The time perspectives of the dark tetrad in males and females: Preliminary findings of sex differences in sadism

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Boban Nedeljković, Lana Tucaković, Jana Dimoski
{"title":"The time perspectives of the dark tetrad in males and females: Preliminary findings of sex differences in sadism","authors":"Boban Nedeljković, Lana Tucaković, Jana Dimoski","doi":"10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. Understanding the relationship between the time perspectives and the Dark Tetrad can shed light on some of the mechanisms underlying these personality traits, and exploring potential sex differences in these relationships can contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the Dark Tetrad and its implications for both males and females. The previous studies produced valuable knowledge on the relationships between different time perspectives and the Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism), but they mainly neglected sex differences and have not considered sadism. This study aimed to explore Dark Tetrad and time perspectives association in males and females separately.Sample and settings. The sample included 350 participants (170 males and 180 females, aged 18 to 69) who completed the Short Dark Triad, the direct sadism scale from Varieties of Sadistic Tendencies, and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory.Hypotheses. It was assumed that Dark Tetrad traits would relate positively with the present-time perspectives in both sexes but stronger in males.Statistical analyses. After exploring the correlations at the baseline level, sex differences were examined by moderation analysis, followed by separate multiple regressions for both sexes.Results. The Dark Tetrad traits were mainly associated with present orientation in both sexes, with differences based on participants’ sex. Narcissism was more strongly related to the present hedonistic perspective in females, and psychopathy more strongly to the present fatalistic in males. Notably, sadism exhibited striking differences. In males, sadism was only related to the present fatalistic perspective, whereas in females, it was associated with present-hedonistic and past negative perspectives. This study provided initial insights into the time perspective of sadism, highlighting a potentially greater role of negative early-life experiences in females.Limitations. Sample characteristics, correlational design, single-measure dark traits assessment, and the lack of early-life events measure were discussed.","PeriodicalId":44544,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska Psychologie","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceskoslovenska Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.67.3-4.179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. Understanding the relationship between the time perspectives and the Dark Tetrad can shed light on some of the mechanisms underlying these personality traits, and exploring potential sex differences in these relationships can contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the Dark Tetrad and its implications for both males and females. The previous studies produced valuable knowledge on the relationships between different time perspectives and the Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and narcissism), but they mainly neglected sex differences and have not considered sadism. This study aimed to explore Dark Tetrad and time perspectives association in males and females separately.Sample and settings. The sample included 350 participants (170 males and 180 females, aged 18 to 69) who completed the Short Dark Triad, the direct sadism scale from Varieties of Sadistic Tendencies, and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory.Hypotheses. It was assumed that Dark Tetrad traits would relate positively with the present-time perspectives in both sexes but stronger in males.Statistical analyses. After exploring the correlations at the baseline level, sex differences were examined by moderation analysis, followed by separate multiple regressions for both sexes.Results. The Dark Tetrad traits were mainly associated with present orientation in both sexes, with differences based on participants’ sex. Narcissism was more strongly related to the present hedonistic perspective in females, and psychopathy more strongly to the present fatalistic in males. Notably, sadism exhibited striking differences. In males, sadism was only related to the present fatalistic perspective, whereas in females, it was associated with present-hedonistic and past negative perspectives. This study provided initial insights into the time perspective of sadism, highlighting a potentially greater role of negative early-life experiences in females.Limitations. Sample characteristics, correlational design, single-measure dark traits assessment, and the lack of early-life events measure were discussed.
黑暗四分体在男性和女性中的时间视角:虐待狂性别差异的初步发现
目标。理解时间视角和黑暗四分体之间的关系可以揭示这些人格特征背后的一些机制,探索这些关系中潜在的性别差异可以帮助我们更细致地理解黑暗四分体及其对男性和女性的影响。之前的研究对不同的时间视角和黑暗三位制(马基雅维利主义、精神病和自恋)之间的关系提供了有价值的知识,但他们主要忽略了性别差异,也没有考虑虐待狂。本研究旨在分别探讨男性和女性黑暗四分体与时间视角的关联。示例和设置。样本包括350名参与者(170名男性和180名女性,年龄在18到69岁之间),他们完成了短黑暗三合征、直接虐待倾向量表和津巴多时间视角量表。据推测,黑暗四分体的特征在两性中都与现在的观点呈正相关,但在男性中更强。统计分析。在探索了基线水平上的相关性之后,通过适度分析检查了性别差异,然后对两性进行了单独的多元回归。在两性中,黑暗四分体的特征主要与当前性取向有关,并根据参与者的性别而有所差异。女性的自恋倾向与当下享乐主义倾向相关,而男性的精神病态倾向与当下宿命论倾向相关。值得注意的是,虐待狂表现出惊人的差异。在男性中,施虐狂只与现在宿命论观点有关,而在女性中,施虐狂与现在享乐主义和过去消极观点有关。这项研究为虐待狂的时间视角提供了初步的见解,强调了女性早期负面生活经历的潜在更大作用。讨论了样本特征、相关设计、单测量黑暗特征评估以及早期生活事件测量的缺失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceskoslovenska Psychologie
Ceskoslovenska Psychologie PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Časopis Československá psychologie otiskuje původní, jinde nepublikované a jinému subjektu nenabídnuté práce, z oblasti psychologické teorie, metodologie, výzkumu a praxe. Pozitivně recenzované a redakční radou přijaté práce jsou zařazeny do příslušných rubrik (např. teoretické studie, výzkumné studie, přehledové studie, metodická sdělení, předběžná sdělení, diskuse, úvahy, příspěvky z jednotlivých oblastí praxe (např. z klinické praxe, zprávy, recenze).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信