewi Manda Angraini","doi":"10.24235/jm.v8i1.11544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A contract is always growing. Shalihun li kulli al-zaman wa al-makan its mean everything can develop according to the era and the masses, but the development of electronic contracts without meeting and seeing the person or object whether it meets the terms of the validity of the contract, while the easier it is to make contracts does not facilitate the emergence of many potential legal problems. The research problem is How is the validity of electronic contracts on fintech of the Indonesian Sharia Fund? Can electronic contracts executed virtually be used as authentic evidence? This research is normative legal research that uses primary and secondary data sources. The data obtained are processed using qualitative descriptive methods. The results of the study prove that based on the jhumur ulama electronic sharia contract can be said to be valid if it meets the conditions for the validity of the contract, namely; shigat, Al 'aqidan, ma'qud 'alaih, and maudhu' al 'aqd. While related to its function as an authentic evidence tool when it meets the formal and material requirements, its existence cannot stand alone and still requires other evidence. Keywords : Electronic Contract, Sharia Contract ; Authentic Evidence Tools , Fintech.","PeriodicalId":489041,"journal":{"name":"Al-Mustashfa : jurnal penelitian hukum ekonomi syariah","volume":"234 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Mustashfa : jurnal penelitian hukum ekonomi syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24235/jm.v8i1.11544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A contract is always growing. Shalihun li kulli al-zaman wa al-makan its mean everything can develop according to the era and the masses, but the development of electronic contracts without meeting and seeing the person or object whether it meets the terms of the validity of the contract, while the easier it is to make contracts does not facilitate the emergence of many potential legal problems. The research problem is How is the validity of electronic contracts on fintech of the Indonesian Sharia Fund? Can electronic contracts executed virtually be used as authentic evidence? This research is normative legal research that uses primary and secondary data sources. The data obtained are processed using qualitative descriptive methods. The results of the study prove that based on the jhumur ulama electronic sharia contract can be said to be valid if it meets the conditions for the validity of the contract, namely; shigat, Al 'aqidan, ma'qud 'alaih, and maudhu' al 'aqd. While related to its function as an authentic evidence tool when it meets the formal and material requirements, its existence cannot stand alone and still requires other evidence. Keywords : Electronic Contract, Sharia Contract ; Authentic Evidence Tools , Fintech.
电子伊斯兰教法合同在金融技术中的有效性 Pt.
契约总是在增长。它的意思是一切都可以根据时代和群众发展,但是电子合同的发展没有见面和看到的人或对象是否符合合同的效力条款,而更容易使合同不容易出现许多潜在的法律问题。研究的问题是印尼伊斯兰基金金融科技电子合约的有效性如何?虚拟签订的电子合同可以作为真实证据吗?本研究是规范的法律研究,使用第一手和第二手的数据来源。获得的数据使用定性描述方法进行处理。研究结果证明,基于jhumur ulama的电子伊斯兰教法合同,如果满足合同有效性的条件,即;shigat, Al 'aqidan, ma'qud 'alaih和maudhu' Al 'aqd。它在满足形式和物质条件的情况下,虽然与其作为真实证据工具的功能有关,但它不能单独存在,还需要其他证据。关键词:电子合同;伊斯兰教法合同;真实证据工具,金融科技。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信