The Effect of Previous Transradial Catheterization on Radial Forearm Free Flaps

Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1177/22925503231213872
Jamie A. Mawhinney, Craig A. Mounsey, Nick A. Johnson, Peter G. Russell
{"title":"The Effect of Previous Transradial Catheterization on Radial Forearm Free Flaps","authors":"Jamie A. Mawhinney, Craig A. Mounsey, Nick A. Johnson, Peter G. Russell","doi":"10.1177/22925503231213872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) are a versatile option for the reconstruction of a wide variety of soft tissue defects and are particularly common in head and neck surgery. Benefits of RFFF include a relatively short operating time, a long pedicle, and a thinner, more pliable flap. However, in addition to its role in reconstructive surgery, the radial artery may be utilized for a number of other procedures including coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. Concern has previously been raised that prior catheterization may deleteriously affect the function of the radial artery and in the field of cardiothoracic surgery, individuals are increasingly advising against its use as a graft for coronary artery bypass graft surgery in such circumstances. Despite this, little is known about the effect on RFFF. In this review article, we concisely consider the available evidence of the effect of previous transradial catheterization on the radial artery and discuss the implications for reconstructive surgery. We then summarize the key considerations regarding their use in current practice.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"32 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231213872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) are a versatile option for the reconstruction of a wide variety of soft tissue defects and are particularly common in head and neck surgery. Benefits of RFFF include a relatively short operating time, a long pedicle, and a thinner, more pliable flap. However, in addition to its role in reconstructive surgery, the radial artery may be utilized for a number of other procedures including coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions. Concern has previously been raised that prior catheterization may deleteriously affect the function of the radial artery and in the field of cardiothoracic surgery, individuals are increasingly advising against its use as a graft for coronary artery bypass graft surgery in such circumstances. Despite this, little is known about the effect on RFFF. In this review article, we concisely consider the available evidence of the effect of previous transradial catheterization on the radial artery and discuss the implications for reconstructive surgery. We then summarize the key considerations regarding their use in current practice.
分享
查看原文
先前经桡骨置管对前臂桡骨游离皮瓣的影响
桡骨前臂游离皮瓣(RFFF)是重建各种软组织缺损的通用选择,在头颈部手术中尤其常见。RFFF的优点包括相对较短的手术时间,较长的蒂,更薄,更柔韧的皮瓣。然而,除了在重建手术中发挥作用外,桡动脉还可用于许多其他手术,包括冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。先前的担忧是,先前的导管置入可能有害地影响桡动脉的功能,在心胸外科领域,越来越多的人建议在这种情况下,不要将其作为冠状动脉搭桥手术的移植物。尽管如此,人们对RFFF的影响知之甚少。在这篇综述文章中,我们简要地考虑了先前经桡动脉导管置入对桡动脉影响的现有证据,并讨论了重建手术的意义。然后,我们总结了在当前实践中使用它们的关键考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信