Leandra Doan, Marit Kreidel, MD, Jeffrey Benabio, MD, MBA, Gabriel Hernandez, BS, Walt Engler, BS, Linda Tolbert, MD, JD, EdD, MPH
{"title":"A Comparative Outcomes Analysis: The Evolution and Growth of a Teledermatology Program to Accommodate High Patient Volumes","authors":"Leandra Doan, Marit Kreidel, MD, Jeffrey Benabio, MD, MBA, Gabriel Hernandez, BS, Walt Engler, BS, Linda Tolbert, MD, JD, EdD, MPH","doi":"10.25251/skin.7.6.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Most teledermatology studies include reviews of programs on a limited scale, whereas there are fewer reports on how to expand a program to accommodate high patient volumes.
 Objective: To share our insights into the growth and maintenance of a teledermatology program that sees over 100,000 cases a year. 
 Methods: Retrospective review of a teledermatology program between 2015 and 2022. Outcomes were compared between the initial phase from 2015-2017 and the maturation phase from 2018-2022.
 Results: In 2015, the teledermatology program was piloted in 3 hospital centers and expanded to 10 more centers by 2017. There was a total of 12,385 cases in 2015, which increased to 139,110 cases in 2022. Despite the dramatic increase in number of cases, our program adapted well: the initial phase of program development resulted in 69.2% of concerns being treated remotely, compared to 70.9% of submissions in the later years, p <0.001.
 Limitations: Overall generalizability as this study was performed in a large integrated health system.
 Discussion: We maintain that the following can help scale a teledermatology program: 1. Communication with all interested parties; 2. Streamlined implementation of technological devices; 3. Training for dermatologists and primary providers; 4. Image guidelines to maintain photo quality.","PeriodicalId":86868,"journal":{"name":"Skin","volume":"9 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.6.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Most teledermatology studies include reviews of programs on a limited scale, whereas there are fewer reports on how to expand a program to accommodate high patient volumes.
Objective: To share our insights into the growth and maintenance of a teledermatology program that sees over 100,000 cases a year.
Methods: Retrospective review of a teledermatology program between 2015 and 2022. Outcomes were compared between the initial phase from 2015-2017 and the maturation phase from 2018-2022.
Results: In 2015, the teledermatology program was piloted in 3 hospital centers and expanded to 10 more centers by 2017. There was a total of 12,385 cases in 2015, which increased to 139,110 cases in 2022. Despite the dramatic increase in number of cases, our program adapted well: the initial phase of program development resulted in 69.2% of concerns being treated remotely, compared to 70.9% of submissions in the later years, p <0.001.
Limitations: Overall generalizability as this study was performed in a large integrated health system.
Discussion: We maintain that the following can help scale a teledermatology program: 1. Communication with all interested parties; 2. Streamlined implementation of technological devices; 3. Training for dermatologists and primary providers; 4. Image guidelines to maintain photo quality.