A Phase 3b Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis with Palmoplantar (Non-Pustular) Involvement

Skin Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.25251/skin.7.supp.256
Mark Lebwohl, Michael Bukhalo, Linda Stein Gold, Michelle Pelle, Bradley Glick, Mar Llamas-Velasco, Samuel Sanchez-Rivera, Tianyu Zhan, Leonidas Drogaris, Kevin Douglas, Greg St. John, Ramon Espaillat, Robert Bissonnette
{"title":"A Phase 3b Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Risankizumab in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis with Palmoplantar (Non-Pustular) Involvement","authors":"Mark Lebwohl, Michael Bukhalo, Linda Stein Gold, Michelle Pelle, Bradley Glick, Mar Llamas-Velasco, Samuel Sanchez-Rivera, Tianyu Zhan, Leonidas Drogaris, Kevin Douglas, Greg St. John, Ramon Espaillat, Robert Bissonnette","doi":"10.25251/skin.7.supp.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We evaluate safety and efficacy of risankizumab (RZB) vs. placebo (PBO) in adult patients with moderate-to-severe non-pustular palmoplantar psoriasis (PPPsO).&#x0D; Method: IMMprint, a Ph3b study evaluated safety and efficacy of RZB vs. PBO in moderate-to-severe PPPsO patients with a static physician’s global assessment(sPGA) of moderate or severe ≥3, palmoplantar psoriasis area and severity index(PPASI) ≥8 and at least 1 additional PsO plaque. The 52-week treatment was split into period A, patients randomized (1:1) to RZB 150-mg or PBO, and period B, patients continuing RZB or switching from PBO to RZB (PBO/RZB). Primary endpoint was achievement of palmoplantar investigator’s global assessment (ppIGA) 0/1 with at least 2-point reduction from baseline at Wk16. Ranked secondary endpoints include ≥75% &amp; 90% improvement in PPASI (PPASI75, PPASI90), sPGA 0/1 and 100% improvement in PPASI(PPASI100) at Wk16.&#x0D; Results: Of 174 enrolled, 87(mean age[SD]: 56.9[12.9] years) were randomized to RZB and 87(mean age[SD]: 53.9[14.3] years) were randomized to PBO. Baseline characteristics were similar except for numerical difference in PsA (RZB vs. PBO: 11.5% vs 4.6%, respectively). At Wk16, a significantly higher proportion receiving RZB achieved ppIGA 0/1 than PBO(33.3% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.006). Patients receiving RZB also demonstrated significantly higher responses than patients receiving PBO in all ranked secondary endpoints: PPASI75 (42.5% vs 14.9%, P < 0.001); PPASI90 (27.6% vs 5.7%, p<0.001); sPGA 0/1 (32.2% vs 11.5%, p < 0.001); and PPASI100 (17.2% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001). Four patients (3 RZB: 1 PBO) discontinued drug in period A. At Wk52, ppIGA 0/1 was achieved by 50.6% of RZB patients and 61.7% of PBO/RZB group. Proportion of patients achieving PPASI75 at Wk52 was 57.5%(RZB) vs. 65.4% (PBO/RZB). Achievement of sPGA 0/1 (%RZB vs. %PBO/RZB) was 43.7% vs. 66.7%; PPASI100 was achieved by 26.4% (RZB) and 37.0% (PBO/RZB) patients at Wk52. Proportion of patients with adverse events were 29.1%(RZB) and 23.0%(PBO) in period A, and 49.4%(RZB) and 35.8% (PBO/RZB) in period B. One RZB patient with prior cardiovascular risk factors had an adjudicated myocardial infarction and subsequently died after 140-day follow-up period. The number of patients with COVID-19 were 3 (RZB; 1 serious infection) and 2(PBO) in period A and 11 (RZB) and 7 (PBO/RZB) in period B.&#x0D; Conclusion: This study demonstrates RZB can provide effective improvement compared to PBO by Wk16 with continuous improvement until Wk52 with no new safety signals in patients with moderate-to-severe PPPsO.","PeriodicalId":86868,"journal":{"name":"Skin","volume":"69 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.supp.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We evaluate safety and efficacy of risankizumab (RZB) vs. placebo (PBO) in adult patients with moderate-to-severe non-pustular palmoplantar psoriasis (PPPsO). Method: IMMprint, a Ph3b study evaluated safety and efficacy of RZB vs. PBO in moderate-to-severe PPPsO patients with a static physician’s global assessment(sPGA) of moderate or severe ≥3, palmoplantar psoriasis area and severity index(PPASI) ≥8 and at least 1 additional PsO plaque. The 52-week treatment was split into period A, patients randomized (1:1) to RZB 150-mg or PBO, and period B, patients continuing RZB or switching from PBO to RZB (PBO/RZB). Primary endpoint was achievement of palmoplantar investigator’s global assessment (ppIGA) 0/1 with at least 2-point reduction from baseline at Wk16. Ranked secondary endpoints include ≥75% & 90% improvement in PPASI (PPASI75, PPASI90), sPGA 0/1 and 100% improvement in PPASI(PPASI100) at Wk16. Results: Of 174 enrolled, 87(mean age[SD]: 56.9[12.9] years) were randomized to RZB and 87(mean age[SD]: 53.9[14.3] years) were randomized to PBO. Baseline characteristics were similar except for numerical difference in PsA (RZB vs. PBO: 11.5% vs 4.6%, respectively). At Wk16, a significantly higher proportion receiving RZB achieved ppIGA 0/1 than PBO(33.3% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.006). Patients receiving RZB also demonstrated significantly higher responses than patients receiving PBO in all ranked secondary endpoints: PPASI75 (42.5% vs 14.9%, P < 0.001); PPASI90 (27.6% vs 5.7%, p<0.001); sPGA 0/1 (32.2% vs 11.5%, p < 0.001); and PPASI100 (17.2% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001). Four patients (3 RZB: 1 PBO) discontinued drug in period A. At Wk52, ppIGA 0/1 was achieved by 50.6% of RZB patients and 61.7% of PBO/RZB group. Proportion of patients achieving PPASI75 at Wk52 was 57.5%(RZB) vs. 65.4% (PBO/RZB). Achievement of sPGA 0/1 (%RZB vs. %PBO/RZB) was 43.7% vs. 66.7%; PPASI100 was achieved by 26.4% (RZB) and 37.0% (PBO/RZB) patients at Wk52. Proportion of patients with adverse events were 29.1%(RZB) and 23.0%(PBO) in period A, and 49.4%(RZB) and 35.8% (PBO/RZB) in period B. One RZB patient with prior cardiovascular risk factors had an adjudicated myocardial infarction and subsequently died after 140-day follow-up period. The number of patients with COVID-19 were 3 (RZB; 1 serious infection) and 2(PBO) in period A and 11 (RZB) and 7 (PBO/RZB) in period B. Conclusion: This study demonstrates RZB can provide effective improvement compared to PBO by Wk16 with continuous improvement until Wk52 with no new safety signals in patients with moderate-to-severe PPPsO.
一项评估Risankizumab治疗伴有掌跖(非脓疱)累及的中重度斑块型银屑病成人患者安全性和有效性的3b期研究
前言:我们评估了瑞尚单抗(RZB)与安慰剂(PBO)在成人中至重度非脓疱性掌跖牛皮癣(PPPsO)患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:imprint,一项Ph3b研究评估RZB与PBO在中度至重度PPPsO患者中的安全性和有效性,这些患者的静态医师总体评估(sPGA)为中度或重度≥3,掌跖牛皮癣面积和严重程度指数(PPASI)≥8,至少有1个额外的PsO斑块。52周的治疗分为A期,患者随机(1:1)接受150 mg RZB或PBO, B期,患者继续RZB或从PBO切换到RZB (PBO/RZB)。主要终点是达到掌足底研究者的总体评估(ppIGA) 0/1,在Wk16时比基线至少降低2点。排名的次要终点包括≥75% &PPASI(PPASI75, PPASI90), sPGA 0/1改善90%,PPASI(PPASI100)在Wk16时改善100%。结果:174例入组患者中,87例(平均年龄[SD]: 56.9[12.9]岁)随机分为RZB组,87例(平均年龄[SD]: 53.9[14.3]岁)随机分为PBO组。基线特征相似,除了PsA的数值差异(RZB和PBO分别为11.5%和4.6%)。在Wk16时,接受RZB的患者达到ppIGA 0/1的比例明显高于PBO(33.3% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.006)。在所有排名的次要终点,接受RZB的患者也表现出显著高于接受PBO的患者的反应:PPASI75 (42.5% vs 14.9%, P <0.001);PPASI90 (27.6% vs 5.7%, p<0.001);sPGA 0/1 (32.2% vs 11.5%, p <0.001);PPASI100 (17.2% vs. 1.1%, p <0.001)。4例患者(3例RZB: 1例PBO)在a期停药,在Wk52时,50.6%的RZB患者和61.7%的PBO/RZB组达到了ppIGA 0/1。在Wk52时达到PPASI75的患者比例为57.5%(RZB)对65.4% (PBO/RZB)。sPGA 0/1 (%RZB vs %PBO/RZB)的完成率为43.7% vs 66.7%;在Wk52时,26.4% (RZB)和37.0% (PBO/RZB)患者达到了PPASI100。A期不良事件发生率分别为29.1%(RZB)和23.0%(PBO), b期不良事件发生率分别为49.4%(RZB)和35.8% (PBO/RZB)。1例有心血管危险因素的RZB患者经140 d随访后确诊心肌梗死死亡。新冠肺炎患者数为3例(RZB;A期严重感染1例,PBO 2例;B期RZB 11例,PBO/RZB 7例;结论:与Wk16相比,RZB对中重度PPPsO患者可有效改善PBO,且持续改善至Wk52,无新的安全性信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书