Catheter-based serratus anterior plane block vs. continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain control following minimally invasive atrioventricular valve surgery : a randomized, prospective trial

IF 0.1 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
B Vanden Bussche, M Vandenheuvel, A Moerman
{"title":"Catheter-based serratus anterior plane block vs. continuous wound infiltration for postoperative pain control following minimally invasive atrioventricular valve surgery : a randomized, prospective trial","authors":"B Vanden Bussche, M Vandenheuvel, A Moerman","doi":"10.56126/74.3.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery via mini-thoracotomy reduces surgical trauma compared to full sternotomy. However, thoracotomy can cause severe postoperative pain. Managing postoperative pain is challenging but critical for fast rehabilitation and avoidance of chronic pain. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of analgesia of a bolus in combination with continuous local anaesthetics using a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) catheter versus a wound infiltration catheter (CWI) in patients after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Design and setting: We conducted a monocentric, prospective, randomized controlled trial between January 2021 and August 2022. The study was performed at Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. Methods: Patients scheduled for minimally invasive cardiac surgery via thoracoscopy and mini-thoracotomy were randomized to receive either a SABP or a CWI catheter. Postoperatively, continuous ropivacaine 0.2% was started at 10ml/h, and a supplementary bolus of 30ml ropivacaine 0.5% was administered one hour before detubation. The catheter remained in place for at least 24 hours. The primary endpoint was opioid consumption during the first 48 hours postdetubation. Secondary endpoints were anti-emetic consumption, Numerical Analogue Score for 48 hours, length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit and hospital, and incidence of chronic pain. Qualitative data were compared using the Chi – Square test, quantitative data were analyzed with the Student’s t-test. Results: During the study period, a total of 21 patients received a SAPB catheter and 26 patients received a CWI catheter. No statistical significant differences were seen in baseline characteristics. In the first 48 hours postdetubation, morphine equivalent consumption was similar in both groups (p= 0.52), with no differences observed in the early, mid- or late postoperative phases. The total morphine equivalent dose was 21.8 mg in the SAPB and 18.6 mg in the CWI group. There were no significant differences in postoperative vomiting and nausea, length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit and in the hospital and chronic thoracic pain (23% and 33% for the SAPB and CWI group, respectively, p=0.54). Conclusion: This prospective study found no significant difference in postoperative opioid consumption between patients who received a serratus anterior plane block catheter and those who received a wound catheter with bolus and continuous ropivacaine, following minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right thoracoscopy and mini-thoracotomy.","PeriodicalId":7024,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56126/74.3.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery via mini-thoracotomy reduces surgical trauma compared to full sternotomy. However, thoracotomy can cause severe postoperative pain. Managing postoperative pain is challenging but critical for fast rehabilitation and avoidance of chronic pain. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of analgesia of a bolus in combination with continuous local anaesthetics using a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) catheter versus a wound infiltration catheter (CWI) in patients after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Design and setting: We conducted a monocentric, prospective, randomized controlled trial between January 2021 and August 2022. The study was performed at Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. Methods: Patients scheduled for minimally invasive cardiac surgery via thoracoscopy and mini-thoracotomy were randomized to receive either a SABP or a CWI catheter. Postoperatively, continuous ropivacaine 0.2% was started at 10ml/h, and a supplementary bolus of 30ml ropivacaine 0.5% was administered one hour before detubation. The catheter remained in place for at least 24 hours. The primary endpoint was opioid consumption during the first 48 hours postdetubation. Secondary endpoints were anti-emetic consumption, Numerical Analogue Score for 48 hours, length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit and hospital, and incidence of chronic pain. Qualitative data were compared using the Chi – Square test, quantitative data were analyzed with the Student’s t-test. Results: During the study period, a total of 21 patients received a SAPB catheter and 26 patients received a CWI catheter. No statistical significant differences were seen in baseline characteristics. In the first 48 hours postdetubation, morphine equivalent consumption was similar in both groups (p= 0.52), with no differences observed in the early, mid- or late postoperative phases. The total morphine equivalent dose was 21.8 mg in the SAPB and 18.6 mg in the CWI group. There were no significant differences in postoperative vomiting and nausea, length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit and in the hospital and chronic thoracic pain (23% and 33% for the SAPB and CWI group, respectively, p=0.54). Conclusion: This prospective study found no significant difference in postoperative opioid consumption between patients who received a serratus anterior plane block catheter and those who received a wound catheter with bolus and continuous ropivacaine, following minimally invasive cardiac surgery via right thoracoscopy and mini-thoracotomy.
基于导管的锯肌前平面阻滞与微创房室瓣膜手术后持续伤口浸润的疼痛控制:一项随机、前瞻性试验
背景:微创心脏手术与全胸骨切开术相比可减少手术创伤。然而,开胸手术会引起严重的术后疼痛。术后疼痛管理具有挑战性,但对于快速康复和避免慢性疼痛至关重要。我们的目的是比较微创心脏手术后使用serratus anterior plane block (SAPB)导管与伤口浸润导管(CWI)联合使用大丸镇痛和持续局部麻醉的疗效。设计和环境:我们在2021年1月至2022年8月期间进行了一项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。该研究在比利时根特大学医院进行。方法:计划通过胸腔镜和小开胸微创心脏手术的患者随机接受SABP或CWI导管。术后以10ml/h持续给予0.2%罗哌卡因,拔管前1小时补充30ml 0.5%罗哌卡因。导尿管放置了至少24小时。主要终点是拔管后48小时内阿片类药物的消耗。次要终点是止吐药消耗、48小时数值模拟评分、在重症监护病房和医院的住院时间以及慢性疼痛的发生率。定性资料比较采用卡方检验,定量资料分析采用学生t检验。结果:研究期间,共有21例患者接受了SAPB导管,26例患者接受了CWI导管。基线特征无统计学显著差异。拔管后48小时内,两组吗啡当量用量相似(p= 0.52),术后早期、中期和晚期无差异。吗啡总当量剂量SAPB组为21.8 mg, CWI组为18.6 mg。术后呕吐和恶心、重症监护病房和住院时间以及慢性胸痛方面无显著差异(SAPB组和CWI组分别为23%和33%,p=0.54)。结论:本前瞻性研究发现,经右胸腔镜和小开胸微创心脏手术后,采用前锯肌平面阻滞导管与创面置管加罗哌卡因连续输注的患者术后阿片类药物消耗无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: L’Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica est le journal de la SBAR, publié 4 fois par an. L’Acta a été publié pour la première fois en 1950. Depuis 1973 l’Acta est publié dans la langue Anglaise, ce qui a été résulté à un rayonnement plus internationaux. Depuis lors l’Acta est devenu un journal à ne pas manquer dans le domaine d’Anesthésie Belge, offrant e.a. les textes du congrès annuel, les Research Meetings, … Vous en trouvez aussi les dates des Research Meetings, du congrès annuel et des autres réunions.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信