Soil moisture content and maize grain yield under conventional and conservation agriculture practices - results of short term field tests in liselo, Namibia

P. Kudumo L., Itanna F., Thierfelder C., Kambatuku J.
{"title":"Soil moisture content and maize grain yield under conventional and conservation agriculture practices - results of short term field tests in liselo, Namibia","authors":"P. Kudumo L., Itanna F., Thierfelder C., Kambatuku J.","doi":"10.5897/ajar2023.16327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the results from trials developed to monitor the short-term effects of conventionally tilled systems versus CA on soil quality and crop productivity under conditions of the major cropping systems in central, north-central and north-eastern regions of Namibia. Conventional tillage (CT), Minimum tillage (MT), Minimum tillage, mulch (MT-M), Minimum tillage, rotation (MT-R) and Minimum tillage, mulch and rotation (MT-MR) were the primary treatments tested. Significant differences (p≤0.000) among the treatments were observed in the 0-60 cm soil profiles where MT-M plots had the highest soil moisture content (39.8 mm, Standard Error of Mean 0.2815) over the study period. A significant difference (p=0.0206) in grain yield was observed in the second season with CT plots yielding the highest grain yield (3852.3 kg ha-1, standard error of mean 240.35). Results suggest that CA has the potential to increase water conservation and contribute to reduction of the risk of crop failure. Climate change driven degradation under conventional tillage necessitate alternative sustainable tillage methods. Conservation tillage methods and conservation agricultural practices that minimize soil disturbance while maintaining soil cover need to be adopted more locally as viable alternatives to conventional tillage. Key words: Conservation agriculture, conventional tillage, grain yield, soil moisture content.","PeriodicalId":7540,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar2023.16327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the results from trials developed to monitor the short-term effects of conventionally tilled systems versus CA on soil quality and crop productivity under conditions of the major cropping systems in central, north-central and north-eastern regions of Namibia. Conventional tillage (CT), Minimum tillage (MT), Minimum tillage, mulch (MT-M), Minimum tillage, rotation (MT-R) and Minimum tillage, mulch and rotation (MT-MR) were the primary treatments tested. Significant differences (p≤0.000) among the treatments were observed in the 0-60 cm soil profiles where MT-M plots had the highest soil moisture content (39.8 mm, Standard Error of Mean 0.2815) over the study period. A significant difference (p=0.0206) in grain yield was observed in the second season with CT plots yielding the highest grain yield (3852.3 kg ha-1, standard error of mean 240.35). Results suggest that CA has the potential to increase water conservation and contribute to reduction of the risk of crop failure. Climate change driven degradation under conventional tillage necessitate alternative sustainable tillage methods. Conservation tillage methods and conservation agricultural practices that minimize soil disturbance while maintaining soil cover need to be adopted more locally as viable alternatives to conventional tillage. Key words: Conservation agriculture, conventional tillage, grain yield, soil moisture content.
传统和保护性农业做法下的土壤水分含量和玉米谷物产量——纳米比亚liselo短期田间试验的结果
本文重点介绍了在纳米比亚中部、中北部和东北部地区的主要耕作制度条件下,为监测传统耕作制度与CA对土壤质量和作物生产力的短期影响而开展的试验结果。试验的主要处理为常规耕作(CT)、最少耕作(MT)、最少耕作+覆盖(MT- m)、最少耕作+轮作(MT- r)和最少耕作+覆盖+轮作(MT- mr)。在0 ~ 60 cm土壤剖面上,MT-M地块土壤含水量最高(39.8 mm,平均标准误差0.2815),各处理间差异显著(p≤0.000)。第二季籽粒产量差异显著(p=0.0206), CT小区籽粒产量最高(3852.3 kg hm -1,平均标准误差为240.35)。结果表明,CA具有提高节水和降低作物歉收风险的潜力。气候变化导致的传统耕作方式的退化需要替代的可持续耕作方法。在保持土壤覆盖的同时尽量减少土壤干扰的保护性耕作方法和保护性农业做法需要更多地在当地采用,作为传统耕作的可行替代方案。关键词:保护性农业,常规耕作,粮食产量,土壤含水量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Agricultural Research
African Journal of Agricultural Research 农林科学-农业综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
2.6 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信