Tolerants versus traditionalists: making sense of online conversations on the new Finnish flagship library Oodi

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES
Riie Heikkilä, Ossi Sirkka
{"title":"Tolerants versus traditionalists: making sense of online conversations on the new Finnish flagship library Oodi","authors":"Riie Heikkilä, Ossi Sirkka","doi":"10.1080/10286632.2023.2272841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public libraries play a unique role in preserving, maintaining, and distributing cultural capital freely. Currently, public libraries are said to be undergoing a change: from public spheres offering culture selected and curated by legitimated experts, libraries are seen to have shifted more towards social hubs. However, little is known about how potential library users perceive these alleged changes. In this article, we explore which topics emerge in online conversations about Oodi, Helsinki’s new central library, and what kinds of symbolic boundaries are drawn in them. Our data consist of tweets and comments on newspaper articles (N = 2,342). Using structural topic modelling and a qualitative thematic analysis, we identify eight different topics that appear to be highly polarised. We interpret the online conversations on Oodi as negotiations of the ownership of publicly funded culture and cultural capital. These negotiations are organised around two opposing poles: tolerant, cosmopolitan views versus traditional, conservative attitudes.","PeriodicalId":51520,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","volume":"51 18","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cultural Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2023.2272841","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public libraries play a unique role in preserving, maintaining, and distributing cultural capital freely. Currently, public libraries are said to be undergoing a change: from public spheres offering culture selected and curated by legitimated experts, libraries are seen to have shifted more towards social hubs. However, little is known about how potential library users perceive these alleged changes. In this article, we explore which topics emerge in online conversations about Oodi, Helsinki’s new central library, and what kinds of symbolic boundaries are drawn in them. Our data consist of tweets and comments on newspaper articles (N = 2,342). Using structural topic modelling and a qualitative thematic analysis, we identify eight different topics that appear to be highly polarised. We interpret the online conversations on Oodi as negotiations of the ownership of publicly funded culture and cultural capital. These negotiations are organised around two opposing poles: tolerant, cosmopolitan views versus traditional, conservative attitudes.
宽容与传统:理解芬兰新旗舰图书馆Oodi上的在线对话
公共图书馆在保护、维护和自由分配文化资本方面发挥着独特的作用。目前,据说公共图书馆正在经历一场变革:从提供由合法专家选择和策划的文化的公共领域,图书馆被视为更多地转向社会中心。然而,对于潜在的图书馆用户如何看待这些所谓的变化,人们知之甚少。在这篇文章中,我们探讨了关于赫尔辛基新中央图书馆Oodi的在线对话中出现的话题,以及在这些对话中绘制了什么样的象征性边界。我们的数据包括对报纸文章的推文和评论(N = 2342)。使用结构主题建模和定性主题分析,我们确定了八个似乎高度两极分化的不同主题。我们将Oodi上的在线对话理解为公共资助文化和文化资本所有权的谈判。这些谈判围绕着两个对立的极点展开:宽容的、世界主义的观点与传统的、保守的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信