Non-Western Peacekeeping as a Factor of a Multipolar World: Outlines of Research Program

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Yao N. Adu, Svetlana A. Bokeriya, Denis A. Degterev, Alexander B. Mezyaev, Pavel V. Shamarov
{"title":"Non-Western Peacekeeping as a Factor of a Multipolar World: Outlines of Research Program","authors":"Yao N. Adu, Svetlana A. Bokeriya, Denis A. Degterev, Alexander B. Mezyaev, Pavel V. Shamarov","doi":"10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-3-415-434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the contours of a research program on peacekeeping and peacebuilding, representing the interests of Non-Western countries (the world’s majority). The article is based on both individual developments of its expert authors in the theory and practice of peacekeeping, international law and development cooperation, as well as on generalized conclusions of eight international workshops on Non-Western peacekeeping, held by the Department of Theory and History of International Relations of the RUDN University in 2020-2021 with the participation of leading Russian and international experts. Particular attention is paid to the current moment in international peacekeeping associated with the “power transit” (from the United States to China, and more broadly, from the West to the Non-West) and the power vacuum observed in a number of regions. Conclusions are drawn about the crisis of humanitarian intervention and the system of liberal peacekeeping in general. At the same time, the remaining instruments of Western structural power in the field of peacekeeping are examined in detail, covering both personnel representation in the UN and the practice of ‘penholding,’ as well as the discursive hegemony of the “Collective West.” The main directions in the development of Non-Western academic discourse in the field of peacemaking and peacebuilding are explored in the context of building a multipolar world. Special attention is paid to the problems of regional human rights systems in the context of the protection of civilians and post-conflict peacebuilding. The study concludes that Non-Western countries have a significant influence on the formation of international norms in the field of peacekeeping (rule-changers), but so far do not act as norm-setting actors in world politics (rule-makers).","PeriodicalId":55752,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik RUDN International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2023-23-3-415-434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the contours of a research program on peacekeeping and peacebuilding, representing the interests of Non-Western countries (the world’s majority). The article is based on both individual developments of its expert authors in the theory and practice of peacekeeping, international law and development cooperation, as well as on generalized conclusions of eight international workshops on Non-Western peacekeeping, held by the Department of Theory and History of International Relations of the RUDN University in 2020-2021 with the participation of leading Russian and international experts. Particular attention is paid to the current moment in international peacekeeping associated with the “power transit” (from the United States to China, and more broadly, from the West to the Non-West) and the power vacuum observed in a number of regions. Conclusions are drawn about the crisis of humanitarian intervention and the system of liberal peacekeeping in general. At the same time, the remaining instruments of Western structural power in the field of peacekeeping are examined in detail, covering both personnel representation in the UN and the practice of ‘penholding,’ as well as the discursive hegemony of the “Collective West.” The main directions in the development of Non-Western academic discourse in the field of peacemaking and peacebuilding are explored in the context of building a multipolar world. Special attention is paid to the problems of regional human rights systems in the context of the protection of civilians and post-conflict peacebuilding. The study concludes that Non-Western countries have a significant influence on the formation of international norms in the field of peacekeeping (rule-changers), but so far do not act as norm-setting actors in world politics (rule-makers).
非西方维持和平作为多极世界的一个因素:研究计划大纲
本文描述了代表非西方国家(世界上大多数国家)利益的维持和平与建设和平研究项目的轮廓。这篇文章基于专家作者在维和、国际法和发展合作的理论和实践方面的个人发展,以及俄罗斯人民解放军大学国际关系理论与历史系于2020-2021年举办的八次非西方维和国际研讨会的总体结论,与会的有俄罗斯和国际知名专家。特别关注与“权力转移”(从美国到中国,更广泛地说,从西方到非西方)和在一些地区观察到的权力真空有关的当前国际维和时刻。总结了人道主义干预的危机和一般的自由维和制度。与此同时,对西方在维和领域的结构性权力的剩余工具进行了详细的研究,包括在联合国的人员代表和“拖延”的实践,以及“集体西方”的话语霸权。在构建多极世界的背景下,探讨了非西方建立和平与建设和平领域学术话语发展的主要方向。特别注意在保护平民和冲突后建设和平方面的区域人权制度问题。该研究的结论是,非西方国家对维持和平领域国际规范的形成具有重大影响(规则改变者),但迄今为止还没有在世界政治中充当规范制定者(规则制定者)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vestnik RUDN International Relations
Vestnik RUDN International Relations Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信