A Comparative Outcomes Analysis: The Evolution and Growth of a Teledermatology Program to Accommodate High Patient Volumes

Skin Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.25251/skin.7.6.2
Leandra Doan, Marit Kreidel, MD, Jeffrey Benabio, MD, MBA, Gabriel Hernandez, BS, Walt Engler, BS, Linda Tolbert, MD, JD, EdD, MPH
{"title":"A Comparative Outcomes Analysis: The Evolution and Growth of a Teledermatology Program to Accommodate High Patient Volumes","authors":"Leandra Doan, Marit Kreidel, MD, Jeffrey Benabio, MD, MBA, Gabriel Hernandez, BS, Walt Engler, BS, Linda Tolbert, MD, JD, EdD, MPH","doi":"10.25251/skin.7.6.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Most teledermatology studies include reviews of programs on a limited scale, whereas there are fewer reports on how to expand a program to accommodate high patient volumes.&#x0D; Objective: To share our insights into the growth and maintenance of a teledermatology program that sees over 100,000 cases a year. &#x0D; Methods: Retrospective review of a teledermatology program between 2015 and 2022. Outcomes were compared between the initial phase from 2015-2017 and the maturation phase from 2018-2022.&#x0D; Results: In 2015, the teledermatology program was piloted in 3 hospital centers and expanded to 10 more centers by 2017. There was a total of 12,385 cases in 2015, which increased to 139,110 cases in 2022. Despite the dramatic increase in number of cases, our program adapted well: the initial phase of program development resulted in 69.2% of concerns being treated remotely, compared to 70.9% of submissions in the later years, p <0.001.&#x0D; Limitations: Overall generalizability as this study was performed in a large integrated health system.&#x0D; Discussion: We maintain that the following can help scale a teledermatology program: 1. Communication with all interested parties; 2. Streamlined implementation of technological devices; 3. Training for dermatologists and primary providers; 4. Image guidelines to maintain photo quality.","PeriodicalId":86868,"journal":{"name":"Skin","volume":"9 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.6.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most teledermatology studies include reviews of programs on a limited scale, whereas there are fewer reports on how to expand a program to accommodate high patient volumes. Objective: To share our insights into the growth and maintenance of a teledermatology program that sees over 100,000 cases a year. Methods: Retrospective review of a teledermatology program between 2015 and 2022. Outcomes were compared between the initial phase from 2015-2017 and the maturation phase from 2018-2022. Results: In 2015, the teledermatology program was piloted in 3 hospital centers and expanded to 10 more centers by 2017. There was a total of 12,385 cases in 2015, which increased to 139,110 cases in 2022. Despite the dramatic increase in number of cases, our program adapted well: the initial phase of program development resulted in 69.2% of concerns being treated remotely, compared to 70.9% of submissions in the later years, p <0.001. Limitations: Overall generalizability as this study was performed in a large integrated health system. Discussion: We maintain that the following can help scale a teledermatology program: 1. Communication with all interested parties; 2. Streamlined implementation of technological devices; 3. Training for dermatologists and primary providers; 4. Image guidelines to maintain photo quality.
比较结果分析:进化和成长的远程皮肤科计划,以适应高病人量
背景:大多数远程皮肤病学研究包括对有限规模的项目的回顾,而关于如何扩大项目以适应高患者量的报道较少。 目的:分享我们对每年超过10万例病例的远程皮肤科项目的发展和维护的见解。& # x0D;方法:对2015年至2022年的远程皮肤科项目进行回顾性分析。比较2015-2017年初创期与2018-2022年成熟期的结果。结果:2015年,远程皮肤科项目在3家医院中心试点,到2017年扩大到10多家中心。2015年共有12385例,2022年增加到139110例。尽管病例数量急剧增加,但我们的项目适应得很好:在项目开发的初始阶段,69.2%的问题得到了远程治疗,而在后来的几年里,这一比例为70.9%,p <0.001. 局限性:由于本研究是在一个大型综合卫生系统中进行的,因此总体上具有普遍性。 讨论:我们认为,以下可以帮助扩大远程皮肤科项目:1。与所有相关方的沟通;2. 简化技术装置的实施;3.对皮肤科医生和初级医生进行培训;4. 保持照片质量的图像指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书