Psychometric brahman , psychedelic science: Walter Stace, transnational Vedanta, and the Mystical Experience Questionnaire

IF 1 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jeffrey A. Breau, Paul Gillis-Smith
{"title":"Psychometric <i>brahman</i> , psychedelic science: Walter Stace, transnational Vedanta, and the Mystical Experience Questionnaire","authors":"Jeffrey A. Breau, Paul Gillis-Smith","doi":"10.1080/03080188.2023.2266322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe longstanding juncture between science and religion in psychedelic research is mediated most notably by the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ). The MEQ is a psychometric survey for assessing mystical experiences, and it relies on the work of philosopher Walter Stace for its typology and philosophy of mysticism. Yet there is an under-investigated influence from Vedantic Hinduism that contributed to Stace’s thinking. In an analysis of Stace’s hermeneutics of mysticism, this article demonstrates how Stace’s typology of mystical experience was created in dialogue with major figures in the field of modern, transnational Vedanta. From there, we investigate how these figures’ approaches to religious experience manifest in Stace’s typology of the mystical experience and are preserved in the MEQ. We conclude by discussing how the enduring use of the MEQ, and scientists’ insistence on its theoretical rigour, embeds Stace’s interpretation of modern Vedantic ideas in the contemporary practice of psychedelic science.KEYWORDS: MysticismVedantaMystical Experience Questionnairepsychedelicsreligious studiesconsciousnessHinduismpsychedelic science AcknowledgementsWe thank Dr Nell Hawley for her generous and expert review and Dr J. Christian Greer for his constant support and whose Harvard seminar germinated this research. We also thank our anonymous peer reviewers, the editorial team at Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, and the Special Issue editors, Dr Claudia Gertraud Schwarz and Prof Christine Hauskeller, for their incisive comments and improvements to this article. Finally, we are grateful to the organizers of the Decolonizing the Psychedelic Research Revival panel at the 4S 2022 conference where we first presented this research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 For example, Stace cites James Leuba’s The Psychology of Religious Mysticism, where he expounds on the use of drugs to bring about mystical ecstasy. See Leuba (Citation1925, 8–37).2 The English prose in these translations is assisted by Professor of English Frederick Manchester and the novelist Christopher Isherwood, respectively.3 The term Neo-Hindu or Neo-Vedantic, popularised by Paul Hacker, is a contested moniker, as it suggests a rift from historic Hinduism (Madaio Citation2017). When we use the concept here it is to signal the specific form of Vedanta that Stace was drawing from and its relationship to European influence and epistemologies, but it is important to note the complexity of this history and the internal diversity of this movement.4 Jones, for example, in 2020 considers Stace neither a perennialist nor an essentialist, yet in 2022 (with Gellman) discusses Stace in essentialist terms.5 Peter Sjöstedt-Hughes further develops a Spinozist understanding of psychedelic experience in his “The White Sun of Substance: Spinozism and the Psychedelic Amor dei Intellectualis” chapter in Psychedelics and Philosophy (Sjöstedt-Hughes Citation2022).6 For reference, Stace’s introvertive experience was marked by (1) ‘the Unitary Consciousness’, (2) ‘being nonspatial and nontemporal’, (3) ‘sense of objectivity or reality’, (4) ‘feelings of blessedness, joy, peace, happiness, etc.’, (5) ‘feeling that what is apprehended is holy, sacred, or divine’, (6) ‘paradoxicality, and (7) ‘alleged by mystics to be ineffable’ (Stace Citation1960a, 111).7 For example, see the Roland R. Griffiths, PhD Professorship Fund in Psychedelic Research on Secular Spirituality and Well-Being at Johns Hopkins Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJeffrey A. BreauJeffrey A. Breau is a graduate student at Harvard Divinity School, where his research focuses on emergent psychedelic spiritual communities, psychedelic chaplaincy, and Hinduism. He works as a research assistant with the Center for the Study of World Religions’ Psychedelics and Future of Religion series and is a teaching fellow in the Harvard Sociology department. Jeffrey co-organized, along with Paul Gillis-Smith, the first interdisciplinary conference on psychedelic research at Harvard University, and he is a psychedelic chaplain at Brigham & Women’s Faulkner Hospital.Paul Gillis-SmithPaul Gillis-Smith is a graduate student at Harvard Divinity School and works as a spiritual care provider for ketamine patients at Brigham & Women’s Faulkner Hospital in Boston, MA. He has presented at the annual meetings for the American Academy of Religion (2022) and the Society for the Social Studies of Science (2019, 2022), and co-organized the first interdisciplinary conference on psychedelic research at Harvard University with Jeffrey Breau.","PeriodicalId":50352,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","volume":"63 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2023.2266322","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe longstanding juncture between science and religion in psychedelic research is mediated most notably by the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ). The MEQ is a psychometric survey for assessing mystical experiences, and it relies on the work of philosopher Walter Stace for its typology and philosophy of mysticism. Yet there is an under-investigated influence from Vedantic Hinduism that contributed to Stace’s thinking. In an analysis of Stace’s hermeneutics of mysticism, this article demonstrates how Stace’s typology of mystical experience was created in dialogue with major figures in the field of modern, transnational Vedanta. From there, we investigate how these figures’ approaches to religious experience manifest in Stace’s typology of the mystical experience and are preserved in the MEQ. We conclude by discussing how the enduring use of the MEQ, and scientists’ insistence on its theoretical rigour, embeds Stace’s interpretation of modern Vedantic ideas in the contemporary practice of psychedelic science.KEYWORDS: MysticismVedantaMystical Experience Questionnairepsychedelicsreligious studiesconsciousnessHinduismpsychedelic science AcknowledgementsWe thank Dr Nell Hawley for her generous and expert review and Dr J. Christian Greer for his constant support and whose Harvard seminar germinated this research. We also thank our anonymous peer reviewers, the editorial team at Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, and the Special Issue editors, Dr Claudia Gertraud Schwarz and Prof Christine Hauskeller, for their incisive comments and improvements to this article. Finally, we are grateful to the organizers of the Decolonizing the Psychedelic Research Revival panel at the 4S 2022 conference where we first presented this research.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 For example, Stace cites James Leuba’s The Psychology of Religious Mysticism, where he expounds on the use of drugs to bring about mystical ecstasy. See Leuba (Citation1925, 8–37).2 The English prose in these translations is assisted by Professor of English Frederick Manchester and the novelist Christopher Isherwood, respectively.3 The term Neo-Hindu or Neo-Vedantic, popularised by Paul Hacker, is a contested moniker, as it suggests a rift from historic Hinduism (Madaio Citation2017). When we use the concept here it is to signal the specific form of Vedanta that Stace was drawing from and its relationship to European influence and epistemologies, but it is important to note the complexity of this history and the internal diversity of this movement.4 Jones, for example, in 2020 considers Stace neither a perennialist nor an essentialist, yet in 2022 (with Gellman) discusses Stace in essentialist terms.5 Peter Sjöstedt-Hughes further develops a Spinozist understanding of psychedelic experience in his “The White Sun of Substance: Spinozism and the Psychedelic Amor dei Intellectualis” chapter in Psychedelics and Philosophy (Sjöstedt-Hughes Citation2022).6 For reference, Stace’s introvertive experience was marked by (1) ‘the Unitary Consciousness’, (2) ‘being nonspatial and nontemporal’, (3) ‘sense of objectivity or reality’, (4) ‘feelings of blessedness, joy, peace, happiness, etc.’, (5) ‘feeling that what is apprehended is holy, sacred, or divine’, (6) ‘paradoxicality, and (7) ‘alleged by mystics to be ineffable’ (Stace Citation1960a, 111).7 For example, see the Roland R. Griffiths, PhD Professorship Fund in Psychedelic Research on Secular Spirituality and Well-Being at Johns Hopkins Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJeffrey A. BreauJeffrey A. Breau is a graduate student at Harvard Divinity School, where his research focuses on emergent psychedelic spiritual communities, psychedelic chaplaincy, and Hinduism. He works as a research assistant with the Center for the Study of World Religions’ Psychedelics and Future of Religion series and is a teaching fellow in the Harvard Sociology department. Jeffrey co-organized, along with Paul Gillis-Smith, the first interdisciplinary conference on psychedelic research at Harvard University, and he is a psychedelic chaplain at Brigham & Women’s Faulkner Hospital.Paul Gillis-SmithPaul Gillis-Smith is a graduate student at Harvard Divinity School and works as a spiritual care provider for ketamine patients at Brigham & Women’s Faulkner Hospital in Boston, MA. He has presented at the annual meetings for the American Academy of Religion (2022) and the Society for the Social Studies of Science (2019, 2022), and co-organized the first interdisciplinary conference on psychedelic research at Harvard University with Jeffrey Breau.
心理测量婆罗门,迷幻科学:沃尔特·斯塔斯,跨国吠檀多和神秘体验问卷
【摘要】迷幻药研究中科学与宗教之间的长期联系主要是由神秘体验问卷(MEQ)介导的。MEQ是一项评估神秘体验的心理测量调查,它依赖于哲学家沃尔特·斯泰斯(Walter Stace)的类型学和神秘主义哲学。然而,吠陀印度教对斯塔斯思想的影响尚未得到充分研究。在对斯泰斯神秘主义解释学的分析中,本文展示了斯泰斯神秘经验的类型学是如何在与现代跨国吠檀多领域主要人物的对话中创造出来的。在此基础上,我们研究了这些人物对宗教体验的态度是如何在Stace的神秘体验类型学中表现出来的,并被保存在MEQ中。最后,我们讨论了MEQ的长期使用,以及科学家对其理论严谨性的坚持,是如何将Stace对现代吠檀多思想的解释嵌入到当代迷幻科学实践中的。关键词:神秘主义吠檀多神秘体验问卷宗教研究意识工业迷幻科学感谢我们感谢Nell Hawley博士的慷慨和专业的评论,感谢J. Christian Greer博士的持续支持,以及他在哈佛大学的研讨会孕育了这项研究。我们还要感谢我们的匿名同行评议人、《跨学科科学评论》的编辑团队以及特刊编辑Claudia Gertraud Schwarz博士和Christine Hauskeller教授,感谢他们对本文的深刻评论和改进。最后,我们感谢在4S 2022会议上非殖民化迷幻研究复兴小组的组织者,在那里我们首次展示了这项研究。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1例如,斯泰斯引用了詹姆斯·路巴(James Leuba)的《宗教神秘主义心理学》(The Psychology of Religious Mysticism),他在书中阐述了使用药物带来神秘的狂喜。参见Leuba (Citation1925, 8-37)这些译本中的英文散文分别由英语教授弗雷德里克·曼彻斯特和小说家克里斯托弗·伊舍伍德协助保罗·哈克(Paul Hacker)推广的“新印度教”或“新吠檀多”一词是一个有争议的绰号,因为它暗示了与历史印度教的分歧(Madaio Citation2017)。当我们在这里使用这个概念时,它是为了表明斯塔斯所借鉴的吠檀多的具体形式,以及它与欧洲影响和认识论的关系,但重要的是要注意这段历史的复杂性和这一运动的内部多样性例如,琼斯在2020年认为斯塔斯既不是一个永恒主义者,也不是一个本质主义者,但在2022年(与格尔曼)从本质主义者的角度讨论了斯塔斯彼得Sjöstedt-Hughes在他的“物质的白色太阳:斯宾诺莎主义和迷幻的理智之爱”一章中进一步发展了斯宾诺莎对迷幻体验的理解(Sjöstedt-Hughes Citation2022)作为参考,斯泰斯的内省经验的特点是:(1)“统一意识”,(2)“非空间和非时间”,(3)“客观性或现实感”,(4)“幸福、快乐、和平、幸福等的感觉”,(5)“感觉所理解的是神圣的、神圣的或神圣的”,(6)“悖论性”,以及(7)“被神秘主义者声称是不可言说的”(斯泰斯引文1960a, 111)例如,参见Roland R. Griffiths博士教授基金,在约翰霍普金斯大学迷幻药和意识研究中心进行迷幻药研究,研究世俗灵性和幸福感。作者简介:jeffrey a . Breau jeffrey a . Breau是哈佛神学院的一名研究生,他的研究重点是新兴迷幻精神社区、迷幻牧师和印度教。他是世界宗教研究中心“迷幻剂和宗教未来”系列的研究助理,也是哈佛大学社会学系的助教。杰弗里和保罗·吉利斯-史密斯共同组织了哈佛大学第一次迷幻药研究跨学科会议,他是布莱根妇女福克纳医院的一名迷幻药牧师。Paul Gillis-Smith是哈佛神学院的研究生,在马萨诸塞州波士顿的布里格姆妇女福克纳医院为氯胺酮患者提供精神护理。他曾在美国宗教学会(2022年)和科学社会研究学会(2019年、2022年)的年会上发表演讲,并与杰弗里·布劳(Jeffrey Breau)在哈佛大学共同组织了第一届迷幻药研究跨学科会议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews is a quarterly journal that aims to explore the social, philosophical and historical interrelations of the natural sciences, engineering, mathematics, medicine and technology with the social sciences, humanities and arts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信